Skip to main content
Skip main navigation
Research Article
10 January 2017

Who killed the world?’ Religious paradox in Mad Max: Fury Road

Publication: Science Fiction Film & Television
Volume 10, Number 3

Abstract

George Miller’s Mad Max film series examines dystopian concerns vis-à-vis geographic instability and the fragility of human societal relationships, ultimately connecting human population crisis with the scarcity of natural resources and overall destruction of the planet. In his latest film, Fury Road, Miller makes use of religious ideology and practice to highlight ecological concerns and abuse of women. He contrasts patriarchal and matriarchal religious power structures in order to interrogate the causes of the Earth’s destruction. From these ideological contrasts, Miller introduces an ecological paradox that forms the film’s conflict. Oppressive patriarchal practices enslave people through false promises of eternity, but can offer no means to avoid a death brought about by earthly suffering. Conversely, matriarchal religious practices ensure equality but offer no sustainable model of maintaining the Earth’s resources. Ultimately, I argue that Miller employs this religious paradox to illustrate the problems of earthly salvation in relation to religious ideology. Miller suggests that devout worship, no matter how mindful or restorative, cannot rescue us from the ravaged Earth, nor can it absolve us from the guilt of ruining the environment.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Booker, M. Keith. Dystopian Literature: A Theory and Research Guide. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1994.Dystopian Literature: A Theory and Research Guide
Booker, M. Keith. ‘On Dystopia’. Critical Insights: Dystopia. Ed. M. Keith Booker. Ipswich: Salem Press, 2013. 1–15.‘On Dystopia’ Dystopian Literature: A Theory and Research Guide 1 -15
Dockterman, Eliana. ‘Vagina Monologues Writer Eve Ensler: How Mad Max: Fury Road Became a “Feminist Action Film”’. Time (7 May 2015). http://time.com/3850323/mad-max-fury-road-eve-ensler-feminist/. Accessed 21 Sep 2017.
Eaton, Heather and Lois Ann Lorentzen. ‘Introduction’. Ecofeminism and Globalization: Exploring Culture, Context, and Religion, eds Heather Eaton and Lois Ann Lorentzon. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003. 1–8.‘Introduction’ Ecofeminism and Globalization: Exploring Culture, Context, and Religion 1 -8
Gaard, Greta. ‘Living Interconnections with Animals and Nature.’ Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature. Ed. Greta Gaard. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 1993. 1–12.‘Living Interconnections with Animals and Nature.’ Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature 1 -12
Garrard, Greg. Ecocriticism. London: Routledge, 2004.Ecocriticism
Gebara, Ivone. Longing for Running Water: Ecofeminism and Liberation. Trans. David Molineaux. Minnesota: Fortress Press, 1999.Longing for Running Water: Ecofeminism and Liberation
Han, Angie. ‘The Heroic Masculinity of “Mad Max: Fury Road”’. Slashfilm.com. http://www.slashfilm.com/mad-max-masculinity. Accessed 1 Feb 2016.
Haig, Francesca. ‘“Billows of Ash”: Cormac McCarthy’s Road Back to Auschwitz’. Apocalyptic Discourse in Contemporary Culture. Ed. Monica Germanà and Aris Mousoutzanis. London: Routledge, 2014. 162–74.‘“Billows of Ash”: Cormac McCarthy’s Road Back to Auschwitz’ Apocalyptic Discourse in Contemporary Culture 162 -74
Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2005.A Brief History of Neoliberalism
James, P.D. The Children of Men. New York: Vintage Books, 1992.The Children of Men
Mellor, Mary. Feminism & Ecology. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997. Nall, Jeffrey Allen. Feminism and the Mastery of Women and Childbirth: An Ecofeminist Examination of the Cultural Maiming and Reclaiming of Maternal Agency during Childbirth. London: Academica Press, 2014.Feminism & Ecology
The Nelson Study Bible (New King James Version), ed. Earl D. Radmacher. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1997.The Nelson Study Bible (New King James Version)
Redmond, Sean. ‘Future Almost Lost: Dystopian Science-Fiction Film’. Critical Insights: Dystopia. Ed. M. Keith Booker, Ipswich: Salem Press, 2013. 257–74.‘Future Almost Lost: Dystopian Science-Fiction Film’ Critical Insights: Dystopia 257 -74
Roberts, Adam C. ‘Zpocalypse’. Apocalyptic Discourse in Contemporary Culture. Eds Monica Germanà and Aris Mousoutzanis. London: Routledge, 2014. 220–33.‘Zpocalypse’ Apocalyptic Discourse in Contemporary Culture 220 -33
Ross, Julianne. ‘Beyond Furiosa: The Unsung Heroines of “Mad Max: Fury Road”’. https://medium.com/@julianneross/beyond-furiosa-the-unsung-heroines-of-mad-max-fury-road-396d5e1171f9#.lxnjpnd3a. Accessed 15 May 2017.
Ruether, Rosemary Radford. Gaia & God: An Ecofeminist Theology of Earth Healing. California: Harper San Francisco, 1992.Gaia & God: An Ecofeminist Theology of Earth Healing
Savas, E.S. Privatization and Public-Private Partnerships. New York: Seven Bridges Press, 2000.Privatization and Public-Private Partnerships
Shiva, Vandana. ‘The Impoverishment of the Environment: Women and Children Last’. Ecofeminism, Eds. Maria Mies and Vandana Shiva. London: Zed Books, 1993. 70–90.‘The Impoverishment of the Environment: Women and Children Last’ Ecofeminism 70 -90

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science Fiction Film & Television
Volume 10Number 3October 2017
Pages: 371 - 390

History

Published online: 10 January 2017
Published in print: October 2017

Keywords

  1. Keywords:
  2. Mad Max films
  3. ecofeminism
  4. Mad Max
  5. privatisation

Authors

Affiliations

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

/graphql/ContentItem/ContentItemCitedBy.xsl needs to be defined for the product

Cited by

  • “What If We Were Savage?” Mad Max Transmedia as Speculative Anthropology , The Journal of Religion and Popular Culture, 10.3138/jrpc.2020-0063, 35, 1, (21-35), (2023).
  • Is the Future Feminist? A Reading of Mad Max: Fury Road (2015) and Logan (2017) , Gender and Action Films 2000 and Beyond, 10.1108/978-1-80117-518-020221013, (103-117), (2022).

View Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF

View PDF

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media