Skip to main content
Skip main navigation

Abstract

The term ‘territory’ is today widely used. The academic literature on spatial planning often presents the notion of territory via definitions that restrict it to legal spaces unsuited to the need to adjust spatial planning and development action to the real modes of functioning of spaces in the context of globalisation. As a result, certain authors chose a different approach to space, by way of the notion of soft/hard spaces. This paper sets out to propose an alternative viewpoint to this dichotomy by returning to an academic issue, which aimed to define the notion of territory in geography.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

ALLMENDINGER, P., CHILLA, T. and SIELKER, F. (2014), ‘Europeanizing territoriality: towards soft spaces?’, Environment and Planning A, 46, 2703–17.Europeanizing territoriality: towards soft spaces? Environment and Planning A 46 2703 -17
ALLMENDINGER, P. and HAUGHTON, G. (2009), ‘Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: the new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway’, Environment and Planning A, 41, 617–33.Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: the new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway Environment and Planning A 41 617 -33
ALLMENDINGER, P., HAUGHTON, G., KNIELING, J. and OTHENGRAFEN, F. (2015), ‘Soft spaces: planning practices of territorial governance’, in P. Allmendinger, G. Haughton, J. Knieling and F. Othengrafen (eds), Soft Spaces in Europe: Re-negotiating Governance, Boundaries and Borders, Oxon and New York, Routledge, 3–22.Soft spaces: planning practices of territorial governance Soft Spaces in Europe: Re-negotiating Governance, Boundaries and Borders 3 -22
BADIE, B. (1995), La fin des territoires, Paris, Fayard.La fin des territoires
BOUDON, R. (1973), L’inégalité des chances: La mobilité sociale dans les sociétés industrielles, Paris, Armand Colin.L’inégalité des chances: La mobilité sociale dans les sociétés industrielles
COUDROY DE LILLE, L. (2010), ‘L’aménagement du territoire européen au défi de l’élargissement vers l’Est’, in Y. Jean and G. Baudelle (eds), L’Europe: Aménager les territoires, Paris, Armand Colin, 162–79.L’aménagement du territoire européen au défi de l’élargissement vers l’Est L’Europe: Aménager les territoires 162 -79
DEJEAN, F. (2010), ‘Les enseignements de l’urbanisme multiculturel’, Géographie et cultures, 74, 79–95.Les enseignements de l’urbanisme multiculturel Géographie et cultures 74 79 -95
DI MÉO, G. (1998), Géographie sociale et territoire, Paris, Editions Nathan.Géographie sociale et territoire
DURAND-DASTES, F. and SANDERS, L. (2005), ‘Spatial system’, Hypergéo (online), http://www.hypergeo.eu/spip.php?article85.
ELISSALDE, B. (2002), ‘Une géographie des territoires’, L’information géographique, 66, 3, 193–205.Une géographie des territoires L’information géographique 66 193 -205
ESPON (2013), ESPON ET 2050: Territorial Scenarios and Visions for Europe (draft final report).
FALUDI, A. (2013), ‘Terriorial cohesion and subsidiarity under the European Union treaties: a critique of the “territorialism” underlying’, Regional Studies, 47, 1594–1606.Terriorial cohesion and subsidiarity under the European Union treaties: a critique of the “territorialism” underlying Regional Studies 47 1594 -1606
FALUDI, A. (2016), ‘The poverty of territorialism: revisiting European spatial planning’, Disp, The Planning Review, 52, 73–81.The poverty of territorialism: revisiting European spatial planning Disp, The Planning Review 52 73 -81
FERRIER, J.-P. (1984), Antée I: La géographie ça sert d’abord à parler du territoire, ou le métier du géographe, Aix-en-Provence, Édisud.Antée I: La géographie ça sert d’abord à parler du territoire, ou le métier du géographe
FOUCHER, M. (1991), Fronts et frontières: Un tour du monde géopolitique, Paris, Fayard.Fronts et frontières: Un tour du monde géopolitique
FRÉMONT, A., CHEVALIER, J., HÉRIN, R. and RENARD, J. (1984), Géographie sociale, Paris, Masson.Géographie sociale
KYMLICKA, W. (2001), Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction (2nd edn), Oxford, Oxford University Press.Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction
KYMLICKA, W. (2003), Les théories de la justice, Paris, La Découverte.Les théories de la justice
LASCOUMES, P. and LE GALÈS, P. (2012), Sociologie de l’action publique, Paris, Armand Colin.
LE BERRE, M. (1992), ‘Territoire’, in A. Bailly, R. Ferras and D. Pumain, Encyclopédie de la géographie, Paris, Economica, 601–22.Territoire Encyclopédie de la géographie 601 -22
LEFEBVRE, H. (1974), La production de l’espace, Paris, Editions Anthropos.La production de l’espace
RAFFESTIN, C. (1980), Pour une géographie du pouvoir, Paris, LITEC.Pour une géographie du pouvoir
RAFFESTIN, C. (1986), ‘Ecogénèse territoriale et territorialité’, in F. Auriac and R. Brunet (eds), Espaces, jeux et enjeux, Paris, Fayard.Ecogénèse territoriale et territorialité Espaces, jeux et enjeux
STEAD, D. (2014), ‘European integration and spatial rescaling in the Baltic region: soft spaces, soft planning and soft security’, European Planning Studies, 22, 680–93.European integration and spatial rescaling in the Baltic region: soft spaces, soft planning and soft security European Planning Studies 22 680 -93
STEAD, D. and PÁLNÉ KOVÁCS, I. (2015), ‘Shifts in governance and government across Europe’, in P. Schmitt and L. van Well (eds), Territorial Governance across Europe: Pathways, Practices and Prospects, Oxon and New York, Routledge, 21–35.Shifts in governance and government across Europe Territorial Governance across Europe: Pathways, Practices and Prospects 21 -35
STEIN, S. M. and HARPER, T. L. (2012), ‘Creativity and innovation: divergence and convergence in pragmatic dialogical planning’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32, 5–17.Creativity and innovation: divergence and convergence in pragmatic dialogical planning Journal of Planning Education and Research 32 5 -17
TAYLOR, N. (1998), Urban Planning Theory since 1945, London, Thousands Oaks and New Delhi, SAGE Publications.Urban Planning Theory since 1945
WALSH, C., JANUCIAK-SUDA, M., KNIELING, J. and OTHENGRAFEN, F. (2012), ‘Soft spaces in spatial planning and governance: theoretical reflections and definitional issues’ (paper for Regional Studies Association European Conference, Delft, 13–16 May).Soft spaces in spatial planning and governance: theoretical reflections and definitional issues 13 -16

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Town Planning Review
Volume 89Number 1January 2018
Pages: 43 - 60

History

Published online: 1 January 2018
Published in print: January 2018

Keywords

  1. territory
  2. soft space
  3. spatial planning
  4. constructivism
  5. systemic approach

Authors

Affiliations

Frédéric Santamaria [email protected]
Frédéric Santamaria is Assistant Director of UMS-RIATE and Senior Lecturer at the Université Paris Diderot, UFR géographie, Histoire sciences de la société, Case 7001, Bâtiment Olympe de Gouges, 5 rue Thomas Mann, Paris 75205, France; Bernard Elissalde is Full Professor at the University of Rouen, 7 rue Thomas Becket, Mont-Saint-Aignan cedex 76820, France; e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Bernard Elissalde [email protected]
Frédéric Santamaria is Assistant Director of UMS-RIATE and Senior Lecturer at the Université Paris Diderot, UFR géographie, Histoire sciences de la société, Case 7001, Bâtiment Olympe de Gouges, 5 rue Thomas Mann, Paris 75205, France; Bernard Elissalde is Full Professor at the University of Rouen, 7 rue Thomas Becket, Mont-Saint-Aignan cedex 76820, France; e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

/graphql/ContentItem/ContentItemCitedBy.xsl needs to be defined for the product

Cited by

  • The European Union, Territorial Inequalities, 10.1002/9781394257409.ch5, (143-192), (2023).
  • Soft Spaces as a Traveling Planning Idea: Uncovering the Origin and Development of an Academic Concept on the Rise, Journal of Planning Literature, 10.1177/0885412221992287, 36, 3, (312-327), (2021).
  • Does territory really matters and, if so, how?, Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning, 10.24306/TrAESOP.2020.02.003, 4, 2, (111-121), (2020).
  • A many and invisible kingdom? – the lost and found territories of ‘Brexit Britain’Un royaume multiple et invisible ? - les territoires perdus et retrouvés de la Grande Bretagne du « Brexit », Géocarrefour, 10.4000/geocarrefour.16013, 94, 3, (2020).
  • Post-geography worlds, new dominions, left behind regions, and ‘other’ places: unpacking some spatial imaginaries of the UK’s ‘Brexit’ debate, Space and Polity, 10.1080/13562576.2018.1531699, 22, 2, (137-161), (2018).
  • Investigating the partnership approach in the EU Urban Agenda from the perspective of soft planning, European Planning Studies, 10.1080/09654313.2018.1527294, 27, 1, (86-105), (2018).

View Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF

View PDF

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media