Re-imagining neighbourhood governance: the future of neighbourhood planning in England

Wargent, Matthew; Parker, Gavin; Wargent, Matthew; Parker, Gavin

doi:https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2018.23

Town Planning Review (2018), 89, (4), 379–402.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2018.23
Language: English
Pages: 24

Abstract

Neighbourhood planning is arguably the most radical innovation in UK neighbourhood governance in a generation, with over 2,200 communities in England now involved in statutory development planning at the neighbourhood level. Following incremental policy reforms, we argue that neighbourhood planning has reached a critical juncture where the future of the initiative is at stake. In this article we reflect on existing research to assess the policy to date before imagining what an optimised version of the policy might look like. Despite being a state-led initiative, central government has failed to provide an image of success for neighbourhood planning which we argue has held back widespread innovation and progressive participation. We therefore outline a normative guide against which future iterations of neighbourhood planning might be assessed, and employ this in order to imagine a more comprehensive form of neighbourhood governance.

FormatArticle

£25.00

READ THIS ARTICLE

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

ALBRECHTS, L. (2012), ‘Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective’, Planning Theory, 12, 46–63. Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective Planning Theory 12 46 63 Google Scholar

ALLMENDINGER, P. and HAUGHTON, G. (2015), ‘Post-political regimes in English planning: from third way to Big Society’, in J. Metzger, P. Allmendinger and S. Oosterlynck (eds), Planning Against the Political, London, Routledge, 29–54. Post-political regimes in English planning: from third way to Big Society Planning Against the Political 29 54 Google Scholar

BAILEY, N. (2017), ‘Housing at the neighbourhood level: a review of the initial approaches to neighbourhood development plans under the Localism Act 2011 in England’, Journal of Urbanism, 10, 1–14. Housing at the neighbourhood level: a review of the initial approaches to neighbourhood development plans under the Localism Act 2011 in England Journal of Urbanism 10 1 14 Google Scholar

BAILEY, N. and PILL, M. (2014), ‘The potential for neighbourhood regeneration in a period of austerity: changing forms of neighbourhood governance in two cities’, Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 7, 150–63. The potential for neighbourhood regeneration in a period of austerity: changing forms of neighbourhood governance in two cities Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal 7 150 63 Google Scholar

BAILEY, N. and PILL, M. (2015), ‘Can the state empower communities through localism?’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33, 289–304. Can the state empower communities through localism? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33 289 304 Google Scholar

BOVAIRD, T. (2007), ‘Beyond engagement and participation: user and community coproduction of public services’, Public Administration Review, 67, 846–60. Beyond engagement and participation: user and community coproduction of public services Public Administration Review 67 846 60 Google Scholar

BRADLEY, Q. (2015), ‘The political identities of neighbourhood planning in England’, Space and Polity, 19, 97–109. The political identities of neighbourhood planning in England Space and Polity 19 97 109 Google Scholar

BRADLEY, Q. (2017), ‘Neighbourhood planning and the impact of place identity on housing development in England’, Planning Theory and Practice, 18, 233–48. Neighbourhood planning and the impact of place identity on housing development in England Planning Theory and Practice 18 233 48 Google Scholar

BRADLEY, Q. (2018), ‘Neighbourhood planning and the production of spatial knowledge’, Town Planning Review, 89, 23–42. Neighbourhood planning and the production of spatial knowledge Town Planning Review 89 23 42 Google Scholar

BRADLEY, Q. and BROWNILL, S. (2017), ‘Reflections on neighbourhood planning: towards a progressive localism’, in S. Brownill and Q. Bradley (eds), Localism and neighbourhood planning: Power to the people?, Bristol, Policy Press, 251–67. Reflections on neighbourhood planning: towards a progressive localism Localism and neighbourhood planning: Power to the people? 251 67 Google Scholar

BRADLEY, Q., BURNETT, A. and SPARLING, W. (2017), ‘Neighbourhood planning and the spatial practices of localism’ in Brownill and Bradley (eds), 57–74. Neighbourhood planning and the spatial practices of localism 57 74 Google Scholar

BRADLEY, Q. and SPARLING, W. (2017), ‘The impact of neighbourhood planning and localism on house-building in England’, Housing Theory and Society, 34, 106–18. The impact of neighbourhood planning and localism on house-building in England Housing Theory and Society 34 106 18 Google Scholar

BROOKFIELD, K. (2017), ‘Getting involved in plan-making: Participation in neighbourhood planning in England’, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35, 397–416. Getting involved in plan-making: Participation in neighbourhood planning in England Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35 397 416 Google Scholar

BROWNILL, S. (2017), ‘Assembling neighbourhoods: topologies of power and the reshaping of planning’, in Brownill and Bradley (eds), 145–62. Assembling neighbourhoods: topologies of power and the reshaping of planning 145 62 Google Scholar

BROWNILL, S. and DOWNING, L. (2013), ‘Neighbourhood plans – is an infrastructure of localism emerging?’, Town and Country Planning, 82, 372–76. Neighbourhood plans – is an infrastructure of localism emerging? Town and Country Planning 82 372 76 Google Scholar

COLENUTT, B. (2012), ‘Neighbourhood plans – who will benefit?’, Town and Country Planning, 81, 116–17. Neighbourhood plans – who will benefit? Town and Country Planning 81 116 17 Google Scholar

COLOMB, C. (2017), ‘Participation and conflict in the formation of Neighbourhood Areas and Forums in ‘super-diverse’ cities’, in Brownill and Bradley (eds), 127–44. Participation and conflict in the formation of Neighbourhood Areas and Forums in ‘super-diverse’ cities 127 44 Google Scholar

CONSERVATIVE PARTY (2009), Control Shift: Returning Power to Local Communities, London, Conservative Party. Google Scholar

CONSERVATIVE PARTY (2010), Open Source Planning, London, Conservative Party. Google Scholar

COWIE, P. (2017), ‘Performing planning: understanding community participation in planning through theatre’, Town Planning Review, 88, 401–21. Performing planning: understanding community participation in planning through theatre Town Planning Review 88 401 21 Google Scholar

COWIE, P. and DAVOUDI, S. (2015), ‘Is small really beautiful? The legitimacy of neighbourhood planning’, in Davoudi and Madanipour (eds), 168–89. Is small really beautiful? The legitimacy of neighbourhood planning 168 89 Google Scholar

COWIE, P., VIGAR, G., DAVOUDI, S. and MADANIPOUR, A. (2015), ‘Hyper-local planning in England: territorial governance at the neighbourhood scale’, in P. Schmitt and L. Van Well (eds), Territorial Governance across Europe: Pathways, Practices and Prospects, London, Routledge, 67–80. Hyper-local planning in England: territorial governance at the neighbourhood scale Territorial Governance across Europe: Pathways, Practices and Prospects 67 80 Google Scholar

COX, E. (2010), Five Foundations of Real Localism, IPPR discussion paper, Newcastle, IPPR North. Five Foundations of Real Localism Google Scholar

DAVOUDI, S. and COWIE, P. (2013), ‘Are English neighbourhood forums democratically legitimate?’, Planning Theory and Practice, 14, 562–66. Are English neighbourhood forums democratically legitimate? Planning Theory and Practice 14 562 66 Google Scholar

DAVOUDI, S. and MADANIPOUR, A. (2013), ‘Localism and neo-liberal governmentality’, Town Planning Review, 84, 551–62. Localism and neo-liberal governmentality Town Planning Review 84 551 62 Google Scholar

DAVOUDI, S. and MADANIPOUR, A. (eds) (2015), Reconsidering Localism, London, Routledge. Reconsidering Localism Google Scholar

DCLG (DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2011), A Plain English Guide to the Localism Act, London, DCLG. Google Scholar

DCLG (DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2016), Neighbourhood Planning: progress on housing delivery: October 2016 edition, London, DCLG. Google Scholar

DEFRA (DEPARTMENT FOR ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS) (2013), Neighbourhood Planning: The Rural Frontrunners: Research and Case Studies, London, DEFRA. Google Scholar

FARNSWORTH, D. (2012), ‘Who will control localism?’, Town and Country Planning, 81, 20–23. Who will control localism? Town and Country Planning 81 20 23 Google Scholar

FEATHERSTONE, D., INCE, A., MACKINNON, D., STRAUSS, K. and CUMBERS, A. (2012), ‘Progressive localism and the construction of political alternatives’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, 188–202. Progressive localism and the construction of political alternatives Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37 188 202 Google Scholar

FIELD, M. and LAYARD, A. (2017), ‘Locating community-led housing within neighbourhood plans as a response to England’s housing needs’, Public Money and Management, 37, 105–12. Locating community-led housing within neighbourhood plans as a response to England’s housing needs Public Money and Management 37 105 12 Google Scholar

GALLENT, N. (2013), ‘Re-connecting “people and planning”: parish plans and the English Localism agenda’, Town Planning Review, 84, 371–96. Re-connecting “people and planning”: parish plans and the English Localism agenda Town Planning Review 84 371 96 Google Scholar

GALLENT, N., HAMIDUDDIN, I. and MADEDDU, M. (2013), ‘Localism, down-scaling and the strategic dilemmas confronting planning in England’, Town Planning Review, 84, 563–82. Localism, down-scaling and the strategic dilemmas confronting planning in England Town Planning Review 84 563 82 Google Scholar

GALLENT, N. and ROBINSON, S. (2012), Neighbourhood Planning: Communities, Networks and Governance, Bristol, Policy Press. Neighbourhood Planning: Communities, Networks and Governance Google Scholar

GUNN, S., BROOKS, E. and VIGAR, G. (2015), ‘The community’s capacity to plan: the disproportionate requirements of the new English Neighbourhood Planning initiative’, in Davoudi and Madanipour (eds), 147–67. The community’s capacity to plan: the disproportionate requirements of the new English Neighbourhood Planning initiative 147 67 Google Scholar

HEALEY, P. (2015), ‘Civic capacity, place governance and progressive localism’, in Davoudi and Madanipour (eds), 105–25. Civic capacity, place governance and progressive localism 105 25 Google Scholar

HOLMAN, N. and RYDIN, Y. (2013), ‘What can social capital tell us about planning under localism?’, Local Government Studies, 39, 71–88. What can social capital tell us about planning under localism? Local Government Studies 39 71 88 Google Scholar

INCH, A. (2015), ‘Ordinary citizens and the political cultures of planning: in search of the subject of a new democratic ethos’, Planning Theory, 14, 404–24. Ordinary citizens and the political cultures of planning: in search of the subject of a new democratic ethos Planning Theory 14 404 24 Google Scholar

LOCALITY (2018), People Power: Findings from the Commission on the Future of Localism, London, Locality. Google Scholar

LORD, A., MAIR, M., STURZAKER, J. and JONES, P. (2017), ‘The planners’ dream goes wrong? Questioning citizen-centred planning’, Local Government Studies, 43, 344–63. The planners’ dream goes wrong? Questioning citizen-centred planning Local Government Studies 43 344 63 Google Scholar

LOWNDES, V. and SULLIVAN, H. (2004), ‘Like a horse and carriage or a fish on a bicycle: how well do local partnerships and public participation go together?’, Local Government Studies, 30, 51–73. Like a horse and carriage or a fish on a bicycle: how well do local partnerships and public participation go together? Local Government Studies 30 51 73 Google Scholar

LUDWIG, C. and LUDWIG, G. (2014), ‘Empty gestures? A review of the discourses of “localism” from the practitioner’s perspective’, Local Economy, 29, 192–203. Empty gestures? A review of the discourses of “localism” from the practitioner’s perspective Local Economy 29 192 203 Google Scholar

MACE, A. and TEWDWR-JONES, M. (2017), ‘Neighbourhood planning, participation and rational choice’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17727334 (accessed 16 May 2018). Google Scholar

MANSBRIDGE, J. (1983), Beyond Adversary Democracy, New York, Basic Books. Beyond Adversary Democracy Google Scholar

MATTHEWS, P. (2012), ‘From area-based initiatives to strategic partnerships: have we lost the meaning of regeneration?’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30, 147–61. From area-based initiatives to strategic partnerships: have we lost the meaning of regeneration? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30 147 61 Google Scholar

MATTHEWS, P., BRAMLEY, G. and HASTINGS, A. (2015), ‘Homo economicus in a Big Society: understanding middle-class activism and NIMBYism towards new housing developments’, Housing, Theory and Society, 32, 54–72. Homo economicus in a Big Society: understanding middle-class activism and NIMBYism towards new housing developments Housing, Theory and Society 32 54 72 Google Scholar

MATTHEWS, P. and HASTINGS, A. (2013), ‘Middle-class political activism and middle-class advantage in relation to public services: a realist synthesis of the evidence base’, Social Policy & Administration, 47, 72–92. Middle-class political activism and middle-class advantage in relation to public services: a realist synthesis of the evidence base Social Policy & Administration 47 72 92 Google Scholar

MCGUINNESS, D. and LUDWIG, C. (2017), ‘Developing a neighbourhood plan: stories from “community-led” planning pathfinders’, in Brownill and Bradley (eds), 95–111. Developing a neighbourhood plan: stories from “community-led” planning pathfinders 95 111 Google Scholar

MITLIN, D. (2008), ‘With and beyond the state: coproduction as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations’, Environment and Urbanization, 20, 339–60. With and beyond the state: coproduction as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations Environment and Urbanization 20 339 60 Google Scholar

NATARAJAN, L. (2017), ‘Socio-spatial learning: a case study of community knowledge in participatory spatial planning’, Progress in Planning, 111, 1–23. Socio-spatial learning: a case study of community knowledge in participatory spatial planning Progress in Planning 111 1 23 Google Scholar

NEWMAN, J. (2014), ‘Landscapes of antagonism: local governance, neo-liberalism and austerity’, Urban Studies, 51, 3290–305. Landscapes of antagonism: local governance, neo-liberalism and austerity Urban Studies 51 3290 305 Google Scholar

PARKER, G. (2008), ‘Parish and community-led planning, local empowerment and local evidence bases’, Town Planning Review, 79, 61–85. Parish and community-led planning, local empowerment and local evidence bases Town Planning Review 79 61 85 Google Scholar

PARKER G., LYNN, T. and WARGENT, M. (2014), User Experience of Neighbourhood Planning in England, London, Locality. User Experience of Neighbourhood Planning in England Google Scholar

PARKER, G., LYNN, T. and WARGENT, M. (2015), ‘Sticking to the script? The co-production of neighbourhood planning in England’, Town Planning Review, 86, 519–36. Sticking to the script? The co-production of neighbourhood planning in England Town Planning Review 86 519 36 Google Scholar

PARKER, G., LYNN, T. and WARGENT, M. (2017), ‘Contestation and conservatism in neighbourhood planning in england: reconciling agonism and collaboration?’, Planning Theory & Practice, 17, 446–65. Contestation and conservatism in neighbourhood planning in england: reconciling agonism and collaboration? Planning Theory & Practice 17 446 65 Google Scholar

PARKER, G. and MURRAY, C. (2012), ‘Beyond tokenism? Community-led planning and rational choices: findings from participants in local agenda-setting at the neighbourhood scale in England’, Town Planning Review, 83, 1–28. Beyond tokenism? Community-led planning and rational choices: findings from participants in local agenda-setting at the neighbourhood scale in England Town Planning Review 83 1 28 Google Scholar

PARKER, G. and SALTER, K. (2016), ‘Five years of neighbourhood planning. A review of take-up and distribution’, Town and Country Planning, 85, 181–88. Five years of neighbourhood planning. A review of take-up and distribution Town and Country Planning 85 181 88 Google Scholar

PARKER, G. and SALTER, K. (2017), ‘Taking stock of neighbourhood planning 2011–2016’, Planning Practice and Research, 32, 478–90. Taking stock of neighbourhood planning 2011–2016 Planning Practice and Research 32 478 90 Google Scholar

PARKER, G., SALTER, K. and HICKMAN, H. (2016), ‘Caution: examinations in progress. the operation of neighbourhood development plan examinations’, Town and Country Planning, 85, 516–22. Caution: examinations in progress. the operation of neighbourhood development plan examinations Town and Country Planning 85 516 22 Google Scholar

PARKER, G. and STREET, E. (2015), ‘Planning at the neighbourhood scale: localism, dialogic politics and the modulation of community action’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33, 794–810. Planning at the neighbourhood scale: localism, dialogic politics and the modulation of community action Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33 794 810 Google Scholar

PARKER, G. and STREET, E. (2017), ‘Neo-advocacy for neo-liberal times: Planning Aid and the Advocacy Project in England’, Town Planning Review, 88, 443–63. Neo-advocacy for neo-liberal times: Planning Aid and the Advocacy Project in England Town Planning Review 88 443 63 Google Scholar

PARKER, G. and STREET, E. (2018), Enabling Participatory Planning. Planning Aid and Advocacy in Neo-liberal Times, Bristol, Policy Press. Enabling Participatory Planning. Planning Aid and Advocacy in Neo-liberal Times Google Scholar

PARKER, G. STREET, E. and WARGENT, M. (2018), ‘Advocates, advisors and scrutineers: the technocracies of private sector planning in England’, in M. Raco and F. Savini (eds), Planning and Knowledge: How New Forms of Technocracy Are Shaping Contemporary Cities, Bristol, Policy Press, in press. Advocates, advisors and scrutineers: the technocracies of private sector planning in England Planning and Knowledge: How New Forms of Technocracy Are Shaping Contemporary Cities Google Scholar

PARKER, G. and WARGENT, M. (2017), Participant Experience of Neighbourhood Planning in England (Working Papers in Real Estate & Planning 01/17), Reading, University of Reading. Participant Experience of Neighbourhood Planning in England Google Scholar

PROSSER, B., RENWICK, A., GIOVANNINI, A., SANDFORD, M., FLINDERS, M., JENNINGS, W., SMITH, G., SPADA, P., STOKER, G. and GHOSE, K. (2017), ‘Citizen participation and changing governance: cases of devolution in England’, Policy & Politics, 45, 251–69. Citizen participation and changing governance: cases of devolution in England Policy & Politics 45 251 69 Google Scholar

STANIER, R. (2014), ‘Neighbourhood planning’, 42nd Joint Planning Law Conference Oxford, 19th–21st September 2014. Neighbourhood planning Google Scholar

STANTON, J. (2014), ‘The Big Society and community development: neighbourhood planning under the Localism Act’, Environmental Law Review, 16, 262–76. The Big Society and community development: neighbourhood planning under the Localism Act Environmental Law Review 16 262 76 Google Scholar

STURZAKER, J. (2011), ‘Can community empowerment reduce opposition to housing? Evidence from rural England’, Planning Practice and Research, 26, 555–70. Can community empowerment reduce opposition to housing? Evidence from rural England Planning Practice and Research 26 555 70 Google Scholar

STURZAKER, J. and GORDON, M. (2017), ‘Democratic tensions in decentralised planning – rhetoric, legislation and reality in England’, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35, 1324–39. Democratic tensions in decentralised planning – rhetoric, legislation and reality in England Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35 1324 39 Google Scholar

STURZAKER, J. and SHAW, D. (2015), ‘Localism in practice: lessons from a pioneer neighbourhood plan in England’, Town Planning Review, 86, 587–609. Localism in practice: lessons from a pioneer neighbourhood plan in England Town Planning Review 86 587 609 Google Scholar

TAIT, M. and INCH, A. (2015), ‘Putting localism in place: conservative images of the good community and the contradictions of planning reform in England’, Planning Practice and Research, 31, 174–94. Putting localism in place: conservative images of the good community and the contradictions of planning reform in England Planning Practice and Research 31 174 94 Google Scholar

VIGAR, G. (2013), ‘Promoting fairer neighbourhood planning’, in K. Shaw and J. Blackie (eds), New Directions in Planning: Beyond Localism, Newcastle, Northumbria University, 73–79. Promoting fairer neighbourhood planning New Directions in Planning: Beyond Localism 73 79 Google Scholar

VIGAR, G., GUNN, S. and BROOKS, E. (2017), ‘Governing our neighbours: participation and conflict in neighbourhood planning’, Town Planning Review, 88, 423–42. Governing our neighbours: participation and conflict in neighbourhood planning Town Planning Review 88 423 42 Google Scholar

WILLIAMS, A., GOODWIN, M. and CLOKE, P. (2014), ‘Neo-liberalism, Big Society and progressive localism’, Environment and Planning A, 46, 2798–815. Neo-liberalism, Big Society and progressive localism Environment and Planning A 46 2798 815 Google Scholar