References

ADAIR, A., CROSBY, N., HEMPHILL, L., LAY CHENG LIM, J. and McGREAL, S. (2014), The Role of International and Local Valuation Standards in Influencing Valuation Practice in Emerging and Established Markets (RICS research report). Google Scholar

ADAMS, D. and TOLSON, S. (2019), ‘Valuation in the dark: constructing perceptions of normality in failing markets’, Town Planning Review, 90, 383–406. Google Scholar

ADLER, D. (2017), Home Truths: A Progressive Vision of Housing Policy in the 21st Century, Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, https://institute.global/insight/renewing-centre/hometruths-progressive-vision-housing-policy-21st-century (accessed 6 May 2019). Google Scholar

ALTERMAN, R. (2012), ‘Land use regulations and property values: the “windfalls capture” idea revisited’, in N. Brooks, K. Donaghy and G.-J. Knaap (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Urban Economics and Planning, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 755–86. Google Scholar

BOOTH, P. (2012), ‘The unearned increment: property and the capture of betterment value in Britain and France’, in G. K. Ingram and Y.-H. Hong (eds), Value Capture and Land Policies, Massachusetts, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 74–93. Google Scholar

CATNEY, P. and HENNEBERRY, J. (2019), ‘Change in the political economy of land value capture in England’, Town Planning Review, 90, 339–58. Google Scholar

CHO, S. and CHOI, P. P. (2014), ‘Introducing property tax in China as an alternative financing source’, Land Use Policy, 38, 580–86. Google Scholar

CROOK, A. D. H. and WHITEHEAD, C. (2019), ‘Capturing development value, principles and practice: why is it so difficult?’, Town Planning Review, 90, 359–81. Google Scholar

CROOK, T. (2016), ‘Capturing development value through de jure national taxation’, in A. D. H. Crook, C. Whitehead and J. Henneberry (eds), Planning Gain: Providing Infrastructure and Affordable Housing, Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell, 37–62. Google Scholar

CROSBY, N. (2019), ‘Development viability assessment and the provision of affordable housing: a game of “pass the parcel”?’, Town Planning Review, 90, 407–28. Google Scholar

CROSBY, N. and HENNEBERRY, J. (2016), ‘Financialisation, the valuation of investment property and the urban built environment in the UK’, Urban Studies, 53, 1424–41. Google Scholar

DEMETRIOU, D. (2015), ‘A GIS-based hedonic price model for agricultural land’, Proc. SPIE 9535: Third International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment (RSCy2015), 95350B (19 June 2015), doi: 10.1117/12.2192498, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2192498 (accessed 23 May 2019). Google Scholar

DUNNING, R. J., FERRARI, E. and WATKINS, C. (2016), ‘Spatial variation in the incidence and value of planning obligations’, in Crook et al. (eds), 175–200. Google Scholar

DUNNING, R. J., LORD, A., KESKIN, B. and BUCK, M. (2019), ‘Is there a relationship between planning culture and the value of planning gain? Evidence from England’, Town Planning Review, 90, 453–71. Google Scholar

GOODCHILD, B., BOOTH, C. and HENNEBERRY, J. (1996), ‘Impact fees: a review of alternatives and their implications for planning practice in Britain’, Town Planning Review, 67, 161–81. Google Scholar

GOODFELLOW, T. (2017), ‘Taxing property in a neo-developmental state: the politics of urban land value capture in Rwanda and Ethiopia’, African Affairs, 116, 549–72. Google Scholar

GUY, S. and HENNEBERRY, J. (eds) (2002), Development and Developers: Perspectives on Property, Oxford, Blackwell Science. Google Scholar

HENNEBERRY, J. (2016), ‘Development viability’, in Crook et al. (eds), 115–39. Google Scholar

HENNEBERRY, J. and MOUZAKIS, F. (2014), ‘Familiarity and the determination of yields for regional office property investments in the UK’, Regional Studies, 48, 530–46. Google Scholar

HENNEBERRY, J. and ROBERTS, C. (2008), ‘Calculated inequality? Portfolio benchmarking and regional office property investment in the UK’, Urban Studies, 45, 1217–41. Google Scholar

INFRASTRUCTURE AUSTRALIA (2016), ‘Capturing value: advice on making value capture work in Australia’, https://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/policy-publications/publications/files/Capturing_Value-Advice_on_making_value_capture_work_in_Australia-acc.pdf (accessed 6 May 2019). Google Scholar

JONES, C. MORGAN, J. and STEPHENS, M. (2018), An Assessment of Historic Attempts to Capture Land Value Uplift in the UK, Scottish Land Commission. Google Scholar

LORD, A., DUNNING, R., DOCKERILL, B., CARRO, A., BURGESS, G., CROOK, A., WATKINS, C. and WHITEHEAD, C. M. E. (2018), The Incidence, Value and Delivery of Planning Obligations in England in 2016–17, London, Department of Communities and Local Government. Google Scholar

McALLISTER, P. (2019), ‘The taxing problems of land value capture, planning obligations and viability tests: some reasonable models?’, Town Planning Review, 90, 429–51. Google Scholar

McCLUSKEY, W. J. and FRANSZEN, R. C. D. (2005), Land Value Taxation: An Applied Analysis, Aldershot, Ashgate. Google Scholar

RICS (2017), International Valuation Standards, https://www.rics.org/globalassets/rics-website/media/upholding-professional-standards/sector-standards/valuation/internationalvaluation-standards-rics.pdf (accessed 5 May 2019). Google Scholar

SCOTTISH LAND COMMISSION (2018), ‘Land value capture to have a proactive role in place making’, Scottish Land Commission, https://landcommission.gov.scot/tag/land-value-capture/ (accessed 22 July 2019). Google Scholar

SHELTER (2017), A Consensus Is Emerging on Land Value Capture: What We Need Now Is Political Action, 24 August 2017, http://blog.shelter.org.uk/2017/08/a-consensus-is-emerging-onland-value-capture-what-we-need-now-is-political-action (accessed 24 May 2019). Google Scholar

TRANSPORT FOR LONDON (2017), Land Value Capture (final report), https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/land_value_capture_report_transport_for_london.pdf (accessed 24 May 2019). Google Scholar

WOESTENBURG, A. K., VAN DER KRABBEN, E. and SPIT, T. J. M. (2018), ‘Land policy discretion in times of economic downturn: how local authorities adapt to a new reality’, Land Use Policy, 77, 801–10. Google Scholar