ADELLE, C., JORDAN, A. and TURNPENNY, J. (2012), ‘Proceeding in parallel or drifting apart? A systematic review of policy appraisal research and practices’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30, 401–15. Proceeding in parallel or drifting apart? A systematic review of policy appraisal research and practices Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30 401 15 Google Scholar

ADELLE, C. and WEILAND, S. (2012), ‘Policy assessment: the state of the art’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30, 25–33. Policy assessment: the state of the art Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 30 25 33 Google Scholar

ALLMENDINGER, P. and HAUGHTON, G. (2012), ‘Post-political spatial planning in England: a crisis of consensus?’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, 89–103. Post-political spatial planning in England: a crisis of consensus? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37 89 103 Google Scholar

BIDSTRUP, M. and HANSEN, A. M. (2014), ‘The paradox of strategic environmental assessment’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 47, 29–35. The paradox of strategic environmental assessment Environmental Impact Assessment Review 47 29 35 Google Scholar

BRAUN, V. and CLARKE, V. (2006), ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. Using thematic analysis in psychology Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 77 101 Google Scholar

BROWN, A. L. and THERIVEL, R. (2000), ‘Principles to guide the development of SEA methodology’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18, 183–89. Principles to guide the development of SEA methodology Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 18 183 89 Google Scholar

CASHMORE, M. (2004), ‘The role of science in environmental impact assessment: process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24, 403–26. The role of science in environmental impact assessment: process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24 403 26 Google Scholar

CASHMORE, M., BOND, A. and COBB, D. (2007), ‘The contribution of environmental assessment to sustainable development: toward a richer empirical understanding’, Environmental Management, 40, 516–30. The contribution of environmental assessment to sustainable development: toward a richer empirical understanding Environmental Management 40 516 30 Google Scholar

CASHMORE, M., BOND, A. and COBB, D. (2008), ‘The role and functioning of environmental assessment: theoretical reflections upon an empirical investigation of causation’, Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 1233–48. The role and functioning of environmental assessment: theoretical reflections upon an empirical investigation of causation Journal of Environmental Management 88 1233 48 Google Scholar

COWELL, R. and OWENS, S. (2006), ‘Governing space: planning reform and the politics of sustainability’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24, 403–21. Governing space: planning reform and the politics of sustainability Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24 403 21 Google Scholar

ELLING, B. (2009), ‘Rationality and effectiveness: does EIA/SEA treat them as synonyms?’, Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal, 27, 121–31. Rationality and effectiveness: does EIA/SEA treat them as synonyms? Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal 27 121 31 Google Scholar

FAZEY, I., EVELY, A. C., REED, M. S., STRINGER, L. C., KRUIJSEN, J., WHITE, P. C. L., NEWSHAM, A., JIN, L., CORTAZZI, M., PHILLIPSON, J., BLACKSTOCK, K., ENTWISTLE, N., SHEATE, W., ARMSTRONG, F., BLACKMORE, C., FAZEY, J., INGRAM, J., GREGSON, J. O. N., LOWE, P., MORTON, S. and TREVITT, C. (2013), ‘Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management’, Environmental Conservation, 40, 19–36. Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management Environmental Conservation 40 19 36 Google Scholar

FISCHER, T. (2003), ‘Strategic environmental assessment in post-modern times’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 155–70. Strategic environmental assessment in post-modern times Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23 155 70 Google Scholar

FISCHER, T. (2007), Theory and Practice of SEA: Towards a More Systematic Approach, London, Earthscan. Theory and Practice of SEA: Towards a More Systematic Approach Google Scholar

GIDDENS, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Structuration Theory, Cambridge, Polity. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Structuration Theory Google Scholar

GLASSON, J., THERIVEL, R. and CHADWICK, A. (2005), Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment, London, Routledge. Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment Google Scholar

HAJER, M. A. and WAGENAAR, H. (2003), Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society Google Scholar

HANSEN, A. M., KØRNØV, L., CASHMORE, M. and RICHARDSON, T. (2013), ‘The significance of structural power in strategic environmental assessment’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 39, 37–45. The significance of structural power in strategic environmental assessment Environmental Impact Assessment Review 39 37 45 Google Scholar

HAYES, S. (2013), Strategic Assessment in England and Scotland: Analysing the Contribution to Sustainability, PhD, University of Manchester. Strategic Assessment in England and Scotland: Analysing the Contribution to Sustainability Google Scholar

HAYES, S. J., BARKER, A. and JONES, C. E. (2017), ‘Re-examining the rationale for strategic assessment: an evaluation of purpose in two systems’, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 19, 1750020-1–26. Re-examining the rationale for strategic assessment: an evaluation of purpose in two systems Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 19 1750020-1 26 Google Scholar

HEALEY, P. (1998), ‘Collaborative planning in a stakeholder society’, Town Planning Review, 69, 1–21. Collaborative planning in a stakeholder society Town Planning Review 69 1 21 Google Scholar

HEALEY, P. (2006), Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies Google Scholar

HEALEY, P. (2012), ‘Communicative planning: practices, concepts, and rhetorics’, in B. Sanyal, L. J. Vale and C. D. Rosan (eds), Planning Ideas That Matter: Livability, Territoriality, Governance, and Reflective Practice, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 333–57. Communicative planning: practices, concepts, and rhetorics Planning Ideas That Matter: Livability, Territoriality, Governance, and Reflective Practice 333 57 Google Scholar

HERTIN, J., TURNPENNY, J., JORDAN, A., NILSSON, M., RUSSEL, D. and NYKVIST, B. (2009), ‘Rationalising the policy mess? Ex ante policy assessment and the utilisation of knowledge in the policy process’, Environment and Planning A, 41, 1185–1200. Rationalising the policy mess? Ex ante policy assessment and the utilisation of knowledge in the policy process Environment and Planning A 41 1185 1200 Google Scholar

ILLSLEY, B., JACKSON, T. and DEASLEY, N. (2014), ‘Spheres of public conversation: experiences in strategic environmental assessment’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 44, 1–10. Spheres of public conversation: experiences in strategic environmental assessment Environmental Impact Assessment Review 44 1 10 Google Scholar

INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES (1980), World Conservation Strategy: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development, Gland, Switzerland, IUCN, UNEP and WWF. Google Scholar

JHA-THAKUR, U., GAZZOLA, P., PEEL, D., FISCHER, T. B. and KIDD, S. (2009), ‘Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment: the significance of learning’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27, 133–44. Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment: the significance of learning Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 27 133 44 Google Scholar

KICKERT, W. J. M., KLIJN, E. H. and KOPPENJAN, J. F. M. (1997), Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector, London, Sage. Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector Google Scholar

KØRNØV, L. and THISSEN, W. (2000), ‘Rationality in decision- and policy-making: implications for strategic environmental assessment’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18, 191–200. Rationality in decision- and policy-making: implications for strategic environmental assessment Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 18 191 200 Google Scholar

LEE, N. (2002), ‘Integrated approaches to impact assessment: substance or make-believe?’, in L. Billing, C. Jones, B. Sadler, J. Walmsley and C. Wood (eds), Environmental Assessment Yearbook, Lincoln and Manchester, Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment and the EIA Centre, University of Manchester, 14–20. Integrated approaches to impact assessment: substance or make-believe? Environmental Assessment Yearbook 14 20 Google Scholar

LEE, N. (2006), ‘Bridging the gap between theory and practice in integrated assessment’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26, 57–78. Bridging the gap between theory and practice in integrated assessment Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26 57 78 Google Scholar

LEE, N. and KIRKPATRICK, C. (2000), ‘Integrated appraisal, decision making and sustainable development: an overview’, in N. Lee and C. Kirkpatrick (eds), Sustainable Development and Integrated Appraisal in a Developing World, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 1–19. Integrated appraisal, decision making and sustainable development: an overview Sustainable Development and Integrated Appraisal in a Developing World 1 19 Google Scholar

LEE, N. and WALSH, F. (1992), ‘SEA: an overview’, Project Appraisal, 7, 126–36. SEA: an overview Project Appraisal 7 126 36 Google Scholar

LEVI-FAUR, D. (2006), ‘A question of size? A heuristics for stepwise comparative research design’, in B. Rihoux and H. Grimm (eds), Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis: Beyond the Quantitative–Qualitative Divide, New York, Springer, 43–66. A question of size? A heuristics for stepwise comparative research design Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis: Beyond the Quantitative–Qualitative Divide 43 66 Google Scholar

LOBOS, V. and PARTIDÁRIO, M. (2014), ‘Theory versus practice in strategic environmental assessment (SEA)’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 48, 34–46. Theory versus practice in strategic environmental assessment (SEA) Environmental Impact Assessment Review 48 34 46 Google Scholar

LOCAL PLANS EXPERT GROUP (2016), Local Plans: Report to the Communities Secretary and to the Minister of Housing and Planning, London, Local Plans Expert Group, http://lpeg.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Local-plans-report-to-governement.pdf (accessed 6 December 2018). Google Scholar

NITZ, T. and BROWN, A. (2001), ‘SEA must learn how policy making works’, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management, 3, 329–42. SEA must learn how policy making works Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management 3 329 42 Google Scholar

OWENS, S. and COWELL, R. (2002), Land and Limits: Interpreting Sustainability in the Planning Process, London, Routledge. Land and Limits: Interpreting Sustainability in the Planning Process Google Scholar

PERÄKYLÄ, A. and RUUSUVOURI, J. (2011), ‘Analyzing talk and text’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4th edn, London, Sage, 524–29. Analyzing talk and text The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research 524 29 Google Scholar

RICHARDSON, T. (2005), ‘Environmental assessment and planning theory: four short stories about power, multiple rationality, and ethics’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25, 341–65. Environmental assessment and planning theory: four short stories about power, multiple rationality, and ethics Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25 341 65 Google Scholar

ROBSON, C. (2011), Real World Research: A Resource for Users of Social Research Methods in Applied Settings, Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell. Real World Research: A Resource for Users of Social Research Methods in Applied Settings Google Scholar

RUNHAAR, H. and DRIESSEN, P. P. J. (2007), ‘What makes SEA successful environmental assessment? The role of context in the contribution of SEA to decision-making’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 25, 2–14. What makes SEA successful environmental assessment? The role of context in the contribution of SEA to decision-making Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 25 2 14 Google Scholar

SAARELA, S. R., SÖDERMAN, T. and LYYTIMÄKI, J. (2015), ‘Knowledge brokerage context factors: what matters in knowledge exchange in impact assessment?’, Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 325–37. Knowledge brokerage context factors: what matters in knowledge exchange in impact assessment? Environmental Science & Policy 51 325 37 Google Scholar

SHEATE, W. R., DAGG, S., RICHARDSON, J., ASCHEMANN, R., PALERM, J. and STEEN, U. (2003), ‘Integrating the environment into strategic decision-making: conceptualizing policy SEA’, European Environment, 13, 1–18. Integrating the environment into strategic decision-making: conceptualizing policy SEA European Environment 13 1 18 Google Scholar

SHEATE, W. R. and PARTIDÁRIO, M. R. (2010), ‘Strategic approaches and assessment techniques: potential for knowledge brokerage towards sustainability’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30, 278–88. Strategic approaches and assessment techniques: potential for knowledge brokerage towards sustainability Environmental Impact Assessment Review 30 278 88 Google Scholar

SEWELL, W. H. (1992), ‘A theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformation’, American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1–29. A theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformation American Journal of Sociology 98 1 29 Google Scholar

VERHEEM, R. and TONK, J. (2000), ‘SEA: one concept, multiple forms’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18, 177–82. SEA: one concept, multiple forms Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 18 177 82 Google Scholar

VERMA, N. (1996), ‘Pragmatic rationality and planning theory’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16, 5–14. Pragmatic rationality and planning theory Journal of Planning Education and Research 16 5 14 Google Scholar

VICENTE, G. and PARTIDÁRIO, M. R. (2006), ‘SEA: enhancing communication for better environmental decisions’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26, 696–706. SEA: enhancing communication for better environmental decisions Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26 696 706 Google Scholar

WESTON, J. (2004), ‘EIA in a risk society’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47, 313–25. EIA in a risk society Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 47 313 25 Google Scholar

WILKINS, H. (2003), ‘The need for subjectivity in EIA: discourse as a tool for sustainable development’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 401–14. The need for subjectivity in EIA: discourse as a tool for sustainable development Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23 401 14 Google Scholar

WORLD COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT (1987), Our Common Future, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

YIN, R. (2009), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, London, Sage. Case Study Research: Design and Methods Google Scholar