ADELLE, C., JORDAN, A. and TURNPENNY, J. (2012), ‘Proceeding in parallel or drifting apart? A systematic review of policy appraisal research and practices’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30, 401–15.
Proceeding in parallel or drifting apart? A systematic review of policy appraisal research and practices
Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy
30
401
15
ADELLE, C. and WEILAND, S. (2012), ‘Policy assessment: the state of the art’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30, 25–33.
Policy assessment: the state of the art
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
30
25
33
ALLMENDINGER, P. and HAUGHTON, G. (2012), ‘Post-political spatial planning in England: a crisis of consensus?’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, 89–103.
Post-political spatial planning in England: a crisis of consensus?
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
37
89
103
BIDSTRUP, M. and HANSEN, A. M. (2014), ‘The paradox of strategic environmental assessment’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 47, 29–35.
The paradox of strategic environmental assessment
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
47
29
35
BRAUN, V. and CLARKE, V. (2006), ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Qualitative Research in Psychology
3
77
101
BROWN, A. L. and THERIVEL, R. (2000), ‘Principles to guide the development of SEA methodology’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18, 183–89.
Principles to guide the development of SEA methodology
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
18
183
89
CASHMORE, M. (2004), ‘The role of science in environmental impact assessment: process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24, 403–26.
The role of science in environmental impact assessment: process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
24
403
26
CASHMORE, M., BOND, A. and COBB, D. (2007), ‘The contribution of environmental assessment to sustainable development: toward a richer empirical understanding’, Environmental Management, 40, 516–30.
The contribution of environmental assessment to sustainable development: toward a richer empirical understanding
Environmental Management
40
516
30
CASHMORE, M., BOND, A. and COBB, D. (2008), ‘The role and functioning of environmental assessment: theoretical reflections upon an empirical investigation of causation’, Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 1233–48.
The role and functioning of environmental assessment: theoretical reflections upon an empirical investigation of causation
Journal of Environmental Management
88
1233
48
COWELL, R. and OWENS, S. (2006), ‘Governing space: planning reform and the politics of sustainability’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24, 403–21.
Governing space: planning reform and the politics of sustainability
Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy
24
403
21
ELLING, B. (2009), ‘Rationality and effectiveness: does EIA/SEA treat them as synonyms?’, Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal, 27, 121–31.
Rationality and effectiveness: does EIA/SEA treat them as synonyms?
Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal
27
121
31
FAZEY, I., EVELY, A. C., REED, M. S., STRINGER, L. C., KRUIJSEN, J., WHITE, P. C. L., NEWSHAM, A., JIN, L., CORTAZZI, M., PHILLIPSON, J., BLACKSTOCK, K., ENTWISTLE, N., SHEATE, W., ARMSTRONG, F., BLACKMORE, C., FAZEY, J., INGRAM, J., GREGSON, J. O. N., LOWE, P., MORTON, S. and TREVITT, C. (2013), ‘Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management’, Environmental Conservation, 40, 19–36.
Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management
Environmental Conservation
40
19
36
FISCHER, T. (2003), ‘Strategic environmental assessment in post-modern times’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 155–70.
Strategic environmental assessment in post-modern times
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
23
155
70
FISCHER, T. (2007), Theory and Practice of SEA: Towards a More Systematic Approach, London, Earthscan.
Theory and Practice of SEA: Towards a More Systematic Approach
GIDDENS, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Structuration Theory, Cambridge, Polity.
The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Structuration Theory
GLASSON, J., THERIVEL, R. and CHADWICK, A. (2005), Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment, London, Routledge.
Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment
HAJER, M. A. and WAGENAAR, H. (2003), Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society
HANSEN, A. M., KØRNØV, L., CASHMORE, M. and RICHARDSON, T. (2013), ‘The significance of structural power in strategic environmental assessment’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 39, 37–45.
The significance of structural power in strategic environmental assessment
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
39
37
45
HAYES, S. (2013), Strategic Assessment in England and Scotland: Analysing the Contribution to Sustainability, PhD, University of Manchester.
Strategic Assessment in England and Scotland: Analysing the Contribution to Sustainability
HAYES, S. J., BARKER, A. and JONES, C. E. (2017), ‘Re-examining the rationale for strategic assessment: an evaluation of purpose in two systems’, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 19, 1750020-1–26.
Re-examining the rationale for strategic assessment: an evaluation of purpose in two systems
Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management
19
1750020-1
26
HEALEY, P. (1998), ‘Collaborative planning in a stakeholder society’, Town Planning Review, 69, 1–21.
Collaborative planning in a stakeholder society
Town Planning Review
69
1
21
HEALEY, P. (2006), Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies
HEALEY, P. (2012), ‘Communicative planning: practices, concepts, and rhetorics’, in B. Sanyal, L. J. Vale and C. D. Rosan (eds), Planning Ideas That Matter: Livability, Territoriality, Governance, and Reflective Practice, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 333–57.
Communicative planning: practices, concepts, and rhetorics
Planning Ideas That Matter: Livability, Territoriality, Governance, and Reflective Practice
333
57
HERTIN, J., TURNPENNY, J., JORDAN, A., NILSSON, M., RUSSEL, D. and NYKVIST, B. (2009), ‘Rationalising the policy mess? Ex ante policy assessment and the utilisation of knowledge in the policy process’, Environment and Planning A, 41, 1185–1200.
Rationalising the policy mess? Ex ante policy assessment and the utilisation of knowledge in the policy process
Environment and Planning A
41
1185
1200
ILLSLEY, B., JACKSON, T. and DEASLEY, N. (2014), ‘Spheres of public conversation: experiences in strategic environmental assessment’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 44, 1–10.
Spheres of public conversation: experiences in strategic environmental assessment
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
44
1
10
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES (1980), World Conservation Strategy: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development, Gland, Switzerland, IUCN, UNEP and WWF.
JHA-THAKUR, U., GAZZOLA, P., PEEL, D., FISCHER, T. B. and KIDD, S. (2009), ‘Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment: the significance of learning’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27, 133–44.
Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment: the significance of learning
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
27
133
44
KICKERT, W. J. M., KLIJN, E. H. and KOPPENJAN, J. F. M. (1997), Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector, London, Sage.
Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector
KØRNØV, L. and THISSEN, W. (2000), ‘Rationality in decision- and policy-making: implications for strategic environmental assessment’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18, 191–200.
Rationality in decision- and policy-making: implications for strategic environmental assessment
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
18
191
200
LEE, N. (2002), ‘Integrated approaches to impact assessment: substance or make-believe?’, in L. Billing, C. Jones, B. Sadler, J. Walmsley and C. Wood (eds), Environmental Assessment Yearbook, Lincoln and Manchester, Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment and the EIA Centre, University of Manchester, 14–20.
Integrated approaches to impact assessment: substance or make-believe?
Environmental Assessment Yearbook
14
20
LEE, N. (2006), ‘Bridging the gap between theory and practice in integrated assessment’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26, 57–78.
Bridging the gap between theory and practice in integrated assessment
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
26
57
78
LEE, N. and KIRKPATRICK, C. (2000), ‘Integrated appraisal, decision making and sustainable development: an overview’, in N. Lee and C. Kirkpatrick (eds), Sustainable Development and Integrated Appraisal in a Developing World, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 1–19.
Integrated appraisal, decision making and sustainable development: an overview
Sustainable Development and Integrated Appraisal in a Developing World
1
19
LEE, N. and WALSH, F. (1992), ‘SEA: an overview’, Project Appraisal, 7, 126–36.
SEA: an overview
Project Appraisal
7
126
36
LEVI-FAUR, D. (2006), ‘A question of size? A heuristics for stepwise comparative research design’, in B. Rihoux and H. Grimm (eds), Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis: Beyond the Quantitative–Qualitative Divide, New York, Springer, 43–66.
A question of size? A heuristics for stepwise comparative research design
Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis: Beyond the Quantitative–Qualitative Divide
43
66
LOBOS, V. and PARTIDÁRIO, M. (2014), ‘Theory versus practice in strategic environmental assessment (SEA)’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 48, 34–46.
Theory versus practice in strategic environmental assessment (SEA)
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
48
34
46
LOCAL PLANS EXPERT GROUP (2016), Local Plans: Report to the Communities Secretary and to the Minister of Housing and Planning, London, Local Plans Expert Group, http://lpeg.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Local-plans-report-to-governement.pdf (accessed 6 December 2018).
NITZ, T. and BROWN, A. (2001), ‘SEA must learn how policy making works’, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management, 3, 329–42.
SEA must learn how policy making works
Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management
3
329
42
OWENS, S. and COWELL, R. (2002), Land and Limits: Interpreting Sustainability in the Planning Process, London, Routledge.
Land and Limits: Interpreting Sustainability in the Planning Process
PERÄKYLÄ, A. and RUUSUVOURI, J. (2011), ‘Analyzing talk and text’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4th edn, London, Sage, 524–29.
Analyzing talk and text
The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research
524
29
RICHARDSON, T. (2005), ‘Environmental assessment and planning theory: four short stories about power, multiple rationality, and ethics’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25, 341–65.
Environmental assessment and planning theory: four short stories about power, multiple rationality, and ethics
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
25
341
65
ROBSON, C. (2011), Real World Research: A Resource for Users of Social Research Methods in Applied Settings, Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell.
Real World Research: A Resource for Users of Social Research Methods in Applied Settings
RUNHAAR, H. and DRIESSEN, P. P. J. (2007), ‘What makes SEA successful environmental assessment? The role of context in the contribution of SEA to decision-making’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 25, 2–14.
What makes SEA successful environmental assessment? The role of context in the contribution of SEA to decision-making
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
25
2
14
SAARELA, S. R., SÖDERMAN, T. and LYYTIMÄKI, J. (2015), ‘Knowledge brokerage context factors: what matters in knowledge exchange in impact assessment?’, Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 325–37.
Knowledge brokerage context factors: what matters in knowledge exchange in impact assessment?
Environmental Science & Policy
51
325
37
SHEATE, W. R., DAGG, S., RICHARDSON, J., ASCHEMANN, R., PALERM, J. and STEEN, U. (2003), ‘Integrating the environment into strategic decision-making: conceptualizing policy SEA’, European Environment, 13, 1–18.
Integrating the environment into strategic decision-making: conceptualizing policy SEA
European Environment
13
1
18
SHEATE, W. R. and PARTIDÁRIO, M. R. (2010), ‘Strategic approaches and assessment techniques: potential for knowledge brokerage towards sustainability’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30, 278–88.
Strategic approaches and assessment techniques: potential for knowledge brokerage towards sustainability
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
30
278
88
SEWELL, W. H. (1992), ‘A theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformation’, American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1–29.
A theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformation
American Journal of Sociology
98
1
29
VERHEEM, R. and TONK, J. (2000), ‘SEA: one concept, multiple forms’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18, 177–82.
SEA: one concept, multiple forms
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
18
177
82
VERMA, N. (1996), ‘Pragmatic rationality and planning theory’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16, 5–14.
Pragmatic rationality and planning theory
Journal of Planning Education and Research
16
5
14
VICENTE, G. and PARTIDÁRIO, M. R. (2006), ‘SEA: enhancing communication for better environmental decisions’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26, 696–706.
SEA: enhancing communication for better environmental decisions
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
26
696
706
WESTON, J. (2004), ‘EIA in a risk society’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47, 313–25.
EIA in a risk society
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
47
313
25
WILKINS, H. (2003), ‘The need for subjectivity in EIA: discourse as a tool for sustainable development’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 401–14.
The need for subjectivity in EIA: discourse as a tool for sustainable development
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
23
401
14
WORLD COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT (1987), Our Common Future, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
YIN, R. (2009), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, London, Sage.
Case Study Research: Design and Methods