Frankenstein’s offspring: practicing science and parenthood in Natali’s Splice

Schmeink, Lars

doi:https://doi.org/10.3828/sfftv.2015.23

Schmeink, Lars

Science Fiction Film & Television (2015), 8, (3), 343–369.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/sfftv.2015.23
Language: English
Pages: 27

Abstract

This essay reflects on the mythopoetic rewriting of the Frankenstein myth in Vincenzo Natali’s film Splice (2009). In adapting the story to a twenty-first century context, the film shifts the original story of science gone wrong into the contemporary form of biohorror, of science gone right but with unforeseen and transgressive results. The film thus concentrates on the discussion of the moral dimension and societal consequences of creating a human– animal hybrid by means of a central allegory of science as parenthood. The post-human creation becomes the basis for discussions of scientific accountability and responsibility, the illusions of control over scientific progress and the ethical considerations involved in contemporary technoscience, especially genetic engineering. Moreover, scientific involvement with consumer capitalism is revealed to complicate the already shifting ethical bases of science, as the biopolitical understanding of life as commodity exerts dominance.

FormatArticle

£25.00

READ THIS ARTICLE

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Allen, Glen Scott. Master Mechanics & Wicked Wizards: Images of the American Scientist as Hero and Villain from Colonial Times to the Present. Amherst: U of Massachusetts P, 2009. Master Mechanics & Wicked Wizards: Images of the American Scientist as Hero and Villain from Colonial Times to the Present Google Scholar

Attebery, Brian. ‘Science Fiction and the Gender of Knowledge’. Speaking Science Fiction. Ed. Andy Sawyer and David Seed. Liverpool: Liverpool UP, 2000. 131–43. Science Fiction and the Gender of Knowledge Speaking Science Fiction 131 43 Google Scholar

Baldick, Chris. In Frankenstein’s Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity, and Nineteenth–Century Writing. Oxford: Clarendon, 1987. In Frankenstein’s Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity, and Nineteenth–Century Writing Google Scholar

Bauman, Zygmunt. Liquid Modernity. London: Polity, 2000. Liquid Modernity Google Scholar

Braidotti, Rosi. The Posthuman. London: Polity, 2013. The Posthuman Google Scholar

Captain. ‘Splice, Neuromancer and High Rise: The Twisted Future of Vincenzo Natali’. SFTV.com (18 Aug 2010). http://www.sftv.com.au/news/2010/08/splice-neuromancerand-high-rise-the-twisted-future-of-vincenzo-natali/. Accessed 12 Dec 2013. Google Scholar

Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. ‘Monster Culture (Seven Theses)’. Monster Theory: Reading Culture. Ed. Jeffrey Jerome Cohen. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1996. 3–25. Monster Culture (Seven Theses) Monster Theory: Reading Culture 3 25 Google Scholar

Dear, Nick. Frankenstein. Dir. Danny Boyle. Writ. Nick Dear. Perf. Jonny Lee Miller, Benedict Cumberbatch. Opening: 5 Feb 2011. Frankenstein Google Scholar

Dinello, Daniel. Technophobia: Science Fiction Visions of Posthuman Technology. Austin: U of Texas P, 2005. Technophobia: Science Fiction Visions of Posthuman Technology Google Scholar

Dougherty, Carol. Prometheus. London: Routledge, 2006. Prometheus Google Scholar

Feineman, Neil. Geek Chic: The Ultimate Guide to Geek Culture. Amsterdam: BIS, 2005. Geek Chic: The Ultimate Guide to Geek Culture Google Scholar

Haynes, Roslynn D. From Faust to Strangelove: Representations of the Scientist in Western Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1994. From Faust to Strangelove: Representations of the Scientist in Western Literature Google Scholar

Herbrechter, Stefan. Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis. London: Bloomsbury, 2013. Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis Google Scholar

Hustis, Harriet. ‘Responsible Creativity and the “Modernity” of Mary Shelley’s Prometheus’. Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 43.4 (2003): 845–58. Responsible Creativity and the “Modernity” of Mary Shelley’s Prometheus Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 43.4 845 58 Google Scholar

Inness, Sherrie A. ‘Introduction: Who Remembers Sabrina? Intelligence, Gender, and the Media’. Geek Chic: Smart Women in Popular Culture. Ed. Sherrie A. Inness. New York: Palgrave, 2007. 1–10. Introduction: Who Remembers Sabrina? Intelligence, Gender, and the Media Geek Chic: Smart Women in Popular Culture 1 10 Google Scholar

Ku, Chung-Hao. ‘Of Monster and Man: Transgenics and Transgression in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake’. Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies 32.1 (2006): 107–33. Of Monster and Man: Transgenics and Transgression in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies 32.1 107 33 Google Scholar

Natali, Vincenzo. ‘Behind the Scenes’. Splice. BluRay. Universum Film, 2010. Behind the Scenes Splice Google Scholar

Natali, Vincenzo, Antoinette Terry and Doug Taylor. ‘Splice’. Screenplay. Toronto: Copperheart Entertainment, 2007. http://www.joblo.com/scripts/splice.pdf. Accessed 14 Jul 2014. Google Scholar

Romney, Jonathan. ‘Splice, Vincenzo Natali, 104 Mins (15)’. The Independent. (25 Jul 2010). http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/reviews/splice-vincenzonatali-104-mins-15-2034657.html. Accessed 10 Aug 2010. Google Scholar

Schmeink, Lars. ‘Biopunk Dystopias: Genetic Engineering, Society and Science Fiction’. Dissertation. Humboldt University Berlin, Institute for British and American Studies. Berlin, 2014. Biopunk Dystopias: Genetic Engineering, Society and Science Fiction Google Scholar

Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus. 1818. London: Penguin, 1994. Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus Google Scholar

Small, Christopher. Ariel Like a Harpy: Shelley, Mary and Frankenstein. London: Gollancz, 1972. Ariel Like a Harpy: Shelley, Mary and Frankenstein Google Scholar

‘“Splice”, the Twisted Family Sci-Fi Horror Film Made of Awesome’. Blastr.com. (4 Jun 2010). http://www.blastr.com/2010/06/splice_makes_all_other_sci_fihorror_mash_ups_look_lame.php. Accessed 14 Jul 2014. Google Scholar

Thacker, Eugene. ‘Biohorror/Biotech’. Paradoxa 7.17 (2002): 109–29. Biohorror/Biotech Paradoxa 7.17 109 29 Google Scholar

Wolfe, Cary. What Is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2010. What Is Posthumanism? Google Scholar