Town Planning Review

‘If independence goes, the planning system goes’: New Political Governance and the English Planning Inspectorate

Town Planning Review (2020), 91, (1), 21–45.

Abstract

Radical restructuring of ‘arms-length’ government bodies following the 2010 UK national election signalled a change in relations between government and the civil service. This was seen as a major shift in modes of governance – from ‘New Public Management’ to a more politicised mode of ‘New Political Governance’. This paper presents an analysis of the impacts of these shifts on the English Planning Inspectorate, an executive agency central to the land-use planning system. It identifies measures by ministers to increase control over the inspectorate that represent a shift in governance culture and a shift in the planning system itself.

Access Token
£25.00
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

References

AUCOIN, P. (2012), ‘New political governance in Westminster systems: impartial public administration and management performance at risk’, Governance, 25, 177–99. Google Scholar

BARKER, A. and COUPER, M. (1984), ‘The art of quasi-judicial administration’, Urban Law and Policy, 6, 363–476. Google Scholar

BODDY, M. and HICKMAN, H. (2018), ‘“Between a rock and a hard place”: planning reform, localism and the role of the planning inspectorate in England’, Planning Theory and Practice, 19, 198–217. Google Scholar

BOSTON, J. and HALLIGAN, J. (2012), ‘Political management and new political governance: reconciling political responsiveness and neutral competence’, in H. Bakvis and M. D. Jarvis (eds), From New Public Management to New Political Governance, Montreal and Kingston, McGill-Queens University Press, 204–41. Google Scholar

CABINET OFFICE (2012), Public Bodies 2012, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/237347/Public_Bodies_2012.pdf (accessed 4 June 2018). Google Scholar

CABINET OFFICE (2018), The Approvals Process for the Creation of New Arm’s-Length Bodies: Guidance for Departments, http://www.publicchairsforum.org.uk/images/uploads/The_Approvals_Process_for_the_Creation_of_New_Arms_Length_Bodies.pdf (accessed 5 June 2018). Google Scholar

CAMERON, D. (2009), ‘People power: reforming quangos’, https://conservative-speeches.sayit.mysociety.org/speech/601336 (accessed 21 June 2018). Google Scholar

CARPENTER, J. (2017), Interview with Planning Inspectorate chief executive Sarah Richards, https://www.planningresource.co.uk/article/1431012/interview-planning-inspectorate-chief-executive-sarah-richards (accessed 6 June 2018). Google Scholar

CHRISTENSEN, T. (2012), ‘Post-NPM and changing public governance’, Meiji Journal of Political Science and Economics, http://mjpse.meiji.jp/articles/files/01-01/01-01.pdf (accessed 5 June 2018). Google Scholar

CHRISTENSEN, T. and LæGREID, P. (2007), ‘The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform’, Public Administration Review, 67, 1059–66. Google Scholar

DCLG (DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2011), A Plain English Guide to the Localism Act, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/5959/1896534.pdf (accessed 6 June 2018). Google Scholar

DCLG (DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2012), National Planning Policy Framework, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-planning-policy-framework--2 (accessed 6 June 2018). Google Scholar

DCLG (DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2014a), Letter from Nick Boles to Sir Michael Pitt on inspectors’ reports on local plans, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/286882/140303_Letter_-_Sir_Michael_Pitt.pdf (accessed 14 May 2015). Google Scholar

DCLG (DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2014b), Letter from Brandon Lewis to Simon Ridley on strategic housing market assessments, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/390029/141219_Simon_Ridley_-_FINAL_SIGNED.pdf (accessed 12 May 2017). Google Scholar

DCLG (DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2015a), Letter from Greg Clark to Simon Ridley on local plans, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/447372/SofS_letter_to_PINS_-_local_plans_TB.pdf (accessed 8 November 2017). Google Scholar

DCLG (DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2015b), Written statement by Greg Clark on planning for onshore oil and gas, https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-statement/Commons/2015-09-16/HCWS201/ (accessed 10 July 2017). Google Scholar

DCLG (DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2015c), Written statement by Brandon Lewis on local plans, https://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-vote-office/July%202015/21%20July/8-Communities-and-Local-Government-Local-Plans.pdf (accessed 19 June 2018). Google Scholar

DEXTER, L. A. (2006), Elite and Specialized Interviewing, Colchester, European Consortium for Political Research. Google Scholar

DOERN, G. and KERNAGHAN, K. (2012), ‘Conclusion. New political governance and new public management: reflections on the Aucoin legacy’, in Bakvis and Jarvis (eds), 380–90. Google Scholar

DOMMETT, K. and FLINDERS, M. (2015), ‘The centre strikes back: meta-governance, delegation, and the core executive in the United Kingdom, 2010–14’, Public Administration, 93, 1–16. Google Scholar

DONNELLY, M. (2018), ‘PINS could face “real problem” in recruiting inspectors, says chief executive’, https://www.planningresource.co.uk/article/1461681/pins-face-real-problem-recruiting-inspectors-says-chief-executive (accessed 13 June 2018). Google Scholar

DUNLEAVY, P. and HOOD, C. (1994), ‘From old public administration to new public management’, Public Money & Management, 14, 9–16. Google Scholar

EDGAR, L. (2017), Report: 43% of Councils Yet to Publish Draft Local Plan, https://www.theplanner.co.uk/news/report-43-of-councils-yet-to-publish-draft-local-plan (accessed 19 June 2018). Google Scholar

ELSTON, T. (2013), ‘Developments in UK executive agencies: re-examining the “disaggregation–reaggregation” thesis’, Public Policy & Administration, 28, 66–89. Google Scholar

ELSTON, T. (2014), ‘Not so “arm’s-length”: reinterpreting agencies in UK central government’, Public Administration, 92, 458–76. Google Scholar

ELSTON, T. (2017), ‘Conflict between explicit and tacit public service bargains in UK executive agencies’, Governance, 30, 85–104. Google Scholar

ENNSER-JEDENASTIK, L. (2016), ‘The politicization of regulatory agencies: between partisan influence and formal independence’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26, 507–18. Google Scholar

FLINDERS, M. and SKELCHER, C. (2012), ‘Shrinking the quango state: five challenges in reforming quangos’, Public Money and Management, 32, 327–34. Google Scholar

FLINDERS, M. and TONKISS, K. (2016), ‘From “poor parenting” to micro-management: coalition governance and the sponsorship of arm’s-length bodies in the United Kingdom, 2010–13’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82, 490–515. Google Scholar

GARTON GRIMWOOD, G. and BARTON, C. (2019), Calling-in Planning Applications (England), House of Commons Library Briefing Paper Number 00930. Google Scholar

GRANT, M. (2000a), Environmental Court Project: Final Report, report to the Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions. Google Scholar

GRANT, M. (2000b), Memorandum to the Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199900/cmselect/cmenvtra/364/364m37.htm (accessed 6 June 2018). Google Scholar

GREGORY, R. (2015), ‘Political independence, operational impartiality, and the effectiveness of anti-corruption agencies’, Asian Education and Development Studies, 4, 125–42. Google Scholar

GRUBE, D. (2015), ‘Responsibility to be enthusiastic? Public servants and the public face of “promiscuous partisanship”’, Governance, 28, 305–20. Google Scholar

HANSARD (2010), House of Commons debate, Thursday 14 October 2010, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmhansrd/cm101014/debtext/101014-0001.htm (accessed 8 November 2017). Google Scholar

HANSARD (2012), Written ministerial statements, 26 October, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmhansrd/cm121026/wmstext/121026m0001.htm#12102628000003 (accessed 8 November 2017). Google Scholar

HANSARD (2013), House of Commons debate, 17 July 2013, https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-07-17/debates/13071756000001/LocalismInPlanning (accessed 18 June 2018). Google Scholar

HANSARD (2014), Westminster Hall debate, 3 September 2014, https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-09-03/debates/14090343000003/RenewableEnergyDevelopment (Beccles) (accessed 19 June 2018). Google Scholar

HARVEY, W. (2011), ‘Strategies for conducting elite interviews’, Qualitative Research, 11, 431–41. Google Scholar

HOOD, C. (1991), ‘A public management for all seasons?’, Public Administration, 69, 3–19. Google Scholar

HOOD, C. and DIXON, R. (2015), A Government That Worked Better and Cost Less? Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

HOUSE OF COMMONS COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE (2011), Abolition of Regional Spatial Strategies: A Planning Vacuum, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmcomloc/517/517.pdf (accessed 3 May 2016). Google Scholar

HOUSE OF LORDS (2001), R (Alconbury Developments Ltd) v. SS for Environment, Transport and the Regions [2001] UKHL 23. Google Scholar

INSTITUTE FOR GOVERNMENT (2012), It Takes Two: How to Create Effective Relationships between Government and Arm’s-Length Bodies, https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publications/it-takes-two (accessed 6 June 2018). Google Scholar

JAMES, O., MOSELEY, A., PETROVSKY, N. and BOYNE, G. (2012), ‘Agencification in the UK’, in K. Verhoest, S. van Thiel, G. Bouckaert and P. Lægreid (eds), Government Agencies in Europe and Beyond: Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 57–68. Google Scholar

JAMES, O. and VAN THIEL, S. (2013), ‘Structural devolution to agencies’, in T. Christensen and P. Lægreid, The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, Farnham, Ashgate, 209–22. Google Scholar

JARVIS, M. D. and BAKVIS, H. (2012), ‘Introduction. Peter C. Aucoin: from new public management to new political governance’, in Bakvis and Jarvis (eds), 3–28. Google Scholar

JENKINS, K. and GOLD, J. (2011), ‘Unfinished business: where next for executive agencies?’, https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/Unfinished%20Business.pdf (accessed 28 November 2017). Google Scholar

JOHNSTON, B. (2017), ‘How Sajid Javid has ignored inspectors’ advice in Tory seats’, https://www.planningresource.co.uk/article/1447298/sajid-javid-ignored-inspectors-advice-tory-seats (accessed 18 September 2019). Google Scholar

KOOP, C. and HANRETTY, C. (2018), ‘Political independence, accountability, and the quality of regulatory decision-making’, Comparative Political Studies, 51, 38–75. Google Scholar

LAFFIN, M. (2016), ‘Planning in England: new public management, network governance or post-democracy?’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82, 354–72. Google Scholar

LEES, E. and SHEPHERD, E. (2015), ‘Incoherence and incompatibility in planning law’, International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 7, 111–26. Google Scholar

MUALAM, N. (2014), ‘Where planning meets the law’, Journal of Planning Literature, 29, 370–85. Google Scholar

OECD (2010), Value for Money in Government: Public Administration after ‘New Public Management’, https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=FD_WAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA114&dq=Value+for+Money+in+Government+Public+Administration+after+%22New+Public+Management%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjp9vbuw77bAhXLVsAKHWXIB44Q6AEIKTAA#v=onepage&q=Value%20for%20Money%20in%20Government%20Public%20Administration%20after%20%22New%20Public%20Management%22&f=false (accessed 6 June 2018). Google Scholar

OSBORNE, S. (2010), The New Public Governance: Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance, Abingdon, Routledge. Google Scholar

PETERS, G. (2008), ‘The civil service and governing: reclaiming the center’, International Review of Public Administration, 13, 1–12. Google Scholar

PITT, M. (2013), ‘Wind turbine appeal decisions by inspector Paul Griffiths’, letter to Julian Smith MP, https://protect-devon.org.uk/public-files/PINS-sir-michael-pitt-re-griffiths.pdf (accessed 18 December 2019). Google Scholar

PLANNING INSPECTORATE (2016), The Planning Inspectorate Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/539025/PINS_ARA_final_version_ISBN9781474128964_WEB.pdf (accessed 19 June 2018). Google Scholar

PLANNING INSPECTORATE (2018), The Planning Inspectorate Annual Report and Accounts 2017/2018, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/724350/annual_report_2017-2018HC_1264_web_eng.pdf (accessed 18 June 2018). Google Scholar

PLANNING INSPECTORATE, WELSH GOVERNMENT AND DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (2012), The Planning Inspectorate Framework Document, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-planning-inspectorate-framework-document (accessed 18 June 2018). Google Scholar

POLLITT, C. and BOUCKAERT, G. (2011), Continuity and Change in Public Policy and Management, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar

RICHARDS, S. (2018), Letter: ‘Planning Inspectorate will tackle its challenges’, https://www.planningresource.co.uk/article/1462006/letter-planning-inspectorate-will-tackle-its-challenges (accessed 13 June 2018). Google Scholar

ROSEWELL, B. (2018), Independent Review of Planning Appeal Inquiries Report, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/777823/Independent_Review_of_Planning_Appeal_Inquiries_Main_Report.pdf (accessed 6 November 2019). Google Scholar

RUTTER, J. (2014), ‘The quango conundrum revisited: why the government still needs a more coherent approach to arm’s-length bodies’, Political Quarterly, 85, 148–52. Google Scholar

SAGER, T. AND SøRENSEN, H. (2011), ‘Planning analysis and political steering with new public management’, European Planning Studies, 19, 217–41. Google Scholar

SLADE, D. (2018), The Making of the National Planning Policy Framework: An Investigation into the Practices and (Post)politics of Doing Promarket Planning Reform in the UK Central State, https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3017471/1/200598021_JAN2018.pdf (accessed 5 September 2019). Google Scholar

SMITH, L. (2017), House of Commons Briefing Paper on Calling in Planning Applications, SN00930. Google Scholar

SUPREME COURT (2017), Judgement, Suffolk Coastal District Council (Appellant) v. Hopkins Homes Ltd and Another (Respondents), Richborough Estates Partnership LLP and Another (Respondents) v. Cheshire East Borough Council (Appellant), UKSC 37. Google Scholar

THIRTY NINE ESSEX STREET (2015), Environmental & Planning Law Update: Top 10 Planning and Environmental Cases of 2014–2015, http://www.39essex.com/content/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/39-Essex-Street-Manchester-Seminar-Top-10-EP-Cases.pdf (accessed 19 June 2018). Google Scholar

TRAVERS, D., BYRD, N. and ATKINSON, G. (2013), Planning Law and Practice, London, Wildy, Simmonds & Hill. Google Scholar

VERHOEST, K. (2018), ‘Agencification in Europe’, in E. Ongaro and S. van Thiel (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 327–46. Google Scholar

VICKERY, D. (2016), ‘End game for local plans?’, Town and Country Planning, November, 539–42. Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Hickman, Hannah

Boddy, Martin