Labour History Review

Enclosure, waged labour and the formation of class consciousness: rural Middlesex c. 1700-1835

Labour History Review (2001), 66, (3), 269–293.

Abstract

Access Token
£25.00
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

 Google Scholar

K. Marx, Capital, Vol. I, London, Lawrence & Wishart, 1954, p. 688 Capital I 688 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

M. Overton, Agricultural Revolution in England: The Transformation of the Agrarian Economy, 1500-1850, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996, p. 191 Agricultural Revolution in England: The Transformation of the Agrarian Economy, 1500-1850 191 Google Scholar

R. Wells, ‘The development of the English proletariat and social protest, 1700-1850’, in M. Reed and R. Wells (eds), Class, Conflict and Protest in the English Countryside, 1700-1880, London, Frank Cass, 1990, pp. 32-3 Class, Conflict and Protest in the English Countryside, 1700-1880 32 3 Google Scholar

J. E. Archer, ‘The Wells-Charlesworth debate: A personal comment on arson in Norfolk and Suffolk’, in Reed and Wells (eds), Class, Conflict and Protest, p. 82 Google Scholar

M. Reed and R. Wells, ‘An agenda for modern English rural history?’, in Reed and Wells (eds), Class, Conflict and Protest, p. 219; J. M. Neeson, ‘The opponents of enclosure in eighteenth-century Northamptonshire’, Past and Present, 105, 1984, pp. 114-39 Google Scholar

M. Turner, ‘Economic protest in rural society: opposition to parliamentary enclosure in Buckinghamshire’, Southern History, 10, 1988, p. 95 ‘Economic protest in rural society: opposition to parliamentary enclosure in Buckinghamshire’ Southern History 10 95 Google Scholar

R. Wells, ‘The moral economy of the English countryside’, in A. Randall and A. Charlesworth (eds), Moral Economy and Popular Protest: Crowds, Conflict and Authority, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 2000, pp. 223-7 Moral Economy and Popular Protest: Crowds, Conflict and Authority 223 7 Google Scholar

W. A. Armstrong, ‘Rural population growth, systems of employment and incomes’, in G. E. Mingay (ed.), The Agrarian History of England and Wales: Vol. VI, 1750-1850, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989, p. 711. Armstrong suggests that ‘although the available statistics point to the likelihood that some sections of the [rural] labour force secured some real gains, it is difficult to represent the sub-period [1815-35] as one of a broad-based and general advance in the labourers welfare’ (my italics). P. H. Lindert, ‘Unequal living standards’, in R. Floud and D. McCloskey (eds), The Economic History of Britain Since 1700, Vol. I, 2nd edn, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 370-1 and 385. Lindert claims that in terms of real wages ‘even farm workers shared in the net gains, both for the whole century [1750-1850] and for the post war era 1815-50’ The Agrarian History of England and Wales: Vol. VI, 1750-1850 711 Google Scholar

J. L. and B. Hammond, The Village Labourer, 1760-1832: A Study in the Government of England Before the Reform Bill, London, Longmans, 1911. All references in this article are taken from the fourth edition published in 1927. A characteristically robust defence is offered in E. P. Thompson, Customs in Common, London, Merlin Press, 1991, p. 115; and more generally in J. M. Neeson, Commoners: Common Right, Enclosure and Social Change in England, 1700-1820, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993 The Village Labourer, 1760-1832: A Study in the Government of England Before the Reform Bill Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

W. G. Hoskins and L. D. Stamp, The Common Lands of England and Wales, London, Collins, 1963, pp. 92-3 The Common Lands of England and Wales 92 3 Google Scholar

Parliamentary Papers (PP), Comparative Account of the Population of Great Britain in the Years, 1801, 1811, 1821 and 1831, Shannon, Ireland, 1968 reprint, pp. 161-5 Google Scholar

R. Finlay and B. Shearer, ‘Population growth and suburban expansion’, in A. L. Beier and R. Finlay (eds), London, 1500-1700: The Making of the Metropolis, London, Longman, 1986, p. 42 London, 1500-1700: The Making of the Metropolis 42 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

PP, Abstract of Answers and Returns Under the Population Act, 1831, pp. 364-77 Google Scholar

R. C. Richardson ‘Metropolitan counties: Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire, and Middlesex’, in J. Thirsk (ed.), The Agrarian History of England and Wales 1640-1750, Regional Farming Systems, Vol. VI, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1984, p. 245 The Agrarian History of England and Wales 1640-1750, Regional Farming Systems VI 245 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

L. G. Bennett, The Horticultural History of Middlesex, Reading, Reading University Department of Agricultural Economics, 1952, pp. 9-14 The Horticultural History of Middlesex 9 14 Google Scholar

F. M. L. Thompson, Hampstead: Building a Borough, 1650-1965, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974, pp. 9-10 Hampstead: Building a Borough, 1650-1965 9 10 Google Scholar

F. Bickley (ed.), Historical Manuscripts Commission: Report on the Manuscripts of the Late Reginald Hastings Esq., of the Manor House, Ashby de la Zouch, Vol. III, London, HMSO, 1934, p. 47 Google Scholar

T. Baird, General View of the Agriculture of the County of Middlesex, London, 1793, p. 22 General View of the Agriculture of the County of Middlesex 22 Google Scholar

P. Foot, General View of the Agriculture of the County of Middlesex, London, 1794, p. 31 General View of the Agriculture of the County of Middlesex 31 Google Scholar

J. Middleton, View of the Agriculture of the County of Middlesex, London, 1798, p. 103. Also ibid., 2nd edn, 1807, p. 117 View of the Agriculture of the County of Middlesex 103 Google Scholar

D. Pam, History of Enfield: Volume One - Before 1837, A Parish Near London, Enfield, Enfield Preservation Society, 1990, pp. 117-18 History of Enfield: Volume One - Before 1837, A Parish Near London 117 18 Google Scholar

Finlay and Shearer, ‘Population growth’, p. 39. R. Schofield, ‘British population change, 1700-1871’, in Floud and McCloskey (eds), Economic History, p. 88 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

J. Lucas (ed.), Peter Kalms's Account of His Visit to England on His Way to America in 1748, London, Macmillan, 1892, pp. 82-3 Peter Kalms's Account of His Visit to England on His Way to America in 1748 82 3 Google Scholar

Middleton, Middlesex, 1798, p. 256. EM. Eden, The State of the Poor, London, B. & J. White, 1797, p. 419 Google Scholar

S. J. Madge, ‘Rural Middlesex under the Commonwealth’, Transactions of the London & Middlesex Archaeological Society (TL&MAS), 4, 1922, p. 292. Trustees for the Sale of Crown Lands, Parliamentary Surveys, Enfield Chase, Public Record Office (PRO), Kew, E 317/Middx/17, 1650 ‘Rural Middlesex under the Commonwealth’ Transactions of the London & Middlesex Archaeological Society (TL&MAS) 4 292 Google Scholar

The humble Petition of the … Proprietors, and Commoners … of Enfield, Edmonton, Southmines [South Mimms], and Hadley, London, 1659 Google Scholar

Middleton, Middlesex, 1798, p. 98 and 1807, p. 114. An Act for the Partition of Hounslow Heath, Hen. VIII. 37. c.2. The act estimates the extent of the heath as a conservative 4,293 acres in 1545 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

W. E. Tate (ed. M. E. Turner), A Domesday of English Enclosure Acts and Awards, Reading, Reading University Press, 1978, pp. 173-4 A Domesday of English Enclosure Acts and Awards 173 4 Google Scholar

This calculation based on figures taken from the Middlesex awards in Tate, Domesday, pp. 173-5, added to the remaining acreage set out for Middlesex commons (and ex-Middlesex commons) in Hoskins and Stamp, Common Lands, pp. 140-1 and pp. 298-9 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

At times of high unemployment however this could lead to an increase of the poor rates. See Middleton, Middlesex, 1798, p. 103. Here Middleton, writing in a period of high unemployment, objects to the practice of the poor squatting on or near commons Google Scholar

Overton, Agricultural Revolution, pp. 162-3 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

Memorial of John Hale, Clerk of Enfield Manor Court to George II quoted in E. P. Thompson, Whigs and Hunters: The Origins of the Black Act, London, Allen Lane, 1975, p. 169 Whigs and Hunters: The Origins of the Black Act 169 Google Scholar

Bickley, Hastings, p. 47 Google Scholar

Baird, Middlesex, p. 22 Google Scholar

Middleton, Middlesex, 1798, p. 103 Google Scholar

W. Covil, A Declaration on the Behalf of the Poor of Enfield, 1660, p. 7 Google Scholar

Baird, Middlesex, p. 26 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

House of Commons Journal, XXXI, 1767, pp. 166-7 and p. 187. Hammond, Village Labourer, refers to these petitions at pp. 320-1. Annual Register, London, J. Dodsley, 1767, p. 68 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

Hanwell VMB 1807-28, ELHL, Acc 13/9, 19 May 1813. For an identical case on Uxbridge Moor in 1812 see D. M. Griffiths, A History of Uxbridge Cricket Club 1735-1971, West Drayton, 1971, p. 14 Google Scholar

It appears a number of these trays were produced. See D. R. and C. D. Sherborn, The Sherborns of Bedfont, 1338-1966, Hounslow Library, typescript, n.d. c.1966, p. 21 Google Scholar

Report from the Select Committee [on] Bills of Inclosure, PP, 1800, p. 235. See footnote 46 for Ruislip Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

This appears to have been common in the eighteenth century but falling out of favour c.1800. However at Islington it continued well into the nineteenth century. Middleton, Middlesex, 1807, p. 287. J. Nelson, The History, Topography, and Antiquities of the Parish of Islington, London, John Nichols & Son, 1811, p. 107 Google Scholar

C. R. Dobson, Masters and Journeymen: A Prehistory of Industrial Relations 1717-1800, London, Croom Helm, 1980, p. 23, pp. 159-62 Masters and Journeymen: A Prehistory of Industrial Relations 1717-1800 23 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

Agricultural State of the Kingdom, 1816, reprint, New York, A. M. Kelley, 1970, pp. 167-9 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

W. S. Tootell, A Brief Sketch of the Town of Edgware, BA&LSC, MS, 1817, p. 37 A Brief Sketch of the Town of Edgware 37 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

Tootell, Edgware, p. 37 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

House of Commons Journal, LXXV, 1820, p. 201; LXXVI, 1821, p. 143 Google Scholar

Report from the Select Committee on Agriculture, PP, 1833, II, p. 545 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

Letter to Sir R. H. Inglis in S. Raffles, Memoir of the Life and Public Services of Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles, By His Widow, vol. II, 2nd edn, London, J. Duncan, 1835, p. 364 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

The Times, 18 June 1830. The italics are in the original Google Scholar

The Times, 22 June 1830 Google Scholar

E. Bowlt, The Goodliest Place in Middlesex, Uxbridge, Hillingdon Borough Libraries, 1989, p. 185, p. 188 The Goodliest Place in Middlesex 185 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

C. Morsley, News From the English Countryside 1750-1850, London, George G. Harrap, 1979, pp. 245-6 News From the English Countryside 1750-1850 245 6 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

Morsley, English Countryside, p. 246 Google Scholar

Poor Laws, PP, 1834, XIV, 299e Google Scholar

E. J. Hobsbawm and G. Rude', Captain Swing, London, Lawrence & Wishart, 1969, Appendix III, pp. 312-58 Captain Swing 312 58 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

M. Pope, Middlesex in Prose and Verse, London, Elkin Mathews & Marriot, 1930, p. 64 Middlesex in Prose and Verse 64 Google Scholar

The Times, 4 December 1830 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

J. D. Chambers and G. E. Mingay, The Agricultural Revolution 1750-1880, London, Batsford, 1966, p. 104 The Agricultural Revolution 1750-1880 104 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

Return of the Spelthorne Division JPs to the to the Constabulary Force Commission, 1836 quoted in D. Philips and R. D. Storch, Policing Provincial England, 1829-1856, London, Leicester University Press, 1999, p. 44 Policing Provincial England, 1829-1856 44 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

Poor Laws, PP, 1834, XVI, 101h Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

H. Tremenheere, ‘Agricultural and Educational Statistics of Several Parishes in the County of Middlesex’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 6, 1843, p. 122 ‘Agricultural and Educational Statistics of Several Parishes in the County of Middlesex’ Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 6 122 Google Scholar

Poor Laws, PP, 1834, XV, 100f Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

J. C. Clutterbuck, ‘The Farming of Middlesex’, Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England, 2, 5, 1869, p. 10 ‘The Farming of Middlesex’ Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England 2 10 Google Scholar

G. E. Mingay, Parliamentary Enclosure in England: An Introduction to its Causes, Incidence and Impact, 1750-1850, London, Longman, 1997, p. 156 Parliamentary Enclosure in England: An Introduction to its Causes, Incidence and Impact, 1750-1850 156 Google Scholar

There is still much work to do on the opposition to machinery in agriculture during c.1840-1870. See references to such opposition in E. J. T. Collins, ‘The rationality of "surplus" agricultural labour: mechanization in English agriculture in the nineteenth century’, Agricultural History Review, 35, 1, 1987, p. 39; A. Armstrong, Farmworkers: A Social and Economic History, 1770-1980, London, Batsford, 1988, p. 93; D. Jones, ‘Rural crime and protest in the Victorian era’, in G. Mingay (ed.), The Unquiet Countryside, London, Routledge, 1989, p. 119 ‘The rationality of "surplus" agricultural labour: mechanization in English agriculture in the nineteenth century’ Agricultural History Review 35 39 Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Carter, Paul