European Journal of Language Policy

Public opinion on useful languages in Europe

European Journal of Language Policy (2011), 3, (1), 1–14.

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/ejlp.2011.2
Language
English
Pages
14

Abstract

This article analyses the results of five Eurobarometer surveys (of 1995, 1997, 1998, 2000 and 2005) designed to measure which languages Europeans consider most useful to know. Most Europeans are of the opinion that English is the most useful, followed by French and German. During the last decade the popularity of French and German as useful languages has been decreasing significantly, while English has remained universally favoured as the most useful language. French and German have lost their popularity especially among those who do not speak them as a foreign language. On the other hand, Spanish, Russian and other languages (often these include languages of neighbouring countries, minority languages or a second official language of the country in question) have kept and even increased their former level of popularity. Opinions about useful languages vary according to a respondent's knowledge of languages, education and profession. This article analyses these differences and discusses their impact on the study of foreign languages and the future of the practice of foreign languages in Europe.

Le présent article analyse les résultats de cinq enquêtes Eurobaromètre (1995, 1997, 1998, 2000 et 2005) destinées à mesurer quelles sont les langues que les Européens considèrent les plus utiles à connaître. La plupart des Européens pensent que l'anglais est le plus utile, suivi par le français et l'allemand. Au cours de la dernière décennie, la popularité du français et de l'allemand en tant que langues utiles a diminué de façon significative, tandis que l'anglais reste apprécié de tous comme la langue la plus utile. Le français et l'allemand ont perdu de leur popularité, en particulier parmi les personnes qui ne les parlent pas comme langue étrangère. D'autre part, l'espagnol, le russe et d'autres langues (il s'agit souvent des langues des pays voisins, des langues minoritaires ou de la deuxième langue officielle du pays en question) ont maintenu ou même surpassé leur ancien niveau de popularité. L'opinion sur l'utilité des langues varie en fonction de la connaissance des langues du répondant, de son niveau d'éducation et de sa profession. Notre article analyse ces différences, et examine leur impact sur l'étude des langues étrangères et sur l'avenir de la pratique des langues étrangères en Europe.

Access Token

FormatArticle

£25.00
READ THIS ARTICLE
References
Full Text
PDF
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Ammon, U. (1991). 'The Status of German and other Languages in the European Community', in F. Coulmans (ed.), A Language Policy for the European Community. Prospects and Quandaries (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), pp. 241–54. The Status of German and other Languages in the European Community A Language Policy for the European Community. Prospects and Quandaries 241 54 Google Scholar

Cabau-Lampa, B. (2007). 'Mother Tongue Plus Two European Languages in Sweden: Unrealistic Educational Goal?', Language Policy 6.3–4: 333–58. Mother Tongue Plus Two European Languages in Sweden: Unrealistic Educational Goal? Language Policy 6 333 58 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

CoEC (Commission of the European Communities), (2005). 'A New Framework Strategy for Multilingualism'. Communication from the Commission to the Council, The European Parliament, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions, COM (2005) 596 final, 22 November (Brussels: CoEC), available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ Google Scholar

CoEC (2006). Europeans and their Languages, Special Eurobarometer 243, Wave 64.3, TNS Opinion & Social. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_243_en.pdf Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

Coleman, J. A. (2009) 'Why the British do not Learn Languages: Myths and Motivation in the United Kingdom', Language Learning Journal 37.1: 111–27. Why the British do not Learn Languages: Myths and Motivation in the United Kingdom Language Learning Journal 37 111 27 Google Scholar

Eurobarometer see CoEC Eurobarometer. Google Scholar

Gerhards, J. (2008). 'Transnationales linguistisches Kapital der Bürger und der Prozess der europäischen Integration', Berliner Studien zur Soziologie Europas 17. Transnationales linguistisches Kapital der Bürger und der Prozess der europäischen Integration Berliner Studien zur Soziologie Europas 1 7 Google Scholar

Ginsburgh, V., I. Ortuño-Ortín and S. Weber (2007). 'Learning Foreign Languages: Theoretical and Empirical Implications of the Selten and Pool Model', Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 64: 337–47. Learning Foreign Languages: Theoretical and Empirical Implications of the Selten and Pool Model Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 64 337 47 Google Scholar

Grin, F. (2003). 'Language Planning and Economics', Current Issues in Language Planning 4.1: 1–66. Language Planning and Economics Current Issues in Language Planning 4 1 66 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

Ikonomu, D. M. (2008). Mehrsprachigkeit und ihre Rahmenbedingungen. Fremdsprachenkompetenz in den EU-Ländern (Bern: Peter Lang). Mehrsprachigkeit und ihre Rahmenbedingungen. Fremdsprachenkompetenz in den EU-Ländern Google Scholar

Kelly, M. (2009). 'A Third Space for Europe. Intercultural Communication in European Language Policy', European Journal of Language Policy 1.1: 1–20. A Third Space for Europe. Intercultural Communication in European Language Policy European Journal of Language Policy 1 1 20 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

Labrie, N., and C. Quell (1997). 'Your Language, my Language or English? The Potential Language Choice in Communication among Nationals of the European Union', World Englishes 16.1: 3–26. Your Language, my Language or English? The Potential Language Choice in Communication among Nationals of the European Union World Englishes 16 3 26 Google Scholar

Laitin, D. (1988). 'Language Games', Comparative Politics 20.3: 289–302. Language Games Comparative Politics 20 289 302 Google Scholar

Laitin, D., (1993). 'The Game Theory of Language Regimes', International Political Science Review 14.3: 227–39. The Game Theory of Language Regimes International Political Science Review 14 227 39 Google Scholar

Macaro, E. (2008). 'The Decline in Language Learning in England: Getting the Facts Right and Getting Real', Language Learning Journal 36.1: 101–108. The Decline in Language Learning in England: Getting the Facts Right and Getting Real Language Learning Journal 36 101 108 Google Scholar

Phillipson, R. (2003). English-Only Europe? Challenging Language Policy (London and New York: Routledge). English-Only Europe? Challenging Language Policy Google Scholar

Phillipson, R., (2008). 'Lingua franca or lingua frankensteinia? English in European Integration and Globalisation', World Englishes 27.2: 250–67. Lingua franca or lingua frankensteinia? English in European Integration and Globalisation World Englishes 27 250 67 Google Scholar

Pietiläinen, J. (2007). 'Evoluo de lingvoscio en Eŭropa Unio. Al nur-Angla aŭ plurlingva Eŭropo', Language Problems and Language Planning 31.3: 257–79. Evoluo de lingvoscio en Eŭropa Unio. Al nur-Angla aŭ plurlingva Eŭropo Language Problems and Language Planning 31 257 79 Google Scholar

Quartremer, J. (2010). 'No taxation without translation'. Coulisses de Bruxelles, UE. 3 October 2010. Un blog de Libération.fr: http://bruxelles.blogs.liberation.fr/coulisses/2010/10/no-taxation-without-translation-.html Google Scholar

Reagan, T. (2004). '"Don't Know Much about the French I Took": A Contemporary Case for Second Language Study in the Liberal Arts', Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 3.2: 229–39. "Don't Know Much about the French I Took": A Contemporary Case for Second Language Study in the Liberal Arts Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 3 229 39 Google Scholar

Selten, R., and J. Pool (1991). 'The Distribution of Foreign Language Skills as a Game Equilibrium', in R. Selten (ed.), Game Equilibrium Models, Vol. 4 (Berlin: Springer), pp. 64–84. The Distribution of Foreign Language Skills as a Game Equilibrium Game Equilibrium Models 4 64 84 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

Swaan, A. de (1993). 'The Evolving European Language System: A Theory of Communication Potential and Language Competition', International Political Science Review 14.3: 241–55. The Evolving European Language System: A Theory of Communication Potential and Language Competition International Political Science Review 14 241 55 Google Scholar

Tender, T., and T. Vihalemm (2009). '"Two Languages in Addition to Mother Tongue" – Will This Policy Preserve Linguistic Diversity in Europe?', Trames 13.1: 41–63. "Two Languages in Addition to Mother Tongue" – Will This Policy Preserve Linguistic Diversity in Europe? Trames 13 41 63 Google Scholar

Truchot, C. (2002). Key Aspects of the Use of English in Europe (Strasbourg: Council of Europe). Key Aspects of the Use of English in Europe Google Scholar

Van Els, T. (2005). 'Multilingualism in the European Union', International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15.3: 263–81. Multilingualism in the European Union International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15 263 81 Google Scholar

van Parijs, P. (2004). 'Europe's Linguistic Challenge', Archives européennes de sociologie, 45.1: 113–54. Europe's Linguistic Challenge Archives européennes de sociologie 45 113 54 Google Scholar

Wright, S. (2009). 'The Elephant in the Room: Language Issues in the European Union', European Journal of Language Policy 1.2: 93–120. The Elephant in the Room: Language Issues in the European Union European Journal of Language Policy 1 93 120 Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Pietiläinen, Jukka