Abdullah, N. (2008) ‘A study into usability of tools for searching and browsing e-books with particular reference to back-of-thebook index.’ Dissertation, University of Malaya.
Professional women on their professions: indexing
Abdullah, N. and Gibb, F. (2007) ‘Students’ reactions towards e-books in an university library collection.’ International Journal of the Book 5(1), 63–72.
International Journal of the Book
5
63
72
Abdullah, N. and Gibb, F. (2008a) ‘Students’ attitudes towards e-books in a Scottish higher education institute: Part 1.’ Library Review 57(8), 593–605.
Library Review
57
593
605
Abdullah, N. and Gibb, F. (2008b) ‘Students’ attitudes towards e-books in a Scottish higher education institute: Part 2 – analysis of e-book usage.’ Library Review 57(9), 676–89.
Library Review
57
676
89
Abdullah, N. and Gibb, F. (2008c) ‘Using a task-based approach in evaluating the usability of BoBIs in an e-book environment’, pp. 246–57 in C. Macdonald et al. (eds), Advances in information retrieval: lecture notes in computer science. Springer. http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-540-78646-7/page/2
Abdullah, N. and Gibb, F. (2009) ‘Students’ attitudes towards e books in a Scottish higher education institute: Part 3 – search and browse tasks.’ Library Review 58(1), 17–27.
Students’ attitudes towards e books in a Scottish higher education institute: Part 3 – search and browse tasks
International Journal of the Book
5
63
72
Allen, B. L. (1991) ‘Cognitive research in information science’, pp. 3–37 in M. E. Williams (ed.), Annual review of information science and technology. Medford, N.J.: Learned Information.
Cognitive research in information science
Annual review of information science and technology
3
37
Anderson, J. D. (1993) ‘Indexing standards: Are they possible? What good are they? Why bother?’ Paper presented at Proceedings from the American Society of Indexers 25th Annual Meeting, Port Aransas, Tex.
Indexing standards: Are they possible? What good are they? Why bother?
Anderson, J. D. and Pérez-Carballo, J. (2005) Information retrieval and design. St Petersburg, Fla.: Ometeca Institute.
Information retrieval and design
Babu, R. R. (1992) ‘User preferences for indexes in philosophical books: a survey.’ Library Review 4(1), 47–55.
User preferences for indexes in philosophical books: a survey
Library Review
4
47
55
Bakewell, K. (1990) ‘Towards a new international standard on indexing’ . The Indexer 17(2), 127–8.
Towards a new international standard on indexing
The Indexer
17
127
8
Bakewell, K. G. B. (1993) ‘Research in indexing: More needed?’ The Indexer 18(3), 147–51.
Research in indexing: More needed?
The Indexer
18
147
51
Bakewell, K. et al. (2000) Indexing children’s books, ed. Michèle Clarke. Occasional Papers on Indexing No. 5. Sheffield, UK: Society of Indexers.
Indexing children’s books
Banwell, L. and Coulson, G. (2004) ‘Users and user study methodology: the JUBILEE project’, Information Research 9(2). www.informationr.net/ir/9-2/paper167.html
Barnum, C. M., Henderson, E., Hood, A. and Jordan, R. (2004) ‘Index versus full-text search: A usability study of user preference and performance.’ Technical Communication 51(2), 185–206.
Users and user study methodology: the JUBILEE project
Technical Communication
51
185
206
Bell, H. K. (1993) ‘Vive la différence! The survival of the softest.’ The Indexer 18(4), 231–6.
Vive la différence! The survival of the softest
The Indexer
18
231
6
Bell, H. K. (1996) ‘Whom should we aim to please?’ The Indexer 20(1), 3–5.
Whom should we aim to please?
The Indexer
20
3
5
Berg, S. A., Hoffmann, K. and Dawson, D. (2010) ‘Not on the same page: undergraduates’ information retrieval in electronic and print books.’ Journal of Academic Librarianship 36(6), 518–25.
Journal of Academic Librarianship
36
518
25
Bishop, A. P., Liddy, E. D. and Settel, B. (1991a) ‘Index quality study, part I: Quantitative description of back-of-book indexes’, pp. 15–51 in Indexing tradition and innovation. Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the American Society of Indexers. Wheat Ridge, Colo.: ASI.
Index quality study, part I: Quantitative description of back-of-book indexes
15
51
Bishop, A. P., Liddy, E. D. and Settel, B. (1991b) ‘Index quality study, part II: Publishers’ survey and qualitative assessment’, pp. 53–79 in Indexing tradition and innovation. Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the American Society of Indexers. Wheat Ridge, Colo.: ASI.
Indexing tradition and innovation. Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the American Society of Indexers
53
79
Bosschieter, P. (2006) ‘Back-of-the-book indexing in the Netherlands today.’ The Indexer 25(2), 86–8.
Back-of-the-book indexing in the Netherlands today
The Indexer
25
86
8
Browne, G. and Jermey, J. (2007) The indexing companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The indexing companion
Calvert, D. (1996) ‘Deconstructing indexing standards’. The Indexer 20(2), 74–7.
Deconstructing indexing standards
The Indexer
20
74
7
Case, D. O. (2012) Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior, 3rd edn. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior
Cevolini, A. (2014) ‘Indexing as preadaptive advance: a socioevolutionary perspective’. The Indexer 32(2), 50–7.
Indexing as preadaptive advance: a socioevolutionary perspective
The Indexer
32
50
7
Cleveland, D. B. and Cleveland, A. D. (1990) Introduction to indexing and abstracting. Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.
Introduction to indexing and abstracting
Cooper, H. (1998) Synthesizing research: a guide for literature reviews, 2nd edn. Sage.
Synthesizing research: a guide for literature reviews
Diodato, V. (1994) ‘User preferences for features in back of book indexes.’ Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45(7), 529–36.
User preferences for features in back of book indexes
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
45
529
36
Diodato, V. and Gandt, G. (1991) ‘Back of book indexes and the characteristics of author and nonauthor indexing: report of an exploratory study.’ Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42(5), 341–50.
Back of book indexes and the characteristics of author and nonauthor indexing: report of an exploratory study
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
42
341
50
Evans, R. T. (2002) ‘Usability test: Index vs. full-text search.’ Paper presented at Southern Polytechnic State University, Marietta, Ga., 10 January.
Usability test: Index vs. full-text search
Fidel, R. (2008) ‘Are we there yet? Mixed methods research in library and information science.’ Library and Information Science Research, 30, 265–72.
Are we there yet? Mixed methods research in library and information science
Library and Information Science Research
265
72
Flatoff, J. (2007) ‘Do children use indexes differently than adults? Summary of an informal survey of index users.’ Key Words 15(1), 19–30.
Do children use indexes differently than adults? Summary of an informal survey of index users
Key Words
15
19
30
Gratch, B., Settel, B. and Atherton, P. (1978) ‘Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences.’ The Indexer 11(2), 14–23.
Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences
The Indexer
11
14
23
Hanson, F. A. (2007) The trouble with culture: How computers are calming the culture wars. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press.
The trouble with culture: How computers are calming the culture wars
Harman, D. (2011) ‘Information retrieval evaluation’, in G. Marchionini (ed.), Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services. San Rafael, Calif.: Morgan & Claypool.
Information retrieval evaluation
Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services
Hert, C. A., Jacob, E. K. and Dawson, P. (2000) ‘A usability assessment of online indexing structures in the networked environment.’ Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51(1), 971–88.
A usability assessment of online indexing structures in the networked environment
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
51
971
88
Hjorland, B. (2011) ‘The importance of theories of knowledge: Indexing and information retrieval as an example.’ Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(1), 72–7.
The importance of theories of knowledge: Indexing and information retrieval as an example
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
62
72
7
Johncocks, B. (2008a) ‘Web 2.0 and users’ expectations of indexes.’ The Indexer 26(1), 18–24.
The Indexer
26
18
24
Johncocks, B. (2008b) ‘Indexing by numbers: Is there scope for metrics in index evaluation?’ The Indexer 26(4), 158–62.
Indexing by numbers: Is there scope for metrics in index evaluation?
The Indexer
26
158
62
Kingsley, I. (2008) ‘The usability of academic library website indexes: an investigation.’ The Indexer 26(2), 71–8.
The usability of academic library website indexes: an investigation
The Indexer
26
71
8
Kleinberg, I. (1993) ‘Making the case for professional indexers: Where is the proof?’ pp. 139–46 in Proceedings from the American Society of Indexers 25th Annual Meeting, Alexandria, Va., 20–22 May.
Making the case for professional indexers: Where is the proof?
Proceedings from the American Society of Indexers 25th Annual Meeting, Alexandria, Va., 20–22 May
139
46
Knight, G. N. (1979) Indexing, the art of. London: Allen & Unwin.
Indexing, the art of
Landes, C. (2009) ‘Testing usability: “Experience an index usability test” at the ASI Conference (Portland, 2009).’ The Indexer 27(4), 152–63.
Testing usability: “Experience an index usability test” at the ASI Conference (Portland, 2009)
The Indexer
27
152
63
Liddy, E. D. and Jörgensen, C. L. (1993) ‘Reality check! Book index characteristics that facilitate information access’, pp. 125–38 in Proceedings from the American Society of Indexers 25 th Annual Meeting, Alexandria, Va., 20–22 May.
Reality check! Book index characteristics that facilitate information access
Proceedings from the American Society of Indexers 25 th Annual Meeting, Alexandria, Va., 20–22 May
125
38
Liddy, E. D. and Jörgensen, C. L. (1996) ‘Information access or information anxiety? An exploratory evaluation of book index features.’ The Indexer 20(2), 64–8.
Information access or information anxiety? An exploratory evaluation of book index features
The Indexer
20
64
8
Lipetz, B.-A. (1989) ‘The usefulness of indexes.’ The Indexer 16(3), 173–6.
The usefulness of indexes
The Indexer
16
173
6
Markey, K. (2007) ‘Twenty-five years of end-user searching, part 2: Future research directions.’ Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(8), 1123–30.
Twenty-five years of end-user searching, part 2: Future research directions
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
58
1123
30
Ménard, E. (2011) ‘Chicken or egg theory: Do we truly know how they search?’ The Indexer 29(4), 150–6.
Chicken or egg theory: Do we truly know how they search?
The Indexer
29
150
6
Milstead, J. L. (1994) ‘Needs for research in indexing.’ Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45(8), 577–82.
Needs for research in indexing
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
45
577
82
Montuori, A. (2005) ‘Literature review as a creative inquiry: reframing scholarship as a creative process.’ Journal of Transformative Education 3(4), 374–93.
Literature review as a creative inquiry: reframing scholarship as a creative process
Journal of Transformative Education
3
374
93
Morville, P. (2005) Ambient findability. Sebastopol, Calif.: O’Reilly Media.
Ambient findability
Mulvany, N. (1994) ‘Online help systems: A multimedia indexing opportunity’, In R. Fidel et al (eds), Challenges in indexing electronic text and images. Medford, N.J.: American Society for Information Science.
Online help systems: A multimedia indexing opportunity
Challenges in indexing electronic text and images
Mulvany, N. (2005) Indexing books, 2nd edn. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
Indexing books
Noorhidawati, A. and Gibb, F. (2008) ‘How students use e-books – reading or referring?’ Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science 13(2), 1–14.
How students use e-books – reading or referring?
Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science
13
1
14
Olason, S. C. (2000) ‘Let’s get usable! Usability studies for indexes.’ The Indexer 22(2), 91–5.
The Indexer
22
91
5
Regazzi, J. J. (1980) ‘Evaluating indexing systems: a review after Cranfield’ The Indexer 12(1), 14–21.
Evaluating indexing systems: a review after Cranfield
The Indexer
12
14
21
Ryan, C. N. and Henselmeier, S. (2000) ‘Usability testing at Macmillan USA.’ Key Words 8(6), 198–202.
Usability testing at Macmillan USA
Key Words
8
198
202
Shuter, J. (1993) ‘Standards for indexes: where do they come from and what use are they?’ pp. 79–86 in Proceedings from the American Society of Indexers 25th Annual Meeting, Alexandria, Va., 20–22 May.
Standards for indexes: where do they come from and what use are they?
Proceedings from the American Society of Indexers 25th Annual Meeting, Alexandria, Va., 20–22 May
79
86
Solomon, P. (2002) ‘Discovering information in context.’ Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 229–64.
Discovering information in context
Annual Review of Information Science and Technology
229
64
Staiger, J. (2012) ‘How e-books are used: a literature review of the e-book studies conducted from 2006 to 2011.’ Reference and User Services Quarterly 51(4), 355–65.
How e-books are used: a literature review of the e-book studies conducted from 2006 to 2011
Reference and User Services Quarterly
51
355
65
Vakkari, P. (2003) ‘Task-based information searching.’ Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 37(1), 413–64.
Task-based information searching
Annual Review of Information Science and Technology
37
413
64
Van der Meij, H. (2002) ‘Styling the index: Is it time for a change?’ Journal of Information Science 28(3), 243–51.
Styling the index: Is it time for a change?
Journal of Information Science
28
243
51
Weinberg, B. H. (1994) ‘Indexes: a chapter from The Chicago manual of style, 14th edition: a review.’ The Indexer 19(2), 105–9.
Indexes: a chapter from The Chicago manual of style, 14th edition: a review
The Indexer
19
105
9
Weinberg, B. H. (1999) ‘Improved internet access: guidance from research on indexing and classification.’ Bulletin of the American Sociey for Information Science 25(2), 26–9.
Improved internet access: guidance from research on indexing and classification
Bulletin of the American Sociey for Information Science
25
26
9
Wellisch, H. H. (1991) Indexing from A to Z. New York: H. W. Wilson.
Indexing from A to Z
Williams, P. L. and Bakewell, K. G. B. (1999) ‘Indexing children’s information books.’ The Indexer 21(4), 174–9.
The Indexer
21
174
9
Wilson, T. D. (2006) ‘Information-seeking behaviour and the digital information world.’ The Indexer 25(1), 28–31.
Indexing children’s information books.
The Indexer
21
174
9
Wittmann, C. (1990) ‘Subheadings in award-winning book indexes: a quantitative evaluation.’ The Indexer 17(1), 3–6.
Subheadings in award-winning book indexes: a quantitative evaluation
The Indexer
17
3
6
Abdullah, N. (2008) ‘A study into usability of tools for searching and browsing e-books with particular reference to back-of-thebook index.’ Dissertation, University of Malaya.
Professional women on their professions: indexing
Abdullah, N. and Gibb, F. (2007) ‘Students’ reactions towards e-books in an university library collection.’ International Journal of the Book 5(1), 63–72.
International Journal of the Book
5
63
72
Abdullah, N. and Gibb, F. (2008a) ‘Students’ attitudes towards e-books in a Scottish higher education institute: Part 1.’ Library Review 57(8), 593–605.
Library Review
57
593
605
Abdullah, N. and Gibb, F. (2008b) ‘Students’ attitudes towards e-books in a Scottish higher education institute: Part 2 – analysis of e-book usage.’ Library Review 57(9), 676–89.
Library Review
57
676
89
Abdullah, N. and Gibb, F. (2008c) ‘Using a task-based approach in evaluating the usability of BoBIs in an e-book environment’, pp. 246–57 in C. Macdonald et al. (eds), Advances in information retrieval: lecture notes in computer science. Springer. http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-540-78646-7/page/2
Abdullah, N. and Gibb, F. (2009) ‘Students’ attitudes towards e books in a Scottish higher education institute: Part 3 – search and browse tasks.’ Library Review 58(1), 17–27.
Students’ attitudes towards e books in a Scottish higher education institute: Part 3 – search and browse tasks
International Journal of the Book
5
63
72
Allen, B. L. (1991) ‘Cognitive research in information science’, pp. 3–37 in M. E. Williams (ed.), Annual review of information science and technology. Medford, N.J.: Learned Information.
Cognitive research in information science
Annual review of information science and technology
3
37
Anderson, J. D. (1993) ‘Indexing standards: Are they possible? What good are they? Why bother?’ Paper presented at Proceedings from the American Society of Indexers 25th Annual Meeting, Port Aransas, Tex.
Indexing standards: Are they possible? What good are they? Why bother?
Anderson, J. D. and Pérez-Carballo, J. (2005) Information retrieval and design. St Petersburg, Fla.: Ometeca Institute.
Information retrieval and design
Babu, R. R. (1992) ‘User preferences for indexes in philosophical books: a survey.’ Library Review 4(1), 47–55.
User preferences for indexes in philosophical books: a survey
Library Review
4
47
55
Bakewell, K. (1990) ‘Towards a new international standard on indexing’ . The Indexer 17(2), 127–8.
Towards a new international standard on indexing
The Indexer
17
127
8
Bakewell, K. G. B. (1993) ‘Research in indexing: More needed?’ The Indexer 18(3), 147–51.
Research in indexing: More needed?
The Indexer
18
147
51
Bakewell, K. et al. (2000) Indexing children’s books, ed. Michèle Clarke. Occasional Papers on Indexing No. 5. Sheffield, UK: Society of Indexers.
Indexing children’s books
Banwell, L. and Coulson, G. (2004) ‘Users and user study methodology: the JUBILEE project’, Information Research 9(2). www.informationr.net/ir/9-2/paper167.html
Barnum, C. M., Henderson, E., Hood, A. and Jordan, R. (2004) ‘Index versus full-text search: A usability study of user preference and performance.’ Technical Communication 51(2), 185–206.
Users and user study methodology: the JUBILEE project
Technical Communication
51
185
206
Bell, H. K. (1993) ‘Vive la différence! The survival of the softest.’ The Indexer 18(4), 231–6.
Vive la différence! The survival of the softest
The Indexer
18
231
6
Bell, H. K. (1996) ‘Whom should we aim to please?’ The Indexer 20(1), 3–5.
Whom should we aim to please?
The Indexer
20
3
5
Berg, S. A., Hoffmann, K. and Dawson, D. (2010) ‘Not on the same page: undergraduates’ information retrieval in electronic and print books.’ Journal of Academic Librarianship 36(6), 518–25.
Journal of Academic Librarianship
36
518
25
Bishop, A. P., Liddy, E. D. and Settel, B. (1991a) ‘Index quality study, part I: Quantitative description of back-of-book indexes’, pp. 15–51 in Indexing tradition and innovation. Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the American Society of Indexers. Wheat Ridge, Colo.: ASI.
Index quality study, part I: Quantitative description of back-of-book indexes
15
51
Bishop, A. P., Liddy, E. D. and Settel, B. (1991b) ‘Index quality study, part II: Publishers’ survey and qualitative assessment’, pp. 53–79 in Indexing tradition and innovation. Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the American Society of Indexers. Wheat Ridge, Colo.: ASI.
Indexing tradition and innovation. Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the American Society of Indexers
53
79
Bosschieter, P. (2006) ‘Back-of-the-book indexing in the Netherlands today.’ The Indexer 25(2), 86–8.
Back-of-the-book indexing in the Netherlands today
The Indexer
25
86
8
Browne, G. and Jermey, J. (2007) The indexing companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The indexing companion
Calvert, D. (1996) ‘Deconstructing indexing standards’. The Indexer 20(2), 74–7.
Deconstructing indexing standards
The Indexer
20
74
7
Case, D. O. (2012) Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior, 3rd edn. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior
Cevolini, A. (2014) ‘Indexing as preadaptive advance: a socioevolutionary perspective’. The Indexer 32(2), 50–7.
Indexing as preadaptive advance: a socioevolutionary perspective
The Indexer
32
50
7
Cleveland, D. B. and Cleveland, A. D. (1990) Introduction to indexing and abstracting. Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.
Introduction to indexing and abstracting
Cooper, H. (1998) Synthesizing research: a guide for literature reviews, 2nd edn. Sage.
Synthesizing research: a guide for literature reviews
Diodato, V. (1994) ‘User preferences for features in back of book indexes.’ Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45(7), 529–36.
User preferences for features in back of book indexes
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
45
529
36
Diodato, V. and Gandt, G. (1991) ‘Back of book indexes and the characteristics of author and nonauthor indexing: report of an exploratory study.’ Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42(5), 341–50.
Back of book indexes and the characteristics of author and nonauthor indexing: report of an exploratory study
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
42
341
50
Evans, R. T. (2002) ‘Usability test: Index vs. full-text search.’ Paper presented at Southern Polytechnic State University, Marietta, Ga., 10 January.
Usability test: Index vs. full-text search
Fidel, R. (2008) ‘Are we there yet? Mixed methods research in library and information science.’ Library and Information Science Research, 30, 265–72.
Are we there yet? Mixed methods research in library and information science
Library and Information Science Research
265
72
Flatoff, J. (2007) ‘Do children use indexes differently than adults? Summary of an informal survey of index users.’ Key Words 15(1), 19–30.
Do children use indexes differently than adults? Summary of an informal survey of index users
Key Words
15
19
30
Gratch, B., Settel, B. and Atherton, P. (1978) ‘Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences.’ The Indexer 11(2), 14–23.
Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences
The Indexer
11
14
23
Hanson, F. A. (2007) The trouble with culture: How computers are calming the culture wars. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press.
The trouble with culture: How computers are calming the culture wars
Harman, D. (2011) ‘Information retrieval evaluation’, in G. Marchionini (ed.), Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services. San Rafael, Calif.: Morgan & Claypool.
Information retrieval evaluation
Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services
Hert, C. A., Jacob, E. K. and Dawson, P. (2000) ‘A usability assessment of online indexing structures in the networked environment.’ Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51(1), 971–88.
A usability assessment of online indexing structures in the networked environment
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
51
971
88
Hjorland, B. (2011) ‘The importance of theories of knowledge: Indexing and information retrieval as an example.’ Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(1), 72–7.
The importance of theories of knowledge: Indexing and information retrieval as an example
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
62
72
7
Johncocks, B. (2008a) ‘Web 2.0 and users’ expectations of indexes.’ The Indexer 26(1), 18–24.
The Indexer
26
18
24
Johncocks, B. (2008b) ‘Indexing by numbers: Is there scope for metrics in index evaluation?’ The Indexer 26(4), 158–62.
Indexing by numbers: Is there scope for metrics in index evaluation?
The Indexer
26
158
62
Kingsley, I. (2008) ‘The usability of academic library website indexes: an investigation.’ The Indexer 26(2), 71–8.
The usability of academic library website indexes: an investigation
The Indexer
26
71
8
Kleinberg, I. (1993) ‘Making the case for professional indexers: Where is the proof?’ pp. 139–46 in Proceedings from the American Society of Indexers 25th Annual Meeting, Alexandria, Va., 20–22 May.
Making the case for professional indexers: Where is the proof?
Proceedings from the American Society of Indexers 25th Annual Meeting, Alexandria, Va., 20–22 May
139
46
Knight, G. N. (1979) Indexing, the art of. London: Allen & Unwin.
Indexing, the art of
Landes, C. (2009) ‘Testing usability: “Experience an index usability test” at the ASI Conference (Portland, 2009).’ The Indexer 27(4), 152–63.
Testing usability: “Experience an index usability test” at the ASI Conference (Portland, 2009)
The Indexer
27
152
63
Liddy, E. D. and Jörgensen, C. L. (1993) ‘Reality check! Book index characteristics that facilitate information access’, pp. 125–38 in Proceedings from the American Society of Indexers 25 th Annual Meeting, Alexandria, Va., 20–22 May.
Reality check! Book index characteristics that facilitate information access
Proceedings from the American Society of Indexers 25 th Annual Meeting, Alexandria, Va., 20–22 May
125
38
Liddy, E. D. and Jörgensen, C. L. (1996) ‘Information access or information anxiety? An exploratory evaluation of book index features.’ The Indexer 20(2), 64–8.
Information access or information anxiety? An exploratory evaluation of book index features
The Indexer
20
64
8
Lipetz, B.-A. (1989) ‘The usefulness of indexes.’ The Indexer 16(3), 173–6.
The usefulness of indexes
The Indexer
16
173
6
Markey, K. (2007) ‘Twenty-five years of end-user searching, part 2: Future research directions.’ Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(8), 1123–30.
Twenty-five years of end-user searching, part 2: Future research directions
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
58
1123
30
Ménard, E. (2011) ‘Chicken or egg theory: Do we truly know how they search?’ The Indexer 29(4), 150–6.
Chicken or egg theory: Do we truly know how they search?
The Indexer
29
150
6
Milstead, J. L. (1994) ‘Needs for research in indexing.’ Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45(8), 577–82.
Needs for research in indexing
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
45
577
82
Montuori, A. (2005) ‘Literature review as a creative inquiry: reframing scholarship as a creative process.’ Journal of Transformative Education 3(4), 374–93.
Literature review as a creative inquiry: reframing scholarship as a creative process
Journal of Transformative Education
3
374
93
Morville, P. (2005) Ambient findability. Sebastopol, Calif.: O’Reilly Media.
Ambient findability
Mulvany, N. (1994) ‘Online help systems: A multimedia indexing opportunity’, In R. Fidel et al (eds), Challenges in indexing electronic text and images. Medford, N.J.: American Society for Information Science.
Online help systems: A multimedia indexing opportunity
Challenges in indexing electronic text and images
Mulvany, N. (2005) Indexing books, 2nd edn. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
Indexing books
Noorhidawati, A. and Gibb, F. (2008) ‘How students use e-books – reading or referring?’ Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science 13(2), 1–14.
How students use e-books – reading or referring?
Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science
13
1
14
Olason, S. C. (2000) ‘Let’s get usable! Usability studies for indexes.’ The Indexer 22(2), 91–5.
The Indexer
22
91
5
Regazzi, J. J. (1980) ‘Evaluating indexing systems: a review after Cranfield’ The Indexer 12(1), 14–21.
Evaluating indexing systems: a review after Cranfield
The Indexer
12
14
21
Ryan, C. N. and Henselmeier, S. (2000) ‘Usability testing at Macmillan USA.’ Key Words 8(6), 198–202.
Usability testing at Macmillan USA
Key Words
8
198
202
Shuter, J. (1993) ‘Standards for indexes: where do they come from and what use are they?’ pp. 79–86 in Proceedings from the American Society of Indexers 25th Annual Meeting, Alexandria, Va., 20–22 May.
Standards for indexes: where do they come from and what use are they?
Proceedings from the American Society of Indexers 25th Annual Meeting, Alexandria, Va., 20–22 May
79
86
Solomon, P. (2002) ‘Discovering information in context.’ Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 229–64.
Discovering information in context
Annual Review of Information Science and Technology
229
64
Staiger, J. (2012) ‘How e-books are used: a literature review of the e-book studies conducted from 2006 to 2011.’ Reference and User Services Quarterly 51(4), 355–65.
How e-books are used: a literature review of the e-book studies conducted from 2006 to 2011
Reference and User Services Quarterly
51
355
65
Vakkari, P. (2003) ‘Task-based information searching.’ Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 37(1), 413–64.
Task-based information searching
Annual Review of Information Science and Technology
37
413
64
Van der Meij, H. (2002) ‘Styling the index: Is it time for a change?’ Journal of Information Science 28(3), 243–51.
Styling the index: Is it time for a change?
Journal of Information Science
28
243
51
Weinberg, B. H. (1994) ‘Indexes: a chapter from The Chicago manual of style, 14th edition: a review.’ The Indexer 19(2), 105–9.
Indexes: a chapter from The Chicago manual of style, 14th edition: a review
The Indexer
19
105
9
Weinberg, B. H. (1999) ‘Improved internet access: guidance from research on indexing and classification.’ Bulletin of the American Sociey for Information Science 25(2), 26–9.
Improved internet access: guidance from research on indexing and classification
Bulletin of the American Sociey for Information Science
25
26
9
Wellisch, H. H. (1991) Indexing from A to Z. New York: H. W. Wilson.
Indexing from A to Z
Williams, P. L. and Bakewell, K. G. B. (1999) ‘Indexing children’s information books.’ The Indexer 21(4), 174–9.
The Indexer
21
174
9
Wilson, T. D. (2006) ‘Information-seeking behaviour and the digital information world.’ The Indexer 25(1), 28–31.
Indexing children’s information books.
The Indexer
21
174
9
Wittmann, C. (1990) ‘Subheadings in award-winning book indexes: a quantitative evaluation.’ The Indexer 17(1), 3–6.
Subheadings in award-winning book indexes: a quantitative evaluation
The Indexer
17
3
6