Town Planning Review

Localism in practice: lessons from a pioneer neighbourhood plan in England

Town Planning Review (2015), 86, (5), 587–609.

Abstract

The UK Government claimed that its 2011 Localism Act would shift power (back) to local communities and neighbourhoods so that they can manage their affairs in their own interests. One of the principal ways this was intended to happen was through the production of Neighbourhood Development Plans (NDPs). In this paper we use a longitudinal case study of the first NDP to be adopted to analyse the extent to which it meets the expectations placed upon this new element of the English planning system, and consequently the implications for the success or otherwise of ‘localism’ more broadly. We explore issues including the legitimacy of localist planning processes, the capacity of communities to take the opportunities open to them and the extent to which higher tiers of governance can frame and constrain the activities of lower tiers.

Access Token
£25.00

ALLMENDINGER, P. and HAUGHTON, G. (2010), ‘Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28, 803–18. D.O.I., 10.1068/c091613 www.envplan.com/allvols.cgi?journal=C Google Scholar

ALLMENDINGER, P. and HAUGHTON, G. (2012), ‘Post-political spatial planning in England: a crisis of consensus?’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, 89–103. Post-political spatial planning in England: a crisis of consensus? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37 89 103 Google Scholar

ARNSTEIN, S. (1969), ‘A ladder of citizen participation’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 35, 216–24. A ladder of citizen participation Journal of the American Planning Association 35 216 24 Google Scholar

BELL, D., GRAY, T. and HAGGETT, C. (2005), ‘The “social gap” in wind farm siting decisions: explanations and policy responses’, Environmental Politics, 14, 460–77. The “social gap” in wind farm siting decisions: explanations and policy responses Environmental Politics 14 460 77 Google Scholar

BEST, R. and SHUCKSMITH, M. (2006), Homes for Rural Communities: Report of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation Rural Housing Policy Forum, York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Homes for Rural Communities: Report of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation Rural Housing Policy Forum Google Scholar

CAMERON, D. (2010), ‘This is a government that will give power back to the people’, The Observer, 11 September 2010, 17. This is a government that will give power back to the people The Observer 17 Google Scholar

CLIFFORD, B. P. and WARREN, C. R. (2005), ‘Development and the environment: perception and opinion in St Andrews, Scotland’, Scottish Geographical Journal, 121, 355–84. Development and the environment: perception and opinion in St Andrews, Scotland Scottish Geographical Journal 121 355 84 Google Scholar

CUMBERLAND & WESTMORLAND HERALD (2013), Planning minister’s praise for Upper Eden even though mandarins in London don’t know where it is! [online], http://cwherald.com/a/archive/planning-minister-s-praise-for-upper-eden-even-though-mandarins.402567.html (accessed 12 March 2015). Google Scholar

CURRY, N. R. (2012), ‘Sustainable rural development in England: policy problems and equity consequences’, Local Economy, 27, 95–102. Sustainable rural development in England: policy problems and equity consequences Local Economy 27 95 102 Google Scholar

DAVOUDI, S. (2013), ‘On democracy: representation beyond the ballot box’, disP –The Planning Review, 49, 4–5. D.O.I., 10.1080/02513625.2013.858997 On democracy: representation beyond the ballot box disP –The Planning Review 49 4 5 Google Scholar

DAVOUDI, S. and COWIE, P. (2013), ‘Are English neighbourhood forums democratically legitimate?’, Planning Theory & Practice, 14, 562–6. D.O.I., 10.1080/14649357.2013.851880 Are English neighbourhood forums democratically legitimate? Planning Theory & Practice 14 562 6 Google Scholar

DCLG (DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2001), Planning: Delivering a Fundamental Change: Green Paper, London, Stationery Office. Google Scholar

DCLG (DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2010), Eric Pickles Puts Stop to Flawed Regional Strategies Today [online], www.communities.gov.uk/news/planningand-building/1632278 (accessed 13 August 2010). Google Scholar

DCLG (DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2011), A Plain English Guide to the Localism Act, London, Department for Communities and Local Government. Google Scholar

DCLG (DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2012a), Localism Act: Power Shift to Communities Charges on [online], Department for Communities and Local Government, www.communities.gov.uk/news/communities/2126308 (accessed 9 July 2012). Google Scholar

DCLG (DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2012b), National Planning Policy Framework, London, Department for Communities and Local Government. Google Scholar

DCLG (DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2012c), Neighbourhood Planning – Frequently Asked Questions [online], www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/2099152.pdf (accessed 21 August 2012). Google Scholar

DCLG (DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2013), Historic First as Neighbourhood Plan is Voted in by Community [online], www.gov.uk/government/news/historic-first-as-neighbourhood-plan-is-voted-in-by-community (accessed 12 March 2015). Google Scholar

DETR and MAFF (2000), Our Countryside: The Future –A Fair Deal For Rural England, London, HMSO for Department for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Google Scholar

DOE and MAFF (1995), Rural England: A Nation Committed to a Living Countryside, London, HMSO on behalf of Department of the Environment and Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries. Google Scholar

EDC (EDEN DISTRICT COUNCIL) (2009), Statement of Consultation: Core Strategy Development Plan Document [online], Eden District Council, www.eden.gov.uk/EasySiteWeb/GatewayLink.aspx?alId=13954 (accessed 6 July 2012). Google Scholar

EDC (EDEN DISTRICT COUNCIL) (2010), Core Strategy Development Plan Document, Penrith, Eden District Council. Google Scholar

EDC (EDEN DISTRICT COUNCIL) (2011a), Eden District Council Response to Upper Eden Neighbourhood Development Plan Consultation, Penrith, Eden District Council. Google Scholar

EDC (EDEN DISTRICT COUNCIL) (2011b), Executive Minutes: 8 February 2011 www.eden.gov.uk/democracy/meetings/committee-meeting-agenda-and-minutes/agenda-and-minutes-2011/executive/cm-c-8february2011-minutes/?vAction=fntDown (accessed 16 December 2012). Google Scholar

EDC (EDEN DISTRICT COUNCIL) (2012a), Eden District Council Response to Upper Eden Neighbourhood Development Plan Examination Proposal, Penrith, Eden District Council. Google Scholar

EDC (EDEN DISTRICT COUNCIL) (2012b), Profile of Eden [online], Eden District Council, www.eden.gov.uk/your-community/edens-statistics/profile-of-eden/ (accessed 11 July 2012). Google Scholar

ELLIS, G. (2004), ‘Discourses of objection: towards an understanding of third-party rights in planning’, Environment and Planning A, 36, 1549–70. Discourses of objection: towards an understanding of third-party rights in planning Environment and Planning A 36 1549 70 Google Scholar

FLYVBJERG, B. (2006), ‘Five misunderstandings about case-study research’, Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219–45. D.O.I., 10.1177/1077800405284363 Five misunderstandings about case-study research Qualitative Inquiry 12 219 45 Google Scholar

GALLENT, N., JUNTTI, M., KIDD, S. and SHAW, D. (2008), Introduction to Rural Planning, Abingdon, Routledge. Introduction to Rural Planning Google Scholar

GALLENT, N. and ROBINSON, S. (2012), Neighbourhood Planning – Communities, Networks and Governance, Bristol, The Policy Press. Neighbourhood Planning – Communities, Networks and Governance Google Scholar

GEOGHEGAN, J. (2013a), Neighbourhood Planning – People’s Choice [online], www.planningresource.co.uk/article/1175758/neighbourhood-planning---peoples-choice (accessed 12 March 2015). Google Scholar

GEOGHEGAN, J. (2013b), ‘Poorer areas see few local plan applications’, Planning, 26 March 2013, 4–5 Poorer areas see few local plan applications Planning 4 5 Google Scholar

GUNN, S. and VIGAR, G. (2012), ‘Reform processes and discretionary acting space in English planning practice, 1997–2010’, Town Planning Review, 83, 533–52. Reform processes and discretionary acting space in English planning practice, 1997–2010 Town Planning Review 83 533 52 Google Scholar

HALL, P. (2011), ‘The Big Society and the evolution of ideas’, Town and Country Planning, 80, 59–60. The Big Society and the evolution of ideas Town and Country Planning 80 59 60 Google Scholar

HEALEY, J. (2010), Open Letter to Iain Duncan Smith [online], http://johnhealey.labourhome.org/2010/06/28/open-letter-to-iain-duncan-smith/ (accessed 18 August 2010). Google Scholar

HILLIER, J. and HEALEY, P. (2008), ‘Introduction to Part I’, in J. Hillier and P. Healey (eds), Contemporary Movements in Planning Theory, Hampshire, Ashgate. Introduction to Part I Contemporary Movements in Planning Theory Google Scholar

HM GOVERNMENT (2010), The Coalition: Our Programme for Government, London, HM Government Cabinet Office. Google Scholar

HOGGART, K. and HENDERSON, S. (2005), ‘Excluding exceptions: housing non-affordability and the oppression of environmental sustainability?’, Journal of Rural Studies, 21, 181–96. Excluding exceptions: housing non-affordability and the oppression of environmental sustainability? Journal of Rural Studies 21 181 96 Google Scholar

INCH, A. (2010), ‘Culture change as identity regulation: the micro-politics of producing spatial planners in England’, Planning Theory and Practice, 11, 359–74. Culture change as identity regulation: the micro-politics of producing spatial planners in England Planning Theory and Practice 11 359 74 Google Scholar

LAKE, R. W. (1993), ‘Planners’ alchemy transforming NIMBY to YIMBY: rethinking NIMBY’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 59, 87–93. Planners’ alchemy transforming NIMBY to YIMBY: rethinking NIMBY Journal of the American Planning Association 59 87 93 Google Scholar

LGIU (LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION UNIT) (2013), Local Government Facts and Figures, www.lgiu.org.uk/local-government-facts-and-figures/ (accessed 29 April 2014). Google Scholar

LOWNDES, V. and SULLIVAN, H. (2008), ‘How low can you go? Rationales and challenges for neighbourhood governance’, Public Administration, 86, 53–74. How low can you go? Rationales and challenges for neighbourhood governance Public Administration 86 53 74 Google Scholar

LYNN, T. and PARKER, G. (2012), ‘Localism and growth?’, Town and Country Planning, 81, 15–19. Localism and growth? Town and Country Planning 81 15 19 Google Scholar

MARGOLIS, H. (1996), Dealing With Risk: Why the Public and Experts Disagree on Environmental Issues, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Dealing With Risk: Why the Public and Experts Disagree on Environmental Issues Google Scholar

MOSELEY, M. (2002), ‘Bottom-up “village action plans”: some recent experience in rural England’, Planning Practice and Research, 17, 387–405. Bottom-up “village action plans”: some recent experience in rural England Planning Practice and Research 17 387 405 Google Scholar

MURDOCH, J., LOWE, P., WARD, N. and MARSDEN, T. (2003), The Differentiated Countryside, New York, NY, Routledge. The Differentiated Countryside Google Scholar

NEWBY, H. (1985), Green and Pleasant Land?: Social Change in Rural England, London, Wildwood House. Green and Pleasant Land?: Social Change in Rural England Google Scholar

O’CONNOR, R. (2010), ‘Nimbys secure their charter’, The Times, May 26 2010. Nimbys secure their charter The Times Google Scholar

ODPM (OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER) (2004), Community Involvement in Planning: The Government’s Objectives, London, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Google Scholar

ORME, J. (2010), ‘Why are some campaigners calling the Localism Bill a Nimby’s charter?’, The Independent, 17 December 2010. Why are some campaigners calling the Localism Bill a Nimby’s charter? The Independent Google Scholar

OWEN, S. (1998), ‘The role of village design statements in fostering a locally responsive approach to village planning and design in the UK’, Journal of Urban Design, 3, 359–80. The role of village design statements in fostering a locally responsive approach to village planning and design in the UK Journal of Urban Design 3 359 80 Google Scholar

OWEN, S. (2002), ‘Locality and community: towards a vehicle for community-based decision-making in rural localities in England’, Town Planning Review, 73, 41–61. Locality and community: towards a vehicle for community-based decision-making in rural localities in England Town Planning Review 73 41 61 Google Scholar

OWEN, S., BISHOP, J. and O’KEEFFE, B. (2011), ‘Lost in translation? Some issues encountered in transferring village design statements from England to Ireland’, Urban Design, 16, 405–24. Lost in translation? Some issues encountered in transferring village design statements from England to Ireland Urban Design 16 405 24 Google Scholar

OWEN, S. and MOSELEY, M. (2003), ‘Putting parish plans in their place’, Town Planning Review, 74, 41–64. Putting parish plans in their place Town Planning Review 74 41 64 Google Scholar

OWEN, S., MOSELEY, M. and COURTNEY, P. (2007), ‘Bridging the gap: an attempt to reconcile strategic planning and very local community-based planning in rural England’, Local Government Studies, 33, 49–76. Bridging the gap: an attempt to reconcile strategic planning and very local community-based planning in rural England Local Government Studies 33 49 76 Google Scholar

PARKER, G. (2008), ‘Parish and community-led planning, local empowerment and local evidence bases: an examination of “good practice” in West Berkshire’, Town Planning Review, 79, 61–85. Parish and community-led planning, local empowerment and local evidence bases: an examination of “good practice” in West Berkshire Town Planning Review 79 61 85 Google Scholar

PARKER, G. (2012), ‘Neighbourhood planning: precursors, lessons and prospects’, (Paper presented at 40th Joint Planning Law Conference), New College Oxford. Neighbourhood planning: precursors, lessons and prospects Google Scholar

PARKER, G., LYNN, T., KERSLEY, A. and WARD, S. (2010), The Nexus of Community-Led Planning and Rural Affordable Housing: Towards an Enhanced Process, Bristol, Homes & Communities Agency. The Nexus of Community-Led Planning and Rural Affordable Housing: Towards an Enhanced Process Google Scholar

PARKER, G., LYNN, T. and WARGENT, M. (2015), ‘Sticking to the script? The co-production of neighbourhood planning in England’, Town Planning Review, 86, 519–36. Sticking to the script? The co-production of neighbourhood planning in England Town Planning Review 86 519 36 Google Scholar

PARKER, G., LYNN, T., WARGENT, M. and LOCALITY (2014), User Experience of Neighbourhood Planning in England Research, Reading and London, University of Reading and Locality. User Experience of Neighbourhood Planning in England Research Google Scholar

PARKER, G. and MURRAY, C. (2012), ‘Beyond tokenism? Community-led planning and rational choices: findings from participants in local agenda-setting at the neighbourhood scale in England’, Town Planning Review, 83, 1–28. Beyond tokenism? Community-led planning and rational choices: findings from participants in local agenda-setting at the neighbourhood scale in England Town Planning Review 83 1 28 Google Scholar

PARKER, G. and STREET, E. (2015), ‘Planning at the neighbourhood scale: localism, dialogic politics and the modulation of community action’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, in press. Planning at the neighbourhood scale: localism, dialogic politics and the modulation of community action Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy Google Scholar

PARVIN, P. (2009), ‘Against localism: does decentralising power to communities fail minorities?’, The Political Quarterly, 80, 351–60. Against localism: does decentralising power to communities fail minorities? The Political Quarterly 80 351 60 Google Scholar

RODRIGUEZ-POSE, A. and GILL, N. (2003), ‘The global trend towards devolution and its implications’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21, 333–51. The global trend towards devolution and its implications Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 21 333 51 Google Scholar

RODRIGUEZ-POSE, A. and SANDALL, R. (2008), ‘From identity to the economy: analysing the evolution of the decentralisation discourse’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 54–72. From identity to the economy: analysing the evolution of the decentralisation discourse Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26 54 72 Google Scholar

SHAW, D. and LORD, A. (2007), ‘The cultural turn? Culture change and what it means for spatial planning in England’, Planning, Practice & Research, 22, 63–78. The cultural turn? Culture change and what it means for spatial planning in England Planning, Practice & Research 22 63 78 Google Scholar

SHAW, D. and LORD, A. (2009), ‘From land-use to “spatial planning” – reflections on the reform of the English planning system’, Town Planning Review, 80, 415–35. From land-use to “spatial planning” – reflections on the reform of the English planning system Town Planning Review 80 415 35 Google Scholar

SHUCKSMITH, M. (2000), Exclusive Countryside? Social Inclusion and Regeneration in Rural Britain, York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Exclusive Countryside? Social Inclusion and Regeneration in Rural Britain Google Scholar

SMITH, E. and MARQUEZ, M. (2000), ‘The other side of the NIMBY syndrome’, Society & Natural Resources, 13, 273–80. The other side of the NIMBY syndrome Society & Natural Resources 13 273 80 Google Scholar

STEWART, R. (2012), The Trench Warfare that Built the Big Society [online], www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9185927/The-trench-warfare-that-built-the-Big-Society.html (accessed 12 March 2015). Google Scholar

STURZAKER, J. (2010), ‘The exercise of power to limit the development of new housing in the English countryside’, Environment and Planning A, 42, 1001–16. The exercise of power to limit the development of new housing in the English countryside Environment and Planning A 42 1001 16 Google Scholar

STURZAKER, J. (2011a), ‘Can community empowerment reduce opposition to housing? Evidence from rural England’, Planning Practice and Research, 26, 555–70. Can community empowerment reduce opposition to housing? Evidence from rural England Planning Practice and Research 26 555 70 Google Scholar

STURZAKER, J. (2011b), ‘Resistance to reform – from spatial planning to localism’, Town and Country Planning, 80, 318–21. Resistance to reform – from spatial planning to localism Town and Country Planning 80 318 21 Google Scholar

STURZAKER, J. and SHUCKSMITH, M. (2011), ‘Planning for housing in rural England: Discursive power and spatial exclusion’, Town Planning Review, 82, 169–93. Planning for housing in rural England: Discursive power and spatial exclusion Town Planning Review 82 169 93 Google Scholar

SUTCLIFFE, R. and HOLT, R. (2011), Who is Ready for the Big Society?, Birmingham, Consulting InPlace. Who is Ready for the Big Society? Google Scholar

TAYLOR, M. (2008), Living Working Countryside: The Taylor Review of Rural Economy and Affordable Housing, Wetherby, CLG. Living Working Countryside: The Taylor Review of Rural Economy and Affordable Housing Google Scholar

TEWDWR-JONES, M. (1998), ‘Rural government and community participation: The planning role of community councils’, Journal of Rural Studies, 14, 51–62. Rural government and community participation: The planning role of community councils Journal of Rural Studies 14 51 62 Google Scholar

THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY (2010), Open Source Planning Green Paper, London, The Conservative Party. Google Scholar

TURLEY (2014), Neighbourhood Planning –Plan and Deliver?, London, Turley. Google Scholar

UECP (UPPER EDEN COMMUNITY PLAN) (2008), Upper Eden Community Plan, Kirkby Stephen, Upper Eden Community Plan Group care of Kirkby Stephen Town Council. Google Scholar

UECP (UPPER EDEN COMMUNITY PLAN) (2011), Upper Eden Neighbourhood Development Plan: Issues and Consultation Paper v2.1, Kirkby Stephen, Upper Eden Community Plan. Google Scholar

UECP (UPPER EDEN COMMUNITY PLAN) (2012a), UENDP Area Designation Application [online], Upper Eden Community Plan, http://uecp.org.uk/upper-eden-neighbourhood-development-plan/upper-eden-ndp-area-application/ (accessed 12 March 2015). Google Scholar

UECP (UPPER EDEN COMMUNITY PLAN) (2012b), Upper Eden Neighbourhood Development Plan: Draft Proposal, Kirkby Stephen, Upper Eden Community Plan. Google Scholar

UECP (UPPER EDEN COMMUNITY PLAN) (2012c), Upper Eden Neighbourhood Development Plan: Examination Proposal, Kirkby Stephen, Upper Eden Community Plan. Google Scholar

UECP (UPPER EDEN COMMUNITY PLAN) (2012d), Upper Eden Neighbourhood Development Plan: Summary of Comments and Responses to Initial Consultation [online], Upper Eden Community Plan, http://uecp.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Summary-of-Comments-and-Responses-to-Initial-Consultation.pdf (accessed 12 March 2015). Google Scholar

UECP (UPPER EDEN COMMUNITY PLAN) (2013), Upper Eden Neighbourhood Development Plan, Kirkby Stephen, Upper Eden Community Plan. Google Scholar

VIGAR, G., HEALEY, P., HULL, A. and DAVOUDI, S. (2000), Planning, Governance and Spatial Strategy in Britain: an Institutionalist Analysis, London, Macmillan. Planning, Governance and Spatial Strategy in Britain: an Institutionalist Analysis Google Scholar

WAINWRIGHT, H. (2009), Reclaim the State: Experiments in Popular Democracy, 2nd edn, Calcutta, India, Seagull. Reclaim the State: Experiments in Popular Democracy Google Scholar

WOLSINK, M. (2000), ‘Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support’, Renewable Energy, 21, 49–64. Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support Renewable Energy 21 49 64 Google Scholar

WOLSINK, M. (2006), ‘Invalid theory impedes our understanding: a critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31, 85–91. Invalid theory impedes our understanding: a critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 31 85 91 Google Scholar

WOODIN, S. (2011), ‘The building blocks of neighbourhood’, Town and Country Planning, 80, 77–81. The building blocks of neighbourhood Town and Country Planning 80 77 81 Google Scholar

WYCOMBE DISTRICT COUNCIL (2013), Statement re Daws Hill Judicial Review [online], www.wycombe.gov.uk/news/general/13mar13-statement-re-daws-hill-judicial-review.aspx (accessed 19 June 2013). Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Sturzaker, John

Shaw, Dave