Regulatory planning for economic development in the countryside

Town Planning Review (2009), 80, (2), 201–226.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.80.2.5
Language: English
Pages: 26

Abstract

This article examines the interaction between development control and economic development in the countryside within the context of contemporary debates on shifts in the agricultural sector from productivism to multi-functionality. Using planning application decisions from the case of Northern Ireland for the period 1994–95 to 2005–06, together with insights from high-level key informants with planning, economic development and environmental management expertise, the article critiques a perception that regulatory planning is in line with rural development ambitions to foster a multi-functional countryside. While the quantitative data indicate a high approval rate for economic development projects, the qualitative evidence points to limitations within the policy content and operational practices of the planning system. The article argues that regulatory planning must engage more deeply with rural development objectives.

FormatArticle

£25.00

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

BJORKHAUG, H. and RICHARDS, C. A. (2008), 'Multi-functional agriculture in policy and practice? A comparative analysis of Norway and Australia', Journal of Rural Studies, 24, 98–111. Multi-functional agriculture in policy and practice? A comparative analysis of Norway and Australia Journal of Rural Studies 24 98 111 Google Scholar

CURRY, N. (1993), 'Rural development in the 1990s – does prospect lie in retrospect?' in M. Murray and J. Greer (eds.) Rural Development in Ireland, Aldershot, Ashgate, 21–40. 'Rural development in the 1990s – does prospect lie in retrospect?' Rural Development in Ireland 21 40 Google Scholar

DARD (DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT) (2008a), Farm Diversification – Planning for Take Off! PA180/A/08, Belfast, DARD. Google Scholar

DARD (DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT) (2008b), Countryside Management Scheme 2007–2013, Belfast, DARD. Google Scholar

DAVOUDI, S. (2006), 'Evidence-based planning: rhetoric and reality', DISP, 165, 14–24. Evidence-based planning: rhetoric and reality DISP 165 14 24 Google Scholar

DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT (1993), A Planning Strategy for Rural Northern Ireland, Belfast, HMSO. Google Scholar

ELSON, M., STEENBERG, C. and DOWNING, L. (1998), Rural Development and Land Use Policies, Salisbury, Rural Development Commission. Rural Development and Land Use Policies Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2009), Official Journal of the European Union, L30, 52, 31 January, Brussels, European Commission. Google Scholar

GILG, A. (1996), Countryside Planning – The First Half Century, London, Routledge. Countryside Planning – The First Half Century Google Scholar

JONGENEEL, R. A., POLMAN, N. B. P. and SLANGEN, L. H. G. (2008), 'Why are Dutch farmers going multi-functional?', Land Use Policy, 25, 81–94. Why are Dutch farmers going multi-functional? Land Use Policy 25 81 94 Google Scholar

KEEBLE, D., TYLER, P., BROOM, G. and LEWIS, J. (1992), Business Success in the Countryside: The Performance of Rural Enterprises, London, HMSO. Business Success in the Countryside: The Performance of Rural Enterprises Google Scholar

MARSDEN, T. and SONNINO, R. (2008), 'Rural development and the regional state: denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK', Journal of Rural Studies, 24, 422–31. Rural development and the regional state: denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK Journal of Rural Studies 24 422 31 Google Scholar

MOSELEY, M. (1997), 'New directions in rural community development', Built Environment, 23, 201–209. New directions in rural community development Built Environment 23 201 209 Google Scholar

MURDOCH, J. and LOWE, P. (2003), 'The preservationist paradox: modernism, environmentalism and the politics of spatial division', Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28, 318–32. The preservationist paradox: modernism, environmentalism and the politics of spatial division Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 28 318 32 Google Scholar

MURRAY, M., GREER, J., HOUSTON, D., MCKAY, S. and MURTAGH, B. (2009), 'Bridging top down and bottom up: modelling community preferences for a dispersed rural settlement pattern', European Planning Studies, 17, 441–62. Bridging top down and bottom up: modelling community preferences for a dispersed rural settlement pattern European Planning Studies 17 441 62 Google Scholar

RAY, C. (2000), 'Endogenous socio-economic development in the European Union – issues of evaluation', Journal of Rural Studies, 16, 447–58. Endogenous socio-economic development in the European Union – issues of evaluation Journal of Rural Studies 16 447 58 Google Scholar

RAY, C. (2006), 'Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU', in P. Cloke, T. Marsden and P. Mooney (eds), Handbook of Rural Studies, London, Sage Publications. Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU Handbook of Rural Studies Google Scholar

SCOTT, M. (2004), 'Building institutional capacity in rural Northern Ireland: the role of partnership governance in the LEADER II programme', Journal of Rural Studies, 20, 49–59. Building institutional capacity in rural Northern Ireland: the role of partnership governance in the LEADER II programme Journal of Rural Studies 20 49 59 Google Scholar

SHEAIL, J. (1997), 'Scott revisited: post-war agriculture, planning and the British countryside', Journal of Rural Studies, 13, 387–98. Scott revisited: post-war agriculture, planning and the British countryside Journal of Rural Studies 13 387 98 Google Scholar

THE UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND (2002), Rural Diversification in Farm Buildings: An Investigation into the Relationship between the Re-use of Farm Buildings and the Planning System, Bristol, The University of the West of England. Google Scholar

WILSON, G. A. (2008), 'From weak to strong multifunctionality: conceptualising farm-level multifunctional transitional pathways', Journal of Rural Studies, 24, 367–83. From weak to strong multifunctionality: conceptualising farm-level multifunctional transitional pathways Journal of Rural Studies 24 367 83 Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here