Town Planning Review

Planning praxis: Ethics, values and theory

Town Planning Review (2002), 73, (3), 253–269.

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.73.3.2
Language
English
Pages
17

Abstract

This paper argues that planning needs to be understood fundamentally as spatial ethics, a form of applied ethics; and that it is therefore important that we develop an understanding of how key ideas in ethics relate to planning. The paper uses examples of current planning practice, and Abercrombie's own concerns, to demonstrate how different ethical precepts are engaged in planning. It concludes by arguing the importance of recognising that planning is concerned with values, and that there is a need to make explicit the ethical frameworks through which we debate their application to the making of place and the mediation of space.

Access Token

FormatArticle

£25.00
References Full TextPDF
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

ABERCROMBIE, PATRICK (1926), 'The preservation of rural England', Town Planning Review, 12, 5–56. Google Scholar

ABERCROMBIE, PATRICK (1943), Town and Country Planning, 2nd edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

ASHENDEN, SAMANTHA and OWEN, DAVID (eds) (1999), Foucault contra Habermas, London, Sage. Foucault contra Habermas Google Scholar

BARRETT, CAROL D. (2001), Everyday Ethics for Practicing Planners, Washington, DC, American Planning Association. Everyday Ethics for Practicing Planners Google Scholar

BLACKBURN, SIMON (1998), Ruling Passions, Oxford, Clarendon Press. Ruling Passions Google Scholar

DTLR (DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THE REGIONS) (2001), Planning: Delivering a Fundamental Change, London, HMSO. Google Scholar

FAINSTEIN, SUSAN, (2000), 'New directions in planning theory', Urban Affairs Review, 35, 451–78. New directions in planning theory Urban Affairs Review 35 451 78 Google Scholar

FLYVBJERG, BENT (2001), Making Social Science Matter, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Making Social Science Matter Google Scholar

FORESTER, JOHN (1989), Planning in the Face of Power, Berkeley, CA, UCLA Press. Planning in the Face of Power Google Scholar

HALL, PETER (1995), 'Bringing Abercrombie back from the shades: a look forward and back', Town Planning Review, 66, 227–41. Bringing Abercrombie back from the shades: a look forward and back Town Planning Review 66 227 41 Google Scholar

HEALEY, PATSY (1997), Collaborative Planning, London, Macmillan. Collaborative Planning Google Scholar

HELD, DAVID (1980), Introduction to Critical Theory, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press. Introduction to Critical Theory Google Scholar

HOSKINS,W. G. (1955), TheMaking of the English Landscape, London, Hodder and Stoughton. TheMaking of the English Landscape Google Scholar

MANDELBAUM, SEYMOUR (1979), 'A complete general theory of planning is impossible', Policy Sciences, 11, 59–71. Google Scholar

NEILL, WILLIAM and GORDON, MICHAEL (2001), 'Shaping our future? The Regional Strategic Framework for Northern Ireland', Planning Theory and Practice 2, 31–52. Shaping our future? The Regional Strategic Framework for Northern Ireland Planning Theory and Practice 2 31 52 Google Scholar

O'NEILL, JOHN (1998), The Market, London, Routledge. The Market Google Scholar

OWENS, SUSAN and COWELL, RICHARD (2002), Land and Limits, London, Routledge. Land and Limits Google Scholar

SANDERCOCK, LEONIE (1998), Towards Cosmopolis, London, John Wiley. Towards Cosmopolis Google Scholar

TALEN, EMILY (1999), 'Sense of community and neighbourhood form: an assessment of the social doctrine of New Urbanism', Urban Studies, 36, 1361–79. Sense of community and neighbourhood form: an assessment of the social doctrine of New Urbanism Urban Studies 36 1361 79 Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Upton, Robert