International Development Planning Review

Three decades of rural development projects in Asia, Latin America, and Africa: Learning from successes and failures

International Development Planning Review (2005), 27, (3), 271–296.

Abstract

This article aims to contribute to the discussion about how to make development interventions more effective by analysing the factors contributing to the success or failure of rural development projects. An aggregate level analysis was made of 46 projects in the field of agricultural research (AR), water management (WM), natural resource management (NRM), and integrated rural development (IRD), financed by the Netherlands' Directorate-General for International Cooperation (DGIS) and carried out between 1975–2005 in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Making a distinction between the successful projects and failures, we show the possibilities and limitations of evaluating projects on the basis of the official criteria (relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, sustainability and impact and/or using criteria such as poverty, gender, institutional development, governance and environment). We argue that project performance very much depends on whether interventions 'keep track' with local priorities and trends. This is much more important than 'measuring output' (are results in line with the project goal?) which is wrongly presented as a priority in monitoring and evaluation practices.

Access Token
£25.00
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

BAMBERGER, M. and HEWITT, E. (1986), Monitoring and Evaluating Urban Development Programs. A Handbook for Program Managers and Researchers, World Bank Technical Paper no.53, Washington, DC, World Bank. Google Scholar

BRYCESON, D., VAN DIJK H., HOWARD, p., OORTHUIZEN, J. and ZOOMERS, A. (2005), The Sector Wide Approach in Rural Development. Finding Ways to Alleviate Poverty and Promote Ecological Sustainability, report on behalf of CERES: Research School for Resource Studies for Development. Google Scholar

CARLSSON, J. and WOHLGEMUTH, L. (2000), Learning in Development Cooperation, Expert Group on Development Issues (EGDI) 2. Google Scholar

DGIS (2000), Working Document: GAVIM and the Sectoral Approach, The Hague, Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Google Scholar

DGIS (2003a), Aan elkaar verplicht. Ontwikkelingssamenwerking op weg naar 2015, The Hague, Ministerie voor Buitenlandse Zaken (DGIS). Google Scholar

DGIS (2003b), Sectorale benadering, organiserend principe voor de bilaterale ontwikkelingssamenwerking, groeidocument 2, The Hague, Ministerie voor Buitenlandse Zaken (DGIS), Steungroep sectorale benadering. Google Scholar

EUFORIC (2004), Europe's Forum on International Cooperation ( www.euforic.org Google Scholar

FOSTER, M. (2000), New Approaches to Development Co-operation: What Can We Learn from Experience with Implementing Sector Wide Approaches?, Working Paper 140, Overseas Development Institute, Centre for Aid and Public Expenditure, London. Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

GRINSPUN, A. (2001), Choices for the Poor. Lessons from National Poverty Strategies, New York, United Nations Development Program. Choices for the Poor. Lessons from National Poverty Strategies Google Scholar

LIVINGSTONE, I. (1979), 'On the concept of integrated rural development planning in less developed countries', Journal of Agricultural Economics, 30, 49–53. On the concept of integrated rural development planning in less developed countries Journal of Agricultural Economics 30 49 53 Google Scholar

MAYHEW, S. (2002), 'Donor dealings: the impact of international donor aid on sexual and reproductive health services', International Family Planning Perspectives, 28, 220–24. Donor dealings: the impact of international donor aid on sexual and reproductive health services International Family Planning Perspectives 28 220 24 Google Scholar

OECD/DAC (1991), DAC Principles for Evaluation of Development Assistance, Paris, Development Assistance Committee. Google Scholar

OECD/DAC (1996), Shaping the 21st Century: The Contribution of Development Cooperation, Paris, Development Assistance Committee. Google Scholar

OECD/DAC (1998), Review of the DAC Principles for Evaluation of Development Assistance, Paris, Development Assistance Committee, DAC working party on aid evaluation. Google Scholar

REARDON, T., BERDEGUÉ, J. and ESCOBAR, G. (2001), 'Rural nonfarm employment and incomes in Latin America: overview and policy implications', World Development, 29, 395–409. Rural nonfarm employment and incomes in Latin America: overview and policy implications World Development 29 395 409 Google Scholar

SCHULPEN L. (ed.) (2001), Hulp in ontwikkeling: bouwstenen voor de toekomst van internationale samenwerking, Assen, van Gorcum. Hulp in ontwikkeling: bouwstenen voor de toekomst van internationale samenwerking Google Scholar

UNDP (2004), Human Development Report 2004, New York, United Nations Development Program. Google Scholar

ZOOMERS, E. B. and GEURTEN, G. (1991), A decade of integrated rural development planning: an assessment of PRODERM experiences in Cusco, Peru', Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 82,195–205. A decade of integrated rural development planning: an assessment of PRODERM experiences in Cusco, Peru' Journal of Economic and Social Geography 82 195 205 Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Zoomers, Annelies