Labour History: A Journal of Labour and Social History

Institutional and Social History Interpretations of New Zealand Waterfront Industrial Relations, Depression to Early 1940s

Labour History: A Journal of Labour and Social History (2001), 80, (1), 121–140.

Abstract

The analysis of New Zealand waterfront industrial relations from the early-to-mid-1900s focuses predominantly on rank and file initiatives to alleviate intermittent employment and deplorable working conditions. This paper examines how forces operating beyond the workplace shaped waterfront industrial relations during the 1930s and early 1940s. While clearly important, job control initiatives remained but part of a complex relationship between union leadership and rank and file that worked to drive the watersiders’ claims for improved employment conditions in often-conflicting directions. Important distinctions between coastal and overseas shipping companies also set the boundaries for the type of actions conducted at the point of production. Far from remaining ‘unimportant’ as has been suggested, the arbitration system and the institutional forces of union and employer bargaining structure and strategy drove the industry’s pattern of industrial relations and had a significant influence on waterfront employment.

Access Token
£25.00
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Barry, Michael

Table of Contents

Section TitlePage
1211
1222
1233
1244
1255
1266
1277
1288
1299
13010
13111
13212
13313
13414
13515
13616
13717
13818
13919