Labour History: A Journal of Labour and Social History

Inequality of Luck: Accident Compensation in New Zealand and Australia

Labour History: A Journal of Labour and Social History (2013), 104, (1), 189–210.

Abstract

The romance and liberating effects of the rise of the modern transport and industrial systems have attracted more attention than how accident victims, and their dependents, coped. Every modern society has a system of dealing with “blood on the bitumen” and “coming a gutser” at work or elsewhere but New Zealand is conspicuous in developing a no-fault comprehensive accident compensation system. About the same time, Australia had draft legislation before its legislature that included sickness too. Only New Zealand, however, in 1974, overturned common law and other remedies to institute a radical law reform over “accidents.” This paper considers the failure of policy transfer between New Zealand and Australia on this issue. More generally there has been relatively little historiographical interest in social experiments “down under,” or the expansion in the late twentieth century welfare states, despite the current public policy debate over an Australian disability scheme. It is argued that such expansions of the welfare state, such as no fault accident compensation, are awkward developments for the dominant neoliberal model of the state undermining welfare.

Access Token
£25.00
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Footnotes

*The author would like to thank the two anonymous referees ofLabour Historyfor their comments and suggestions. Google Scholar

1.F. B. Smith, The People’s Health, 1830-1910(:Australian National University Press, 1979). Linda Bryder, Below the Magic Mountain: A Social History of Tuberculosis in Twentieth-Century Britain(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988). A. Hardy, The Epidemic Streets: Infectious Disease and the Rise of Preventive Medicine, 1856-1900(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993). G. Jones, “Captain of All these Men of Death”: The History of Tuberculosis in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Ireland(Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi, 2001). Google Scholar

2.George L. Mosse, Fallen Soldiers: Reshaping the Memory of the World Wars(:Oxford University Press, 1990), 3–4. Joy Damousi, The Labor of Loss: Mourning, Memory and Wartime Bereavement in Australia(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999). Pat Jalland, Changing Ways of Death in Twentieth Century Australia(Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, 2006). Google Scholar

3.Patsy Adam-Smith, The ANZACS(:Thomas Nelson, 1978). During World War I for instance, 60 per cent of New Zealand’s service personnel were casualties, killed or died of wounds; 65 per cent of the Australians who embarked were casualties, which was the highest rate of the allies in the war. Google Scholar

4.Marilyn Lake and Henry Reynolds, with Mark McKenna and Joy Damousi, What’s Wrong with Anzac?: The Militarisation of Australian History(:New South, 2010), argue that Anzac has, unfortunately, become a sacred, untouchable element of the nation. Google Scholar

5.Records for road crash deaths in New Zealand commenced in 1921 and in Australia in 1925. There were 32,850 road deaths in New Zealand from 1921 to 2000 and 166,000 in Australia from 1925 to 2000. Ministry of Transport/Te Manatu Waka, Historical Deaths since 1921(Wellington: Ministry of Transport, 2011). Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Economy, Road Deaths in Australia 1925-2008(Canberra: Australia Government, Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government, 2010). It is more difficult to establish total figures for work-related death but over 2,000 Australians died from work-related causes in the 1990s. K. Purse, “The Evolution of Workers’ Compensation Policy in Australia,”Health Sociology Review14, no. 1 (August 2005): 8-20. Google Scholar

6.An exception isI. B. Campbell, Compensation for Personal Injury in New Zealand: Its Rise and Fall(:Auckland University Press, 1996), 15. Most of the literature is about the integral nature of cars to modernity and urban life, see J. W. Knott, “Speed, Modernity and the Motor Car: The Making of the 1909 Motor Traffic Act in New South Wales,”Australian Historical Studies26, no. 103 (October, 1994): 221-41; and J. W. Knott, “The ‘Conquering Car’: Technology, Symbolism and the Motorisation of Australia before World War II,”Australian Historical Studies31, no. 114 (April 2000): 1-26. Graeme Davison, Car Wars: How the Car Won our Hearts and Conquered our Cities(Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin, 2004). S. Redshaw, In the Company of Cars: Driving as a Social and Cultural Practice(Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008). The exceptions include: Purse, “The Evolution of Workers’ Compensation Policy in Australia”; P. Cowan, “From Exploitation to Innovation: The Development of Workers’ Compensation Legislation in Queensland,”Labour History, no. 73 (November 1997): 93-104; R. Webb, “Appreciable Injury to Health: Confronting Health and Safety in Australia’s Workplaces During the First Half of the Twentieth Century,”The International Journal of the Humanities6, no. 10 (2009): 87-96. Humphrey McQueen, Framework of Flesh: Builders’ Labourers Battle for Health and Safety(Canberra: Ginninderra Press, 2009). Google Scholar

7.SeeMelanie Nolan, “Widows and Grass Widows,”inBreadwinning: New Zealand Women and the State(:Canterbury University Press, 2000), 69–102. Google Scholar

8.Theda Skcopol, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States(:Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1992). Google Scholar

9.P. W. J. Bartrip, Workmen’s Compensation and Twentieth Century Britain: Law, History and Social Policy(:Gower Publishing, 1987). Google Scholar

10.South Australia, Workmen’s Compensation Act 1900;Western Australia, Workers’ Compensation Act 1902;New South Wales, Workmen’s Compensation Act 1910;Tasmania, Workers’ Compensation Act 1910;Victoria, Workers’ Compensation Act 1914;Queensland, Workers’ Compensation Act 1905andWorkers’ Compensation Act 1916.The Commonwealth introduced theCommonwealth Workmen’s Compensation Act 1912;and ACT introduced theWorkmen’s Compensation Ordinance 1951.For a full account, see Safe Work Australia, Comparison of Workers’ Compensation Arrangements in Australia and New Zealand(Canberra: Safe Work Australia, 2011). Google Scholar

11.Sir W. R. Meredith, CJO, Commissioner, Final Report on Laws Relating to the Liability of Employers to Make Compensation to Their Employees for Injuries Received in the Course of Their Employment Which are in Force in Other Countries, and as to How Far Such Laws are Found to Work Satisfactorily(:Government Printer, 1913), accessed March2013,http://www.awcbc.org/common/assets/english%20pdf/meredith_report.pdf.Social Insurance and Allied Services(hereafterBeveridge Report), Cmd 6404 (London: HMSO, 1942).Compensation for Personal Injury in New Zealand: Report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry(hereafterWoodhouse Report), New Zealand Royal Commission of Inquiry into Compensation for Personal Injury (Wellington: Government Printer, 1967).Compensation and Rehabilitation in Australia, Report of the National Committee of Inquiry, July 1974 (Canberra: Australia Government Publishing Service, 1974). Google Scholar

12.Meredith “made enquiry as to the laws in force in the principal European countries, in the United States of America and the Provinces of Canada” and visited “Belgium, England, France and Germany.” See Meredith, Final Report.As part of the 1967 Committee of Inquiry, Justice O. Woodhouse, H. L. Bockett and G. A. Parsons interviewed 167 people in Australia, Canada, Italy, Switzerland, Sweden, the UK, the USA; see “Persons interviewed During Commission’s Visit Overseas,” Appendix 2, Compensation for Personal Injury in New Zealand, 194-201. As part of the 1974 Committee of Inquiry, Justice Meares and the research staff interviewed 163 people from Austria, Canada, Federal Republic of Germany, Finland, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK and the USA, see “Persons Overseas Interviewed by Mr Justice C. L. D. Meares or Members of the Research Staff,” Appendix 3, Compensation and Rehabilitation in Australia, 338-44. Google Scholar

13.Meredith, Final Report.S. Hick, Social Welfare in Canada: Understanding Income Security, 2nd ed.(:Thompson Educational, 2007). Google Scholar

14.Beveridge Report.See alsoP. W. J. Bartrip, “Beveridge, Workmen’s Compensation and the Alternative Remedy,” Journal of Social Policy 14, no. 4(October1985):491–511. Google Scholar

15.F. Pennings, Between Soft and Hard Law: The Impact of International Social Security Standards on National Social Security Law(:Kluwer Law International, 2006), 5–8. Google Scholar

16.Lord Parker of Waddington, “Compensation for Accidents on the Road: An Address,” Current Legal Problems 18(1965), cited byWoodhouse Report.See also P. Siegart, Chairman of the Committee of Justice Society, British Section of the International Commission of Jurists, No Fault on the Roads(London: Stevens, April 1974). Google Scholar

17.At the same time asWoodhouse Reportsimilar schemes were proposed in the USA and UK;Marc A. Franklin, “Replacing the Negligence Lottery: Compensation and Selective Reimbursement,” Virginia Law Review 53(1967):774–814. T. G. Ison, The Forensic Lottery(London: Staples Press, 1967), 54-67. Google Scholar

18.Woodhouse Report, 34.Age, February 28, 1973, from newspaper articles, ACTU Press Cuttings Workers Compensation 1971, 1973-74, N58/533 and N58/534, Noel Butlin Archives of Business and Labour, The Australian National University, ACT (NBABL). Google Scholar

19.See, for example,P. Bartrip, “No-Fault Compensation on the Roads in Twentieth Century Britain,” The Cambridge Law Journal 69, no 2(July2010):263–86. Google Scholar

20.David Hackett Fischer, Fairness and Freedom: A History of Two Open Societies, New Zealand and the United States(:Oxford University Press, 2012), 471–72. Google Scholar

21.Gough Whitlam, The Whitlam Government 1972-1975(:Penguin, 1985), 635. Google Scholar

22.Donald Horne, The Avenue of the Fair Go: A Group Tour of Australian Political Thought(:HarperCollins, 1997). Google Scholar

23.W. P. Reeves, State Experiments in Australia and New Zealand(:Alexander Moring, 1902). S. Goldfinch and Philippa Mein Smith, “Compulsory Arbitration and the Australasian Model of State Development: Policy Transfer, Learning, and Innovation,”Journal of Policy History18, no. 4 (2006): 419-45. Francis Castles, The Working Class and Welfare: Reflections on the Political Development of the Welfare State in Australia and New Zealand, 1890-1980, (Wellington and Sydney: Allen & Unwin in association with Port Nicholson Press, 1985). Marian Sawer, The Ethical State? Social Liberalism in Australia(Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 2003). Google Scholar

24.Stuart Macintyre and Richard Mitchell, eds, Foundations of Arbitration: The Origins and Effects of State Compulsory Arbitration, 1890-1914(:Oxford University Press, 1989). Caroline Daley and Melanie Nolan, eds, Suffrage and Beyond: International Feminist Perspectives(Auckland & Annandale: Auckland University Press & Pluto Press, 1994). Melanie Nolan, “The State Changing its Mind? Australian and New Zealand Governments’ Postwar Policy on Married Women’s Paid Employment,” inDouble Shift: Working Mothers and Social Change in Australia, ed. Pat Grimshaw, John Murphy and Belinda Probert (Melbourne: Circa, Melbourne Publishing Group, 2005), 153-76. Google Scholar

25.Geoffrey Palmer, Compensation for Incapacity: A Study of Law and Social Change in New Zealand and Australia(:Oxford University Press, 1979). Google Scholar

26.J. G. Fleming, The Law of Torts, 8th ed.(:Law Books Co., 1992), 302–8. Google Scholar

27.Ibid., 7. Google Scholar

28.I. Mares, The Politics of Social Risk: Business and Welfare State Development(:Cambridge University Press, 2003), 79–104. Google Scholar

29.Campbell, Compensation for Personal Injury in New Zealand, 12. Google Scholar

30.Report of the Department of Labour, New Zealand, Appendices to the Journals of the House of Representatives (AJHR), H-6 (1895), 7–8. Google Scholar

31.Margaret Tennant, Paupers and Providers: Charitable Aid in New Zealand(:Allen & Unwin and Historical Branch, Dept. of Internal Affairs, 1989), 164. Stevan Eldred-Grigg, New Zealand Working People 1890 to 1990(Palmerston North: Dunmore Press, 1990). Google Scholar

32.Len Richardson, Coal, Class and Community: The United Mine Workers of New Zealand 1880 to 1960(:Auckland University Press, 1995), 65. Google Scholar

33.Ibid., 78. Google Scholar

34.J. Harris, Private Lives. Public Spirit(:Oxford University Press, 1993). V. Markham Lester, “The Employers’ Liability/Workmen’s Compensation Debate of the 1890s Revisited,”The Historical Journal44, no. 2 (2001): 471-95. A. C. Giles, “Railway Accidents and Nineteenth-Century Legislation: ‘Misconduct, Want of Caution of Causes Beyond their Control?’”Labour History Review7, no. 2 (August 2011): 121-42. Google Scholar

35.Workers’ Compensation for Accident Act, 1900, No. 43 Second Schedule s1 (1) (a);Workers’ Compensation Act, 1908, No. 248, s4;Workers’ Compensation Act, 1920, No. 52, s3. Google Scholar

36. New Zealand Transport Worker, January 1, 1924, 6–7; March 1, 1924, 4-5; April 1, 1924, 5. Google Scholar

37. Trades and Labour Council of New Zealand: Report of Annual Conference Held at Wellington, April 1905(:Trades and Labour Councils of New Zealand, 1905), 10–11. Google Scholar

38. Trades and Labour Council of New Zealand: Report of Annual Conference held at Wellington, 20-26 July 1908(:Trades and Labour Councils of New Zealand, 1908), 9–10. Google Scholar

39.J. Anstey, “Workers’ Compensation Amendment Bill,” New Zealand Parliamentary Debates (NZPD) 148(1909):1404. Google Scholar

40.D. G. Green and L. G. Cromwell, Mutual Aid or Welfare State: Australia’s Friendly Societies(:George Allen & Unwin, 1984). Estimates of friendly society membership range; most suggest around 20 per cent of the UK population in the 1890s. See S. Horrell and D. Oxley, “Work and Prudence: Household Responses to Income Variation in Nineteenth Century Britain,”European Review of History4, no. 1 (April2000): 27-58. D. Weinbren and B. James, “Getting a Grip: The Role of Friendly Societies in Australia and Britain Reappraised,”Labour History, no. 81 (May 2005): 87-104. Google Scholar

41.Dominion, April 2, 1918. Figures given by the Provincial Deputy-Grand Master of the Manchester Unity, Independent Order of Oddfellows, the largest New Zealand friendly society. Google Scholar

43.Charles Ewen, Accident Underwriters Association of New Zealand to the Labour Bills Committee, Workers’ Compensation Amendment Bill, AJHR, I-9A, (1911):14–15; see also H. N. Liardet, Ocean Accident and Guarantee Corporation, AJHR, I-9A, (1911): 15-18. Google Scholar

44.Jennifer Carlyon, “Friendly Societies 1842-1939,” New Zealand Journal of History 32, no. 2(October1998):121–42. Erik Olssen, “Friendly Societies in New Zealand 1840-1990,” inSocial Security Mutualism: the Comparative History of Mutual Benefit Societies, ed. M. Van der Linden (Berne: Peter Lang, 1996), 177-206. David Thomson, “Colonial Thrift,”History, Now3, no 1, (1997): 8-13. David Thomson, A World Without Welfare: New Zealand’s Colonial Experiment(Auckland: Auckland University Press with Bridget Williams Books, 1998), 40 ff. See also R. Nobbs, “The Development of Friendly Societies and Life Assurance in Australia,”Journal of the Institute of Actuaries110-13 (1983): 457-66. Google Scholar

45.Carlyon, “Friendly Societies 1842-1939,” 121–42. Google Scholar

46.Hazel Armstrong and Rob Laurs, When the Going Gets Tough: What Happens to Worn-Out Workers?(:Hazel Armstrong Law, 2007). Google Scholar

47.Castles, The Working Class and Welfare. Google Scholar

50.I. B. Campbell, Compensation for Personal Injury in New Zealand: Its Rise and Fall(:Auckland University Press, 1996). Google Scholar

51.Woodhouse Report.Woodhouse chaired three-man commission including H. L. Bockett, the retired Secretary of Labour (1946-64) and G. A. Parsons, Public Accountant. Google Scholar

52.J. E. Martin, Holding the Balance: A History of New Zealand’s Department of Labour 1891-1995(:Canterbury University Press, 1996), 326. Google Scholar

53. Christchurch Star, September 25, 1964. Google Scholar

54.Harold Luntz, The Assessment of Damages for Personal Injury and Death(:Butterworths, 1974). J. O’Connell and R. J. Simon, Payment for Pain and Suffering: Who Wants What, When & Why?(Los Angeles: Insurors Press, 1972). Google Scholar

55.Ison, The Forensic Lotteryand Franklin, “Replacing the Negligence Lottery.”. Google Scholar

56.Jane Stapleton, “Tort, Insurance and Ideology,” The Modern Law Review 58, no. 6(November1995):820–45. She cites the Pearson Committee that estimated that 88 per cent of personal injury claims representing 94 per cent of the total value were against insured defendants: Royal Commission on Civil Liability and Compensation for Personal Injury (Great Britain), Royal Commission on Civil Liability and Compensation for Personal Injury: Report, vol. 2.Statistics and Costings(London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1978), para 509. Google Scholar

57.New Zealand Department of Labour, Personal Injury: A Commentary on the Report of the Royal Commission of Injury into Compensation for Personal Injury in New Zealand(:Government Printer, 1969). G. F. Gairet. al.(Gair Committee), Report of Select Committee on Compensation for Personal Injury in New Zealand(Wellington: Government Printer, 1970). Google Scholar

58.Geoffrey Palmer, “Compensation for Personal Injury: A Requiem for the Common Law in New Zealand,” American Journal of Comparative Law 21(1973):44; and “The Nineteen Seventies: Summary for Presentation to the Accident Compensation Symposium,”Victoria University of Wellington Law Review2, no. 2 (June 2003): 239-40. Google Scholar

59.“A Word from the Editor,” American Journal of Comparative Law 21, no. 1(1973), cited in Palmer, Compensation for Incapacity, 9. W. Pfennigstorf, “Accident Compensation in New Zealand: How Does it Work?”American Bar Foundation Journal6, no. 4 (Fall 1981): 1153-66. Google Scholar

60.For example, see interest by lawyers, medicos and insurance:T. G. Ison, ed., Accident Compensation: A Commentary on the New Zealand Scheme(:Croom Helm, 1980); James A. Henderson, “The New Zealand Accident Compensation Reform,”University of Chicago Law Review48 (1981): 781-801, W. C. Hodge, “No-Fault in New Zealand: It Works,”Insurance Counsel Journal501 (1983): 222-31. R. Smith, “Compensation for Medical Misadventure and Drug Injury in the New Zealand No-Fault System: Feeling the Way,”British Medical Journal284 (1982): 1457-59. C. Brown, “Deterrence in Tort and No-Fault: The New Zealand Experience,”California Law Review73 (1985): 976-1002. E. Deutsch, “Medical Malpractice and Medical Misadventure in New Zealand: Public Insurance in Lieu of Private Liability as Administered by the Courts and the Accident Compensation Commission,”Medicine and Law1 (1982): 345-54. L. West, “Comprehensive No-Fault in New Zealand: A Model for Ontario?”Journal of Law and Social Policy10 (1994): 241-61. Google Scholar

61.Palmer, Compensation for Incapacity, 132–33. Google Scholar

62.D. Connell, The Confessionals of Clyde Cameron 1913-1990(:ABC Enterprises, 1990). B. Guy, A Life on the Left: A Biography of Clyde Cameron(Adelaide: Wakefield Press, 1990). Google Scholar

63.Whitlam, The Whitlam Government, 636. Google Scholar

64.Australian Labor Party, 1972National Campaign, It’s Time: Speaker’s Notes(:ALP Federal Secretariat, 1972). “It’s Time” policy speech written by speechwriter Graham Freudenberg for the Australian Labor Party, delivered by Gough Whitlam for the 1972 Federal elections, at Blacktown Civic Centre in Sydney, 13 November 1972. Google Scholar

65.Whitlam, The Whitlam Government, 635. Google Scholar

66.Harold Luntz, “Looking Back at Accident Compensation: An Australian Perspective,” Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 34, no. 2, (June2003):279–83. Google Scholar

67.National Rehabilitation and Compensation Scheme Committee of Inquiry (Australia), Compensation and Rehabilitation in Australia: Report of the National Committee of Inquiry July 1974(:Australia Government Publishing Service, 1974), 1. Luntz, The Assessment of Damages for Personal Injury and Death, 6-7. The ACTU in its submission argued that a survey conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics in 1968 showed that about 2 million people or 23 per cent of the population covered by the survey suffered from at least one chronic illness, injury or other impairment, Australian, March 19, 1974. Google Scholar

68.E. G. Whitlam, “Traffic Injury Compensation,”(ALP Seminar on Traffic Collisions,, 31 October1971) reported in theMelbourne Sun, November 1, 1971. See earlier statementMelbourne Sun, October 15 1971. Google Scholar

69.Age, November 1, 1971. Google Scholar

70.Melbourne Sun, November 1, 1971. Google Scholar

71.H. J. Souter, Secretary ACTU, 29 September1971, N68/685, NBABL. Google Scholar

73.Australian, October 9, 1971. Google Scholar

74.McQueen, We Built This Countryand McQueen, Framework of Flesh. Google Scholar

76.Australian, August 26, 1971. Google Scholar

77.Various papers about the Building Trades Dispute re Pay of Injured Workers, Industrial Commission of NSW, Master Builders Association of NSW (1971) N58/533, NBABL. For a coherent discussion of the issues, seeVerity Burgmann, Power and Protest: Movements for Change in Australian Society(:Allen and Unwin, 1993), 302. Meredith Burgmann and Verity Burgmann, Green Bans, Red Union: Environmental Activism and the New South Wales Builders Labourers Federation(Sydney: UNSW Press, 1998), 110-17. Google Scholar

78.Australian, May 25, 1971. Google Scholar

79.Ibid., July 22, 1971. Google Scholar

80.Ibid., October 9, 1971. Google Scholar

81.Ibid., August 7, 1971. Google Scholar

82.Department of Works, Conspectus of Workers’ Compensation Acts in Australia(Melbourne: Department of Works, 1955-68). This became 11 main workers’ compensation systems. Eight Australian States and Territories developed their own workers’ compensation laws while the Commonwealth developed three schemes for: Australian Government employees; seafarers; and defence personnel. Google Scholar

83.C. R. Cameron to A. E. Monk, 18 June1956, N21/881, NBABL. Google Scholar

84.Labour Council of New South Wales, Compensation and Research Bulletin, series 1/69 (28 February 1969), N68/1300, NBABL. The Department of Works published the conspectus of workers compensation from 1955 to 1968; the Department of Labour and National Service from 1969 to 1975; the Australian Department of Social Welfare from 1976 to 1992; the Victorian Workcover Authority from 1993 to 2005; the Australian Safety and Compensation Council, on behalf of the Heads of Workers’ Compensation Authorities, 2006 and 2007; and Safe Work Australia from 2008. Google Scholar

86.Age, February 28, 1973;Australian, March 9, 1973. Google Scholar

88. Australian Financial Review, March 5, 1971. Google Scholar

89.Compensation and Rehabilitation in Australia. Google Scholar

90.Raymond Richards, Palmer: The Parliamentary Years(:University of Canterbury Press, 2010), 58–73. Google Scholar

91.W. J. Blum and H. Kalven, Public Law Perspectives on a Private Law Problem: Auto Compensation Plans(:Little, Brown and Co., 1965); W. J. Blum and H. Kalven, “The Empty Cabinet of Dr Calabresi: Auto Accidents and General Deterrence,”University of Chicago Law Review34, no. 2 (Winter 1967): 239-73. Guido Calabresi, “Fault, Accidents and the Wonderful World of Blum and Kaven,”Yale Law Journal75, (1965): 216-32; Guido Calabresi, The Cost of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis(New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970), 24-33. Google Scholar

92.Richards, Palmer. Google Scholar

93.New Zealand Department of Labour, Personal Injury. Google Scholar

94.Geoffrey Palmer, Submission to the Parliamentary Select Committee on Compensation for Personal Injury in New Zealand, 1970, 1-41, Accident Compensation Corporation, Head Office (AACT), series 946, Accession W2978, Box 9, Workers Compensation Act: Comprehensive Compensation for Personal Injury, Select Committee hearings (1970), Archives New Zealand, Wellington. Google Scholar

95.Harold Luntz, Compensation and Rehabilitation: A Survey of the Report of the National Committee of Inquiry into Compensation and Rehabilitation in Australia and the National Compensation Bill 1974(:Butterworths, 1975), 5. Google Scholar

96.Palmer, Compensation for Incapacity, 11. Google Scholar

97.Richards, Palmer, 72. Google Scholar

98.Woodhouse Report.Professor P. S. Atiyah had returned to Britain for personal reasons and so Woodhouse and Meares were the two signatories to the report.Age, July 11, 1974. Google Scholar

99.Age, July 11, 1974. Google Scholar

100.See alsoAustralian Council of Social Services, The Philosophy of the Bill: Compensation and Rehabilitation in Australia, compiled by Philippa Smith for the ACOSS Standing Committee on Economics and Social Welfare(:Australian Council of Social Service, 1975). Google Scholar

101.Whitlam, The Whitlam Government, 640. Google Scholar

102.Age, June 13, 1974. Google Scholar

103.Geoffrey Palmer, memo to the Accident Compensation Commission, 10 October1974, Woodhouse Papers, cited in Palmer, Compensation for incapacity. Google Scholar

104.Franklin, “Replacing the Negligence Lottery”; Ison, The Forensic Lottery, 54–67. Google Scholar

105.Australian, March 19, 1974. Google Scholar

106.Victorian Workcover Authority, Comparison of Workers’ Compensation Arrangements in Australian Jurisdictions, compiled for the Secretariat, Heads of Workers’ Compensation Authorities(:Heads of Workers’ Compensation Authorities, 1995-2000) with comparisons with New Zealand; later Worksafe Victoria, Workers’ Compensation Arrangements in Australia and New Zealand(Melbourne: Heads of Workplace Safety and Compensation Authorities, 2001) and Safe Work Australia, The Comparison of Workers’ Compensation Arrangements in Australia and New Zealand(Melbourne: Heads of Workplace Safety and Compensation Authorities, 2002-). Google Scholar

107.Richards, Palmer, 66. Google Scholar

108.See, for instance, Dolores Janiewski and Paul Morris, New Rights New Zealand: Myths, Moralities and Markets(:Auckland University Press, 2005); and Bruce Jesson, Alannah Ryan and Paul Spoonley, Revival of the Right: New Zealand Politics in 1980s(Auckland: Heinemann Reed, 1988). Google Scholar

109.Jonathon Boston, J. Martin, J. Pallot and Pat Walsh, eds, Reshaping the State: New Zealand’s Bureaucratic Revolution(:Oxford University Press, 1991). Google Scholar

110.Jane Kelsey, At the Crossroads(:Bridget Williams Books, 2002), especially the essay “The Third Way: A Road to Nowhere”. S. Shepard, Broken Circle: The Decline and Fall of the Fourth Labour Government(Wellington: PSL Press, 1994), 4. Google Scholar

111.F. G. Castles, R. Gerritsen and Jack Vowles, eds, The Great Experiment: Labour Parties and Public Policy Transformation in Australia and New Zealand(:Auckland University Press, 1996). Google Scholar

112.USA Today, April 26, 2011, citing Bureau of Economic Analysis and Census bureau data. Google Scholar

113.David Rea, “Government Expenditure and Revenue in New Zealand: A Brief Overview,” Policy Quarterly 5, no. 3(August2009):58–67. In this article, Rea discusses components of core government expenditure as a proportion of GDP, 1972 to 2008, Google Scholar

114.D. Rennie, “Compensation for Work-Related Injury,”inHealth and Safety in New Zealand Workplaces, ed.C. Slappendel(:Dunmore Press, 1995), 124. Michael Quinlan and P. Bohle, Managing Occupational Health and Safety, 2nd ed. (Melbourne: Macmilllan Publishers Australia, 2000). Google Scholar

115.See also the “Third Woodhouse Report” which recommended an end to the disparities between the treatment of accident victims and those incapacitated by sickness or disease:“Personal Injury, Prevention and Recovery,” New Zealand Law Commission Report, no. 4 (:New Zealand Law Commission, 1988). The “Third Woodhouse Report” was prepared by the Law Commission when Sir Owen Woodhouse was its president. Google Scholar

116.Australian Government, Productivity Commission, Disability Care and Support: Productivity Commission Inquiry Report, 2 vols(:Productivity Commission, 2011). Google Scholar

117.T. Abbott, “Coalition Will Act with ALP on Disability Scheme,” The Australian, March 30, 2012. Google Scholar

119.D. P. Dolowitz and David Marsh, “Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature,” Political Studies 44, no. 2(June1996):343–57; and D. P. Dolowitz and David Marsh, “Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy Making,”Governance13, no. 1 (January 2000): 5-23. Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

 Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Nolan, Melanie