Labour History: A Journal of Labour and Social History

“Natural Enemies”? Anzac and the Left to 1919

Labour History: A Journal of Labour and Social History (2014), 106, (1), 143–162.

Abstract

In the wake of the Gallipoli landing in April 1915, there emerged a new, distinctively Australian discursive formation. The Anzac legend was a unique blend of nationalism and militarism increasingly advocated and enshrined at commemorative events. Some pre-war labour writing creates the expectation of contestation around the inherent militarism of that mythology. Rather, Anzac typically produced a shift in the labour movement’s rhetoric around war and nationalism. In the period to 1919, the labour movement frequently constituted itself discursively in such a way as to seek inclusion in the mythology rather than to oppose it.

Access Token
£25.00
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

 Google Scholar

Footnotes

1.John Hirst, “Labor and the Great War,”inThe Australian Century: Political Struggle in the Building of a Nation, ed.Robert Manne(:Text Publishing, 1999), 56. Google Scholar

2.Neville Kirk, “‘Australians for Australia’: The Right, the Labor Party and Contested Loyalties to Nation and Empire in Australia, 1917 to the Early 1930s,” Labour History, no. 91 (November2006):100–1. Google Scholar

3.Nick Dyrenfurth, Heroes and Villains: The Rise and Fall of the Early Australian Labor Party(:Australian Scholarly Publishing, 2011), 182–83. Google Scholar

4.Peter Love, Labour and the Money Power: Australian Labour Populism(:Melbourne University Press, 1984), 73. Google Scholar

5.James Curran, Curtin‘s Empire, (:Cambridge University Press, 2011), 70. Google Scholar

6.Dyrenfurth, Heroes and Villains, 225. Google Scholar

7.Robert Bollard, In the Shadow of Gallipoli: The Hidden History of Australia in World War I(:NewSouth, 2013), 13. Google Scholar

8.Terry Irving, “Labour, State and Nation Building in Australia,”inNationalism, Labour and Ethnicity 1870–1939, ed.Stefan BergerandAngel Smith(:Manchester University Press, 1999), 207;Stuart Macintyre, The Oxford History of Australia, Volume 4: 1901–1942: The Succeeding Age(:Oxford University Press, 1986), 181;Ross McMullin, The Light on the Hill: The Australian Labor Party 1891–1991(:Oxford University Press, 1991), 117. Google Scholar

9.During the war years theDaily Standard, theDaily Herald, theDaily Postand theBarrier Daily Truthwere published in Brisbane, Adelaide, Hobart and Broken Hill respectively. They were supplemented by the weeklies:Labor Call(Melbourne); theAustralian Worker(Sydney); theWestralian Worker(Perth) and theWorker(Brisbane). Each of these organs championed the cause of working-class interests in general and unionism in particular, countered the bias of the conservative press and typically, though not exclusively, supported the parliamentary wing of the Labor Party. Google Scholar

10. Australian Worker, 14 October1914, 1. Google Scholar

11. Direct Action, 1 October1914, 2. Google Scholar

12.John MacDonald, “Democracy and the World War,” Daily Standard, 24 August1914, 4. Google Scholar

13.L. J. Villiers, “The Worker and the War,” Labor Call, 15 October1914, 4–5. Google Scholar

14. Westralian Worker, 14 May1915, 4. Google Scholar

15.Sarah Gregson, “War, Racism and Industrial Relations in an Australian Mining Town, 1916–1935,” Economic and Labour Relations Review 18, no. 1(2007):82. Google Scholar

16.Love, Labour and the Money Power, 57. Google Scholar

17.Left-wing political ideas of a more radical ilk were also promoted by a range of publications emanating from avowedly socialist and syndicalist organisations and individuals active in Australia at the time.Direct Action(Industrial Workers of the World, Sydney), theSocialist(Socialist Party of Victoria), Ross’s Magazine(Melbourne), People(Australian Socialist League, Sydney), theWoman Voter(Womens Political Association, Melbourne) and theInternational Socialist(Australasian Socialist Party, Sydney) too have been considered in this analysis. Google Scholar

18.Carl Bridge, “Anzac Day,”inThe Oxford Companion to Australian Military History, ed.Peter Dennis et al.. (:Oxford University Press, 2009), accessed March 2014 athttp://www.oxfordreference.com/;Marilyn Lake, “Pax International, Women and Australian Peace Movements,” Guardian: The Worker’s Weekly(Sydney) 1513, no. 10(August2011):6. In 1929, Direct Actionprinted a piece entitled “May Day versus Anzac Day” which promoted the former and criticised the latter as “an expression of oppression”; seeDirect Action, 20 April1929, 2. Google Scholar

19. Worker, 5 November1914, 5;Australian Worker, 4 March1915, 1. Google Scholar

20. Barrier Daily Truth, 5 March1915, 2; 15 May1915, 2. Google Scholar

21. Direct Action, 7 October1916, 2. Google Scholar

22. Barrier Daily Truth, 29 December1915, 2; 23 May1917, 2. Google Scholar

23.Cited inLeslie C. Jauncey, The Story of Conscription in Australia(:Macmillan, 1968), 237. Google Scholar

24.Humphrey McQueen, A New Britannia: An Argument Concerning the Social Origins of Australian Radicalism and Nationalism, rev. ed. (:Penguin, 1986), 75. Google Scholar

25.See, for example, theDaily Post, 27 April1916, 5;Daily Standard, 22 April 1916, 4, 6;Australian Worker, 27 April 1916, 5;Daily Herald, 21 April 1917, 3;Westralian Worker, 27 April 1917, 5;Barrier Daily Truth, 29 April 1918, 2. Google Scholar

26. Daily Herald, 25 April1917, 7. Google Scholar

27. Register(Adelaide), 25 April1917, 6. Google Scholar

28. Daily Standard, 25 April1917, 4. Google Scholar

29.John MacDonald, “Democracy and the World War,” Daily Standard, 24 August1914, 4. Google Scholar

30. Brisbane Courier, 25 April1917, 6. Google Scholar

31. Daily Post, 27 April1917, 4. Google Scholar

32. Mercury, 25 April1917, 5. Google Scholar

33.Curran, Curtin’s Empire, 31. Google Scholar

34. Westralian Worker, 3 May1918, 4. Google Scholar

35.Curran, Curtin’s Empire, 15–25. Google Scholar

36.Kirk, “Australians for Australia,” 100–1. Google Scholar

37.Hirst, “Labor and the Great War,” 56. Google Scholar

38.Frank Cain, The Wobblies at War: A History of the I.W.W. and the Great War in Australia(:Spectrum Publications, 1993), 62. Google Scholar

39.Frank Bongiorno, The People’s Party: Victorian Labour and the Radical Tradition 1875–1914(:Melbourne University Press, 1996), 153, 162. Google Scholar

40.Dyrenfurth, Heroes and Villains, 124. Google Scholar

41. Daily Standard, 26 April1916, 6. Google Scholar

42. Woman Voter, 9 November1916, 2. Google Scholar

43. Westralian Worker, 14 May1915, 4. Google Scholar

44. Socialist, 5 May1916, 2. Google Scholar

45. Labor Call, 6 April1916, 6. Google Scholar

46. Westralian Worker, 19 May1916, 2. Google Scholar

47. People, 1 May1917, 2. Google Scholar

48. Australian Worker, 21 January1915, 5. Google Scholar

49.Malcolm Saunders, “A Note on the Wobblies: Misconceptions and Myths about the Industrial Workers of the World in Australia,” Australian Folklore 9(1994):154. Google Scholar

50.Jauncey, The Story of Conscription in Australia, 296. Google Scholar

51. Labor Call, 20 April1916, 4. Google Scholar

52. Ibid., 15 April1917, 4. Google Scholar

53. Daily Standard, 25 April1918, 6. Google Scholar

54. Ibid., 25 April1919, 4. Google Scholar

55.Lyn Spillman, Nation and Commemoration: Creating National Identities in the United States and Australia(:Cambridge University Press, 1997), 92. Google Scholar

56.Graeme Davison, “The Imaginary Grandstand,” Meanjin 61, no. 3(2002):6. Google Scholar

57.Verna Coleman, Adela Pankhurst: The Wayward Suffragette, 1885–1961(:Melbourne University Press, 1996), 78;Raymond Evans, “The Pen and the Sword: Anti-Germanism in Queensland During the Great War, and the Worker,”inThe German Presence in Queensland: Over the Last 150 Years, ed.Manfred JurgensenandAlan Corkhill(:University of Queensland Department of German, 1988), 15. Google Scholar

58. Socialist, 24 March1916, 3. Google Scholar

59.Dyrenfurth, Heroes and Villains, 91–191. Google Scholar

60. Worker(Sydney), 3 October1907, 13; 7 November 1907, 1;Australian Worker, 11 June 1914, 12; 28 October 1915, 10. Google Scholar

61.Janice Pavils, Anzac Day: The Undying Debt(:Lythrum Press, 2007), 2;Register, 14 October 1915, 4. Google Scholar

62.Tocsin, quoted in McQueen, A New Britannia, 241. Google Scholar

63.Grant Mansfield, “‘Unbounded Enthusiasm’: Australian Historians and the Outbreak of the Great War,” Australian Journal of Politics and History 53, no. 3(2007):372–74. Google Scholar

64.Cain, The Wobblies at War, 174. Google Scholar

65. Australian Worker, 29 April1915, 3. Google Scholar

66.McMullin, The Light on the Hill, 117. Google Scholar

67.Mansfield, “Unbounded Enthusiasm,” 363. Google Scholar

68.Evans, “The Pen and the Sword,” 12. Google Scholar

69.Sarah Gregson, “Defending Internationalism in Interwar Broken Hill,” Labour History, no. 86 (May2004):118. Google Scholar

70. Westralian Worker, 21 September1917, 6. Google Scholar

71. Daily Standard, 8 November1917, 4. Google Scholar

72. Westralian Worker, 21 July1916, 5; 18 August1916, 4. Google Scholar

73. Ibid., 19 April1918, 5. Google Scholar

74. Ibid., 13 April1917, 5. Google Scholar

75. Ibid., 16 November1917, 2. Google Scholar

76. Barrier Daily Truth, 23 May1917, 2. Google Scholar

77. Worker, 10 April1919, 17;Barrier Daily Times, 16 November1918, 2. Google Scholar

78. Labor Call, 18 April1918, 11. Google Scholar

79. Westralian Worker, 30 November1917, 7. Google Scholar

80. Ibid., 20 July1917, 5. Google Scholar

81. Ibid., 25 January1918, 3. Google Scholar

82. Ibid., 21 September1917, 6. Google Scholar

83. Ibid., 16 November1917, 2. Google Scholar

84.Kirk, “Australians for Australia,” 101. Google Scholar

85.Raymond Evans, Loyalty and Disloyalty: Social Conflict on the Queensland Homefront, 1914–18(:Allen & Unwin, 1987);Marilyn Lake, A Divided Society: Tasmania during World War I(:Melbourne University Press, 1975);Joan Beaumont, “The Politics of a Divided Society,”inAustralia’s War, 1914–18, ed.Joan Beaumont(:Allen & Unwin, 1995). Google Scholar

86.Beaumont, “The Politics of a Divided Society,” 51. Google Scholar

87.Dan Coward, “Crime and Punishment,”inStrikes: Studies in Twentieth Century Australian Social History, ed.John Iremonger,John Merritt, andGraeme Osborne(:Angus & Robertson in association with the Australian Society for the Study of Labour History, 1973), 61, 68, 77. Google Scholar

88.D. J. Murphy, “Religion, Race and Conscription in World War I,” Australian Journal of Politics and History 20, no. 2(1974):156. Google Scholar

89.Cited inLake, A Divided Society, 115. Google Scholar

90. Queensland Figaro, 21 April1917, 10. Google Scholar

91. Daily Standard, 26 April1917, 8. Google Scholar

92. Ibid., 26 April1918, 4. Google Scholar

93.Frank Cain, “The Industrial Workers of the World and the ALP in Sydney, 1905–1917,”inA Century of Social Change(:Pluto Press, 1992), 64. Google Scholar

94.Coward, “Crime and Punishment,” 76. Google Scholar

95.D. J. Murphy, “Queensland,”inLabor in Politics: The State Labor Parties in Australia 1880–1920, ed.D. J. Murphy(:University of Queensland Press, 1975), 201. Google Scholar

96.Lake, A Divided Society, 116. Google Scholar

97.Frank Farrell, International Socialism & Australian Labour: The Left in Australia 1919–1939(:Hale & Iremonger, 1981), 22. Google Scholar

98.Murray Perks, “Labour and the Governor-General’s Recruiting Conference,” Labour History, no. 34 (May1978):32, 35. Google Scholar

99. Daily Standard, 26 April, 1917, 8. Google Scholar

100. Ibid., 26 April1919, 5. Google Scholar

101.Noel McLachlan, “Nationalism and the Divisive Digger: Three Comments,” Meanjin Quarterly 27, no.3(1968):306. Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Cryle, Mark