DFID’s new urban discourse: a critique

McGill, Ronald

doi:https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.26

McGill, Ronald

Town Planning Review (2020), 91, (5), 461–474.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.26
Language: English
Pages: 14

Abstract

DFID is a self-confessed late entrant to the urban discourse. Two major recent proposals give this assertion credence. First is the collective Cities and Infrastructure for Growth (CIG) programme, to strengthen the management of urban and energy sectors and boost investment in infrastructure. Second is the African Cities Research Programme, to produce new knowledge and evidence on African cities as systems. In turn, from both practical and research standpoints, they seek to reduce poverty and enhance national prosperity through the known advantages of urbanisation, while impacting on its negative dimensions. This critique seeks to test the assumptions underscoring both proposals.

FormatArticle

£25.00

READ THIS ARTICLE

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

References

BAI, X., SURVEYER, A., ELMQVIST, T., GATZWEILER, F. W., GÜNERALP, B., PARNELL, S., PRIEUR-RICHARD, A.-H., SHRIVASTAVA, P., SIRI, J. G., STAFFORD-SMITH, M., TOUSSAINT, J.-P., and WEBB, R. (2016), ‘Defining and advancing a systems approach for sustainable cities’, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 23, 69-78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.010 (accessed 24 May 2019). Google Scholar

BERNSTEIN, R. J. (1971), Praxis and Action: Contemporary Philosophies of Human Activity, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar

CHADWICK, G. F. (1971), A Systems View of Planning: Towards a Theory of Urban and Regional Planning, Oxford and New York, Pergamon Press. Google Scholar

CUTHBERT, M. (1974), The Epistemology of Town Planning: The Contribution of Patrick Geddes (delivered through planning theory lectures in 1974), Edinburgh, Town Planning Department, Heriot-Watt University. Google Scholar

DFID (2019a), African Cities Research Programme, London, Department for International Development. Google Scholar

DFID (2019b), Cities and Infrastructure for Growth (CIG) Programme, Wave 2, London, Department for International Development. Google Scholar

FLYVBJERG, B. (2004), ‘Phronetic planning research: theoretical and methodological reflections’, Planning Theory and Practice, 5, 283-306. Google Scholar

GLAESER, E. (2011), Triumph of the City: How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier and Happier, Basingstoke, Macmillan. Google Scholar

HARRISON, P. (2014), ‘Making planning theory real’, Planning Theory, 13, 65-81. Google Scholar

HELD, D. (1980), Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas, London, Hutchinson & Co. Google Scholar

McGILL, R. (1996-1997), Institutional Development: A Third World City Management Perspective, Basingstoke, Macmillan and New York, St Martin’s Press. Google Scholar

McGILL, R. (2018), ‘Making towns work: Habitat III - what relevance?’, Planning Theory and Practice, 19, 140-48. Google Scholar

McLOUGHLIN, J. B. (1969), Urban and Regional Planning: A Systems Approach, London, Faber and Faber. Google Scholar

MIRAFTAB, F. (2009), ‘Insurgent planning: situating radical planning in the global South’, Planning Theory, 8, 32-50. Google Scholar

SAGHIR, J. and SANTORO, J. (2018), Urbanisation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Meeting Challenges by Bridging Stakeholders, Washington DC, Centre for Strategic and International Studies. Google Scholar

TAYLOR, E. J. and HURLEY, J. (2015), ‘“Not a lot of people read the stuff”: Australian urban research in planning practice’, Urban Policy and Research, 34, 116-31. Google Scholar

UN (2004), Unleashing Entrepreneurship: Making Business Work for the Poor, New York, UNDP. Google Scholar

UN (2018), Revision of World Urbanization Prospects, New York, UN DESA. Google Scholar

WORLD BANK (2017), African Cities: Opening Doors to the World, Washington, DC. Google Scholar