Bulletin of Hispanic Studies

Obras citadas

Aresti, Nerea, 2000. ‘El ángel del hogar y sus demonios. Ciencia, religión y género en la España del siglo XIX’, Historia Contemporánea 21: 363-94. Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W., 1999. ‘Perceptual Symbol System’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 577-660. Google Scholar

Blanco, Alda, 1998. ‘Teóricas de la conciencia feminista’, en La mujer en los discursos de género: textos y contextos, eds. Catherine Jagoe, Alda Blanco y Cristina Enríquez de Salamanca. (Barcelona: Icaria), pp. 445-72. Google Scholar

Boogaart, Ronny, y Alex Reuneke, 2017. ‘Intersubjectivity and Grammar’, en The Cambridge Book of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. Barbara Dancygier. (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), pp. 325-59. Google Scholar

Cameron, Lynne, y Alice Deignan, 2003. ‘Combining Large and Small Corpora to Investigating Tuning Devices Around Metaphor in Spoken Discourse’, Metaphor and Symbol 18.3: 149-60. Google Scholar

Campos, Héctor, 1999. ‘Transitividad e intransitividad’, en Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, dirs. Ignacio Bosque y Violeta Demonte. (Madrid: Espasa-Calpe), pp. 1519-1574. Google Scholar

Croft, William, 2003. ‘The Role of Domains in the Interpretation of Metaphors and Metonymies’, en Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, ed. Rene Dirven y Ralf Pörings. (Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter), pp. 161-206. Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara, y Eve Sweetser, 2014. Figurative Language (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press). Google Scholar

Demonte, Violeta, 1990. ‘Transitividad, intransitividad y papeles temáticos’, en Estudios de lingüística de España y de México, ed. Violeta Demonte y Beatriz Garza Cuarón. (México: UNAM), pp. 115-50. Google Scholar

Demonte, Violeta, y Pascual Masullo, 1999. ‘La predicación: los complementos predicativos’, en Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, dirs. Ignacio Bosque y Violeta Demonte. (Madrid: Espasa-Calpe), pp. 2461-2524. Google Scholar

Díaz-Peralta, Marina, 2018. ‘Metaphor and Ideology: Conceptual Structure and Conceptual Content in Spanish Political Discourse’, Discourse & Communication 12.2: 128-48. Google Scholar

Díaz-Peralta, Marina, 2019. ‘Gramática y perspectiva cognitiva en el nuevo discurso parlamentario español acerca de la desigualdad y la violencia de género’, en Le Renouveau Parlamentaire: entre discours et action, ed. Melanie Trédez-Lopes y Henry Hernandez Bayte. (París: L’Hamattan), pp. 293-310. Google Scholar

Diccionario de la lengua Española (DLE), 2020. Edición del Tricentenario. (Madrid: Real Academia de la Lengua Española). dle.rae. Consulta 12 de mayo 2021. Google Scholar

DLE 2020 véase Diccionario de la lengua Española 2020 Google Scholar

Fernández, María, 2008. ‘Historia de las mujeres en España: historia de una conquista’, La Aljaba 12: 11-20. Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles, 1999. ‘Inversion and Constructional Inheritance’, en Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation, ed. G. Webelhuth, Jean-Pierre Koenig y Andreas Kathol. (Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, Stanford University), pp. 113-28. Google Scholar

Fischer, Kerstin, 2017. ‘Cognitive Linguistics and Pragmatics’, en The Cambridge Book of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. Barbara Dancygier. (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), pp. 609-41. Google Scholar

Hart, Christopher, 2013. ‘Event-construal in Press Reports of Violence in Two Recent Political Protests: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach to CDA’, Journal of Language and Politics 12.3: 400-24. Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul, y Sandra Thompson, 1980. ‘Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse’, Language 56.2: 251-99. Google Scholar

Koller, Veronika, 2011. ‘Analysing Lesbian Identity in Discourse: Combining Discourse-historical and Socio-cognitive approaches’, en Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. Christopher Hart. (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. 119-42. Google Scholar

Koller, Veronika, 2014. ‘Cognitve Linguistics and Ideology’, en The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, eds. Janette Littlemore y John Taylor. (Nueva York: Bloomsbury), pp. 234-52. Google Scholar

Lakoff, George, 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Thing. What Categories Reveals About the Mind (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press). Google Scholar

Lakoff, George, y Mark Johnson, 1980. Metaphors We Live By (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press). Google Scholar

Lakoff, George, Jane Espenson y Alan Schwartz, 1991. Master Metaphor List (Berkeley CA: Cognitive Linguistics Group). Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald, 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press). Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald, 2000. ‘Estructura de la cláusula en la gramática cognoscitiva’, Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada. Volumen Monográfico: 19-65. Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald, 2001. ‘Dinamicity in Grammar’, Axiomathes 12: 7-33. Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald, 2002. Concept, Image and Symbol (Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter). Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald, 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction (Oxford University Press). Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald, 2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar (Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter). Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald, 2010. ‘Conceptualization, Symbolization, and Grammar’, International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics 1.1: 31-64. Google Scholar

Li, Juan, 2011. ‘Collision of Language in News Discourse: A Functional-Cognitive Perspective on Transitivity’, Critical Discourse Studies 8.3: 203-19. Google Scholar

Marín Arrese, Juana, 2011a. ‘Epistemic Legitimizing Strategies, Commitment and Accountability in Discourse’, Discourse Studies 13.6: 789-97. Google Scholar

Marín Arrese, Juana, 2011b. ‘Effective vs. Epistemic Stance and Subjectivity in Political Discourse: Legitimising Strategies and Mystification of Responsibility’, en Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. Christopher Hart. (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. 193-223. Google Scholar

Mendikoetxtea, Amaya, 1999. ‘Construcciones inacusativas y pasivas’, en Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, ed. Ignacio Bosque y Violeta Demonte. (Madrid: Espasa-Calpe), pp. 1575-1630. Google Scholar

Musolff, Andrea, 2019. ‘Metaphor Framing in Political Discourse’, Mythos-Magazin: Politisches Framing 1. http://www.mythos-magazin.de/politisches-framing/forum-w.htm. Consulta 13 de mayo 2021. Google Scholar

Núñez-Perucha, Begoña, 2011. ‘Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Linguistics as Tools for Ideological Research. A Diachronic Analysis of Feminism’, en Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. Christopher Hart. (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. 97-118. Google Scholar

Osborn, Michael, 1967. ‘Archetypal Metaphor in Rhetoric: The Light-Dark Family’, Quarterly Journal of Speech 53: 115-26. Google Scholar

Pérez Galdós, Benito, 1923a. Obras inéditas ordenadas y prologadas por Alberto Ghiraldo. Vol III. Política Española. Tomo I. (Madrid: Renacimiento). Google Scholar

Pérez Galdós, Benito, 1923b. Obras inéditas ordenadas y prologadas por Alberto Ghiraldo. Vol IV. Política Española. Tomo II. (Madrid: Renacimiento). Google Scholar

Pérez Galdós, Benito, 1972. Benito Pérez Galdós, Los artículos de Galdós en ‘La Nación’ 1865-1866, 1868, ed. William H. Shoemaker. (Madrid: Ínsula). Google Scholar

Pragglejaz Group, 2007. ‘MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse’, Metaphor and Symbol 22.1: 1-39. Google Scholar

Reijnierse, W. Gudrun, Christian Burgers, Tina Krennmayr y Gerard J. Steen, 2018. ‘On Metaphorical Views, Dynamite, and Doodlings’, Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16.2: 431-54. Google Scholar

Rice, Susan, 1987. ‘Towards a Cognitive Model of Transitivity’, Tesis Doctoral. www.researchgate.net/search.Search.html?type=researcher&query=susan%20rice%20towards%20a%20cognitive%20model%20of%20transitivity. Consulta 13 de mayo 2021. Google Scholar

Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco, y Alicia Galera-Masegosa, 2012. ‘Modelos cognitivos, operaciones cognitivas y usos figurados del lenguaje’, Forma y Función 25.2: 11-38. Google Scholar

Sanfeliu, Luz, 2008. ‘Del laicismo al sufragismo. Marcos conceptuales y estrategias de actuación del feminismo republicano entre los siglos XIX y XX’, Pasado y Memoria. Revista de Historia Contemporánea 7: 59-78. Google Scholar

Shapiro, Lawrence, 2019. ‘Flesh Matters: The Body in Cognition’, Mind & Language 34: 3-20. Google Scholar

Steen, Gerard, 2009. ‘From Linguistic Form to Conceptual Structure in Five Steps: Analyzing Metaphor in Poetry’, en Cognitive Poetics. Goals, Gains and Gaps, eds. Geert Brône y Jeroen Vandaele. (Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter), pp. 197-226. Google Scholar

Steen, Gerard, 2011. ‘From Three Dimensions to Five Steps: The Value of Deliberate Metaphor’, metaphorik.de 21: 83-110. Google Scholar

Steen, Gerard, 2015. ‘Developing, Testing and Interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory’, Journal of Pragmatics 90: 67-72. Google Scholar

Steen, Gerard. J., Aletta G. Dorsdt, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, Tinua Krennmayr y Truntke Pasma, 2010. A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification (Amsterdam: John Benjamins). Google Scholar

Sullivan, Karen, 2007. ‘Lexical Filledness and Metaphor in Idioms’, en Collocations and Idioms, eds. Marja Nenonen, Sinikka Niemi y Jussi Niemi. (Finland: Joensuu University Press), pp. 330-41. Google Scholar

Sullivan, Karen, 2014. Frames and Constructions in Metaphoric Language (Amsterdam: John Benjamins). Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard, 1986. ‘Force Dynamics as a Generalization over ‘Causative’’, en Languages and Linguistics: The Interdependence of Theory, Data, and Application, eds. Deborah Tannen y James E. Alatis. (Washington: Georgetown University Press), pp. 67-85. Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard, 1988. ‘Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition’, Cognitive Science 12: 49-100. Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard, 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press). Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard, 2006. ‘Grammatical Construal. The Relation of Grammar to Cognition’, en Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, ed. Dirk Geeraerts. (Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter), pp. 69-108. Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun A., 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach (Londres: Sage). Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun A., 1999. ‘Towards a Theory of Context and Experience Models in Discourse Processing’, en The Construction of Mental Representations during Reading, ed. Herre van Oostendorp y Susan Goldman. (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), pp. 123-48. Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun A., 2002. ‘Political Discourse and Political Cognition’, en Politics as Text and Talk. Analytical Approaches to Political Discourse, ed. Paul Chilton y Christina Schäffner. (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. 204-36. Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun A., 2008. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press). Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun A., 2018. ‘The Socio-cognitive Discourse Studies’, en The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. John Flowerdew y John Richardson. (Londres: Routledge), pp. 26-44. Google Scholar

Wodak, Ruth, y Bernhard Forchtner, 2018. ‘Introducing the Language-Politics Nexus’, en The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, ed. Ruth Wodak y Bernhard Forchtner. (Londres: Routledge), pp. 1-14. Google Scholar