Developer contributions and community benefits: understanding the regulatory context for the implementation of a value-capturing instrument in Northern Ireland

Town Planning Review (2021), 92, (5), 615–642.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2021.33
Language: English
Pages: 28

Abstract

Developer contributions have a rich history in all UK jurisdictions, other than in Northern Ireland (NI). This paper presents a moment in NI’s planning modernisation in which a scheme of developer contributions has been introduced, primarily by Belfast City Council. There has been little scholarship devoted to NI’s planning reform, however, there has been considerable attention directed to the increasingly neo-liberal governing landscape in which these reforms took place. We consider this debate and try to place the implementation of developer contributions in this context. Our primary evidence is based on policy analysis, committee records and interviews with stakeholders across the planning community. In the case we have presented the lack of definition around what constitutes a community benefit has opened space for deliberation across the NI planning community. This discussion has encouraged a debate that broadly centres around a neo-liberal abstraction of the purpose of developer contributions. When considering the subject of this special issue, Rethinking Regulation, we question what the purpose is for developer contributions as a contemporary planning process. We do this by investigating the relationship between ‘community’ and the ‘public interest’ under neo-liberal governing regimes. We present issues of policy ambiguity, of scale and of viability as a decision-making tool. We conclude that deverloper contributions in NI have become an instrument that is narrow in purpose, yet one which has become codified around a market-focused rationality. We finally reflect on policy performance to date, highlighting a seemingly inherent difficulty for planning authorities in realising social outcomes through developer contributions.

FormatArticle

£25.00

READ THIS ARTICLE

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

References

ADAMS, D. and TIESDELL, S. (2010), ‘Planners as market actors: rethinking state-market relations in land and property’, Planning Theory & Practice, 11, 187-207. Google Scholar

ADAMS, D. and WATKINS, C. (2018), ‘Making the economic case for planning’, Town Planning Review, 89, 437-42. Google Scholar

ALLMENDINGER, P. and HAUGHTON, G. (2013), ‘The evolution and trajectories of English spatial governance: “neoliberal” episodes in planning’, Planning Practice & Research, 28, 6-26. Google Scholar

ASKEW, J. (2018), ‘A British perspective on added value capture: ups and downs during its history’, in J. D. Gerber, T. Hartmann and A. Hengstermann, Instruments of Land Policy: Dealing with Scarcity of Land, Abingdon, Routledge, 74-77. Google Scholar

BAXAMUSA, M. H. (2008), ‘Empowering communities through deliberation: the model of community benefit agreements’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27, 261-76. Google Scholar

BCC (BELFAST CITY COUNCIL) (2017), Planning Committee. Item 5. Notice of Motion - Developer Contributions, https://minutes3.belfastcity.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=167&MId=8333&Ver=4 (accessed 21 November 2018). Google Scholar

BCC (BELFAST CITY COUNCIL) (2018a), Belfast Local Development Plan, https://www.belfastcity.gov.uk/buildingcontrol-environment/Planning/localdevelopmentplan.aspx (accessed 18 April 2019). Google Scholar

BCC (BELFAST CITY COUNCIL) (2018b), Draft Development Contributions Framework, https://www.belfastcity.gov.uk/buildingcontrol-environment/Planning/Developer_Contributions_Framework_consultation.aspx (accessed 18 April 2019). Google Scholar

BCC (BELFAST CITY COUNCIL) (2018c), Strategic Policy and Resource Committee. Item 6d. Public Realm/Developer Contributions: Pilot Project, https://minutes3.belfastcity.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=163&MId=8761&Ver=4 (accessed 21 November 2018). Google Scholar

BCC (BELFAST CITY COUNCIL) (2020), ‘Draft developer contributions framework summary of key issues and responses’, http://www.belfastcity.gov.uk/nmsruntime/saveasdialog.aspx?lID=36607&sID=25096 (accessed 18 June 2020). Google Scholar

BEEN, V. (2010), ‘Community benefits agreements: a new local government tool or another variation on the exactions theme?’, University of Chicago Law Review, 77, 5-35. Google Scholar

BOLAND, P. (2014), ‘The relationship between spatial planning and economic competitiveness: the “path to economic nirvana” or a “dangerous obsession”?’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46, 770-87. Google Scholar

BOLAND, P., BRONTE, J. and MUIR, J. (2017), ‘On the waterfront: neoliberal urbanism and the politics of public benefit’, Cities, 61, 117-27. Google Scholar

BOOTH, P. (2003), Planning by Consent: The Origins and Nature of British Development Control, Oxford, Routledge. Google Scholar

BRENNER, N., PECK, J. and THEODORE, N. (2012), ‘Towards deep neoliberalisation’, in J. Kunkel and M. Mayer, Neoliberal Urbanism and Its Contestations: Crossing Theoretical Boundaries, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 27-46. Google Scholar

CAMPBELL, H., ELLIS, H., GLADWELL, C. and HENNEBERRY, J. (2000), ‘Planning obligations, planning practice, and land-use outcomes’, Environment & Planning B: Planning and Design, 27, 759-75. Google Scholar

CAMPBELL, H. and MARSHALL, R. (2000), ‘Public involvement and planning: looking beyond the one to the many’, International Planning Studies, 5, 321-44. Google Scholar

CAMPBELL, H. and MARSHALL, R. (2002), ‘Utilitarianism’s bad breath? A re-evaluation of the public interest justification for planning’, Planning Theory, 1, 163-87. Google Scholar

CAMPBELL, H., TAIT, M. and WATKINS, C. (2014), ‘Is there space for better planning in a neoliberal world? Implications for planning practice & theory’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34, 45-59. Google Scholar

CATNEY, P. and HENNEBERRY, J. (2019), ‘Change in the political economy of value capture in England’, Town Planning Review, 90, 339-58. Google Scholar

CONLON, E. V. BELFAST CITY COUNCIL (2018), NIQB 49, https://judiciaryni.uk/sites/judiciary/files/decisions/Application%20by%20Elizabeth%20Conlon%20for%20Judicial%20Review%20v%20Belfast%20City%20Council_0.pdf (accessed 21 November 2019). Google Scholar

COULTER, C. (2014), ‘Under which constitutional arrangement would you still prefer to be unemployed? Neoliberalism, the peace process, and the politics of class in Northern Ireland’, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 37, 763-76. Google Scholar

COYLES, D. (2013), ‘Reflections on Titanic Quarter: the cultural and material legacy of an historic Belfast brand’, Journal of Architecture, 18, 331-63. Google Scholar

COYLES, D. (2017), ‘Journeys through the hidden city: giving visibility to the material events of conflict in Belfast’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35, 1053-75. Google Scholar

CROOK, A. D. H. and MONK, S. (2011), ‘Planning gains, providing homes’, Housing Studies, 26, 997-1018. Google Scholar

CROOK, A. D. H. and WHITEHEAD, C. (2002), ‘Social housing and planning gain: is this an appropriate way of providing affordable housing?’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 34, 1259-79. Google Scholar

CROOK, A. D. H. and WHITEHEAD, C. (2019), ‘Capturing development value, principles and practice: why is it so difficult?’, Town Planning Review, 90, 359-81. Google Scholar

CROOK, T., HENNEBERRY, J. and WHITEHEAD, C. (2016), Planning Gain: Providing Infrastructure & Affordable Housing, Chichester, Wiley Blackwell, RICS Research. Google Scholar

CROSBY, N., McALLISTER, P. and WYATT, P. (2013), ‘Fit for planning? An evaluation of the application of development viability appraisal models in the UK planning system’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 40, 3-22. Google Scholar

CROW, S. (1998), ‘Planning gain: there must be a better way’, Planning Perspectives, 13, 357-72. Google Scholar

DFI (DEPARTMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE) (2017), ‘Development Management Practice Note 21: Section 76 Planning Agreements’, https://www.infrastructure-ni.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/infrastructure/dmpn-21-section-76-planning-agreementsv1-jan-2017_0.pdf (accessed 5 July 2021). Google Scholar

DOE (DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT) (1998), Planning Policy Statement 1: General Principles, https://www.planningni.gov.uk/index/policy/planning_statements_and_supplementary_planning_guidance/pps01.htm (accessed 18 April 2019). Google Scholar

DOE (DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT) (2009), Reform of the Planning System in Northern Ireland:Your Chance to Influence Change, https://www.planningni.gov.uk/index/news/news_consultation/consultation_paper_final_200709_2.pdf (accessed 18 April 2019). Google Scholar

DOE (DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT) (2015), Strategic Planning Policy Statement, https://www.planningni.gov.uk/SPPS (accessed 18 April 2019). Google Scholar

DUNNING, R., LORD, A., KESKIN, B. and BUCK, M. (2019), ‘Is there a relationship between planning culture and the value of planning gain? Evidence from England’, Town Planning Review, 90, 453-71. Google Scholar

FERM, J. and RACO, M. (2020), ‘Viability planning, value capture and the geographies of market-led planning reform in England’, Planning Theory and Practice, 21, 218-35. Google Scholar

FOX-RODGERS, L. and MURPHY, E. (2015), ‘From brown envelopes to community benefits: the co-option of planning gain agreements under deepening neoliberalism’, Geoforum, 67, 41-50. Google Scholar

GRANT, M. (1992), ‘The planning balance in the 1990s: betterment again?’, Journal of Planning and Environment Law, 67-83. Google Scholar

HARVEY, D. (2006), ‘Neoliberalism as creative destruction’, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 88, 145-58. Google Scholar

HEALEY, P. (2015), ‘Civil society enterprise and local development’, Planning Theory and Practice, 16, 11-27. Google Scholar

HEALEY, P., PURDUE, M. and ENNIS, F. (1996), ‘Negotiating development: planning gain and mitigating impacts’, Journal of Property Research, 13, 143-60. Google Scholar

HELBRECHT, I. and WEBER-NEWTH, F. (2018), ‘Recovering the politics of planning’, City, 22, 116-29. Google Scholar

HINCKS, S., DUNNING, R., MOORE., YOUNG, G. and WATKINS, C. (2020), A View from the North: Understanding Local Authority Housing and Planning Capacity in an Era of Austerity, report, Northern Housing Consortium. Google Scholar

HORGAN, G. (2006), ‘Devolution, direct rule and neo-liberal reconstruction in Northern Ireland’, Critical Social Policy, 26, 656-68. Google Scholar

HUGHES, C. (2019), ‘Resisting or enabling? The roll-out of neoliberal values through the voluntary and community sector in Northern Ireland’, Critical Policy Studies, 13, 61-68. Google Scholar

INCH, A. (2018), ‘Opening for business’? Neoliberalism and the cultural politics of modernising planning in Scotland’, Urban Studies, 55, 1076-92. Google Scholar

INCH, A., DUNNING, R., WHILE, A., HICKMAN, H. and PAYNE, S. (2020), ‘“The object is to change the hearts and soul”: financial incentives, planning and opposition to new housebuilding in England’, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 38, 713-32. Google Scholar

JANSSEN-JANSEN, L. B. and VAN DER VEEN, M. (2017), ‘Contracting communities: conceptualizing community benefit agreements to improve citizen involvement in urban development projects’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49, 205-25. Google Scholar

JESSOP, B. (2000), ‘The crises of the national spatio-temporal fix and the ecological dominance of globalising’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24, 323-60. Google Scholar

LENNON, M. (2017), ‘On “the subject” of planning’s public interest’, Planning Theory, 16, 150-68. Google Scholar

LLOYD, M. G. (2008), Planning Reform in Northern Ireland: Independent Report to the Minister for the Environment, https://www.planningni.gov.uk/index/common-about-dfi-planning/aboutreform-independent-expert-report.pdf (accessed 18 April 2019). Google Scholar

LLOYD, M. G. (2011), ‘The spatial planning model: balancing private sector interests with the“common good”’, in M. G. Lloyd, Provenance, Planning and New Parameters, University of Amsterdam, 43-56. Google Scholar

LLOYD, M. G. and PEEL, D. (2011), ‘Planning reform in Northern Ireland: Planning Act (Northern Ireland) 2011’, Planning Theory and Practice, 13, 177-82. Google Scholar

LLOYD,M. G. and PEEL, D. (2012), ‘Soft contracturalism? Facilitating institutional change in planning and development relations in Scotland’, Urban Research and Practice, 5, 239-55. Google Scholar

LORD, A. (2009), ‘The community infrastructure levy: an information economics approach to understanding infrastructure provision under England’s reformed spatial planning system’, Planning Theory & Practice, 10, 333-49. Google Scholar

LORD, A., BURGESS, G., GU, Y. and DUNNING, R. (2019), ‘Virtuous or vicious circles? Exploring the behavioural connections between developer contributions and path dependence: evidence from England’, Geoforum, 106, 244-52. Google Scholar

LORD, A. and O’BRIEN, P. (2017), ‘What price planning? Reimagining planning as “market maker”’, Planning Theory and Practice, 18, 217-32. Google Scholar

LORD, A., O’BRIEN, P., SYKES, O. and STURZAKER, J. (2015), Planning as ‘Market Maker’: How Planning Is Used to Stimulate Development in Germany, France and the Netherlands (RTPI Research Report No. 11), Royal Town Planning Institute. Google Scholar

McALLISTER, P. (2017), ‘The calculating turn in land value capture: lessons from the English planning system’, Land Use Policy, 63, 122-29. Google Scholar

McALLISTER, P., SHEPHERD, E. and WYATT, P. (2018), ‘Policy shifts, developer contributions and land value capture in London 2005-2017’, Land Use Policy, 78, 316-26. Google Scholar

McCABE, C. (2013), The Double Transition: The Economic and Political Transition of Peace, Belfast, Trademark Belfast. Google Scholar

MORONI, S. (2004), ‘Towards a reconstitution of the public interest criterion’, Planning Theory, 3, 151-71. Google Scholar

MUIR, J. (2014), ‘Neoliberalising a divided society? The regeneration of Crumlin Road Gaol and Girdwood Park, North Belfast’, Local Economy, 29, 52-64. Google Scholar

MUÑOZ GIELEN, D., MAGUREGUI SALAS, I. and BURÓN CUADRADO, J. (2017), ‘International comparison of the changing dynamics of governance approaches to land development and their results for public value capture’, Cities, 71, 123-34. Google Scholar

MURTAGH, B. (2011), ‘Ethno-religious segregation in post-conflict Belfast’, Built Environment, 37, 213-25. Google Scholar

MURTAGH, B. and SHIRLOW, P. (2012), ‘Devolution and the politics of development in Northern Ireland’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30, 46-61. Google Scholar

NAGLE, J. (2009), ‘Potemkin Village: neo-liberalism and peace-building in Northern Ireland’, Ethnopolitics, 8, 173-90. Google Scholar

NEIL, J. V. W. (2017), ‘Beyond the balm of communicative planning: can actor-network theory insights and a more agonistic practice help unlock creative “post-conflict” potential? Towards a renewed research horizon in Northern Ireland’, Planning Practice & Research, 32, 319-32. Google Scholar

NISRA (NORTHERN IRELAND STATISTICS AND RESEARCH AGENCY) (2017), Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measures 2017, https://www.nisra.gov.uk/sites/nisra.gov.uk/files/publications/NIMDM17-%20with%20ns.pdf (accessed 21 November 2019). Google Scholar

NISRA (NORTHERN IRELAND STATISTICS AND RESEARCH AGENCY) (2018), NISRA Statistical Bulletin: 2018 Mid-year Population Estimates for Northern Ireland, https://www.nisra.gov.uk/sites/nisra.gov.uk/files/publications/MYE18-Bulletin.pdf (accessed 21 November 2019). Google Scholar

NORTHERN IRELAND EXECUTIVE (2011), Investment Strategy for Northern Ireland 2011-21 Building a Better Future, http://isni.gov.uk/PDFs/Investment%20Strategy.pdf (accessed 18 April 2019). Google Scholar

PARKS, V. and WARREN, D. (2009), ‘The politics and practice of economic justice: community benefit agreements as tactic of the new accountable development movement’, Journal of Community Practice, 17, 88-106. Google Scholar

PEEL, D. and LLOYD, M. G. (2012), ‘The Edinburgh concordat: contractual, collaborative positive planning?’, Public Performance & Management Review, 36, 275-89. Google Scholar

PENNY, J. (2017), ‘Between coercion and consent: the politics of “cooperative governance” at a time of “austerity localism” in London’, Urban Geography, 38, 1352-73. Google Scholar

RACO, M., DURRANT, D. and LIVINGSTONE, N. (2018), ‘Slow cities, urban politics and the temporalities of planning: lessons from London’, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36, 1176-94. Google Scholar

RACO, M., LIVINGSTONE, N. and DURRANT, D. (2019), ‘Seeing like an investor: urban development in planning, financialisation, and investors’ perceptions of London as an investment space’, European Planning Studies, 27, 1064-82. Google Scholar

RAFFERTY, G. (2012), ‘Embracing the creation of shared space: considering the potential intersection between community planning and peace-building’, Space and Polity, 16, 197-213. Google Scholar

RTPI (ROYAL TOWN PLANNING INSTITUTE) (2000), Planning Gains and Obligations: A Policy Paper, London, The Royal Town Planning Institute. Google Scholar

SAITO, L. T. (2012), ‘How low-income residents can benefit from urban development: the LA Live Community Benefits Agreement’, City Community, 11, 129-50. Google Scholar

WALDRON, R. (2019), ‘Financialization, urban governance and the planning system: utilizing “development viability” as a policy narrative for the liberalization of Ireland’s post-crash planning system’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43, 685-704. Google Scholar

WOLF-POWERS, L. (2010), ‘Community benefits agreements and local government’, The Journal of the American Planning Association, 76, 141-59. Google Scholar

WYATT, P. (2017), ‘Experiences of running negotiable and non-negotiable developer contributions side-by-side’, Planning Practice and Research, 32, 152-70. Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Kearney, Matthew

Ritchie, Heather

Town Planning Review