Town Planning Review

Munich’s developer obligations as a legal transplant to the Czech institutional context

Town Planning Review Ahead of print, 1–22.

Abstract

Well-established developer-obligation models are embedded in many countries. Policy transfers might seem appropriate for adopting such schemes elsewhere. This study brings in-depth insight into the perceptions of key stakeholders on developer obligations from countries with and without such an instrument and demonstrates the barriers hindering policy transfer. We utilise the currently contemplated policy transfer of the Munich model of developer obligations (Germany) into the Czech institutional context as a case study. Our results show that an instrument successful in one institutional arrangement may be perceived as an unattainable dream elsewhere. Surprisingly, developers, instead of hindering the adoption of developer obligations, support them. They praise them for knowing all liabilities in advance, and for being partners for the public sector instead of enemies. On the other hand, differences in institutional context constitute barriers that might result in having an empty legal shell out of the transplant.

Access Token
£25.00
READ THIS ARTICLE
If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

References

AGYEMANG, F. and MORRISON, N. (2018), ‘Recognising the barriers to securing affordable housing through the land use planning system in sub-Saharan Africa: a perspective from Ghana’, Urban Studies, 55, 2640-59. Google Scholar

ALTERMAN, R. (1990), ‘From expropriations to development agreements: developer obligations for public services in Israel’, Israel Law Review, 24, 28-81. Google Scholar

CDP7 (CITY DISTRICT OF PRAGUE 7) (2018), Principles of Financial Participation of the Investor in the Development of the City District of Prague 7, https://www.praha7.cz/potrebuji-zaridit/stavbarekonstrukce/planovani-stavby/financni-spoluucast-investora-na-rozvoji-mc-praha-7/ (accessed 21 July 2020). Google Scholar

DOLOWITZ, D. P. and MARSH, D. (2000), ‘Learning from abroad: the role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making’, Governance, 13, 5-23. Google Scholar

DRIXLER, E., FRIESECKE, F., KÖTTER, T., WEITKAMP, A. and WEISS, D. (2014), Kommunale Bodenpolitik und Baulandmodelle-Strategien für bezahlbaren Wohnraum? Eine vergleichende Analyse in deutschen Städten, Augsburg, DVW, Gesellschaft für Geodäsie, Geoinformation und Landmanagement e.V. Google Scholar

EVANS, M. (2009), ‘Policy transfer in critical perspective’, Policy Studies, 30, 243-68. Google Scholar

FALLER, B. and BEYER, C. (2018), ‘Baulandmodelle nach dem Vorbild der Münchner SoBoN’ (Building land models based on the Munich SoBoN), Vhw FWS, 3, 127-30. Google Scholar

FEŘTROVÁ, M., ŠPAČKOVÁ, P. and OUŘEDNÍČEK, M. (2013), ‘Analýza aktérů a problémových aspektů rozhodování při nakládání s územím v suburbánních obcích’, in M. Ouředníček and P. Špačková (eds), Sub Urbs: Krajina, sídla a lidé, Prague, Academia, 234-56. Google Scholar

FREEMAN, R. E. (1984), Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, New York, Basic Books. Google Scholar

GERBER, J. D., HARTMANN, T. and HENGSTERMANN, A. (eds) (2018), Instruments of Land Policy. Dealing with Scarcity of Land. London, Routledge. Google Scholar

HARTMANN, T. and SPIT, T. (2015), ‘Dilemmas of involvement in land management: comparing an active (Dutch) and a passive (German) approach’, Land Use Policy, 42, 729-37. Google Scholar

HAVEL, M. B. (2017), ‘How the distribution of rights and liabilities in relation to betterment and compensation links with planning and the nature of property rights: reflections on the Polish experience’, Land Use Policy, 67, 508-16. Google Scholar

HELBRECHT, I. and WEBER-NEWTH, F. (2017), ‘Die Abschöpfung des Planungsmehrwerts als Repolitisierung der Planung?’, Suburban, 5, 61-86. Google Scholar

HENDRICKS, A. (2020), ‘Public value capture: an opportunity to improve the economic situation of African municipalities!’, in Walter Timo de Vries, John Tiah Bugri and Fatima Mandhu (eds), Responsible and Smart Land Management Interventions: An African Context, Boca Raton, CRC Press - Taylor & Francis Group, 251-62. Google Scholar

HENDRICKS, A., KALBRO, T., LLORENTE, M., VILMIN, T. and WEITKAMP, A. (2017), ‘Public value capture of increasing property values: what are unearned increments? A comparative study of France, Germany and Sweden’, in E. Hepperle, R. Dixon-Gough, R. Mansberger, J. Paulsson, J. Hernik and Thomas Kalbro (eds), Land Ownership and Land Use Development: The Integration of Past, Present and Future in Spatial Planning and Land Management Policies, Zurich, vdf-Hochschulverlag, 257-82. Google Scholar

KLASSEN, J. (1990), ‘Household composition in medieval Bohemia’, Journal of Medieval History, 16, 55-75. Google Scholar

KRESSE, K., KANG, M., KIM, S. and VAN DER KRABBEN, E. (2020), ‘Value capture ideals and practice: development stages and the evolution of value capture policies’, Cities, 106, 102861, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102861. Google Scholar

KUCKARTZ, U. (2019), ‘Qualitative text analysis: a systematic approach’, in G. Kaiser and N. Presmeg (eds), Compendium for Early Career Researchers in Mathematics Education, Cham, Springer, 181-97. Google Scholar

LHM (LANDESHAUPTSTADT MÜNCHEN) (2017), Verfahrensgrundsätze zur Sozialgerechten Bodennutzung in der Neufassung vom 26.07.2017, https://www.muenchen.de/rathaus/Stadtverwaltung/Referat-fuer-Stadtplanung-und-Bauordnung/Stadt-und-Bebauungsplanung/SoBoN.html (accessed 13 May 2019). Google Scholar

LHM (LANDESHAUPTSTADTMÜNCHEN) (2020), Sozialgerechte Bodennutzung (SoBoN): Erfolgsbilanz von 1994 bis 2019, https://www.muenchen.de/rathaus/Stadtverwaltung/Kommunalreferat/immobilien/sobon.html (accessed 14 August 2020). Google Scholar

LUNARDON, W. (2020), ‘Urban planning: Czech Republic in the European context’, Urbanismus a územní rozvoj, 20, 28-30. Google Scholar

McALLISTER, P., SHEPHERD, E. and WYATT, P. (2018), ‘Policy shifts, developer contributions and land value capture in London 2005-2017’, Land Use Policy, 78, 316-26. Google Scholar

MRDCR (MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC) (2019), Analýza stavu na úseku územního plánování a stavebního řádu, Analýza 2015-2017, http://www.uur.cz/default.asp?ID=4936 (accessed 21 July 2020). Google Scholar

MUÑOZ GIELEN, D. and LENFERINK, S. (2018), ‘The role of negotiated developer obligations in financing large public infrastructure after the economic crisis in the Netherlands’, European Planning Studies, 26, 768-91. Google Scholar

MUÑOZ GIELEN, D. and VAN DER KRABBEN, E. (eds) (2019), Public Infrastructure, Private Finance: Developer Obligations and Responsibilities, London, Routledge. Google Scholar

NEEDHAM, B. (2016), Dutch Land-Use Planning: The Principles and the Practice, London, Routledge. Google Scholar

OSTROM, E. (1986), ‘An agenda for the study of institutions’, Public Choice, 48, 3-25. Google Scholar

PECK, J. and THEODORE, N. (2010), ‘Mobilizing policy: models, methods, and mutations’, Geoforum, 41, 169-74. Google Scholar

POJANI, D. and STEAD, D. (2015), ‘Going Dutch? The export of sustainable land-use and transport planning concepts from the Netherlands’, Urban Studies, 52, 1558-76. Google Scholar

REBELO, E. M. (2017), ‘Land betterment capture revisited: a methodology for territorial plans’, Land Use Policy, 69, 392-407. Google Scholar

REED, M. S. (2008), ‘Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review’, Biological Conservation, 141, 2417-31. Google Scholar

SHAHAB, S., CLINCH, J. P. and O’NEILL, E. (2019), ‘Impact-based planning evaluation: advancing normative criteria for policy analysis’, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46, 534-50. Google Scholar

VALTONEN, E., FALKENBACH, H. and VIITANEN, K. (2018), ‘Securing public objectives in large-scale urban development: comparison of public and private land development’, Land Use Policy, 78, 481-492. Google Scholar

VAŘEKA, J. (1994), ‘Kulturní hranice a národní identita’ (Cultural borders and national identity), Český lid, 81, 177-83. Google Scholar

VEJCHODSKÁ, E., FELCMAN, J. and ŠINDLEROVÁ, V. (2019), ‘Ekonomické nástroje v české územně plánovací praxi: Potenciál a bariéry jejich využití’, Urbanismus a územní rozvoj, 22, 11-17. Google Scholar

VIALLON, F. X. (2018), ‘Added value capturing in Switzerland: how much is enough?’, in J. D. Gerber, T. Hartmann and A. Hengstermann (eds), Instruments of Land Policy: Dealing with Scarcity of Land, Abingdon and New York, Routledge, 69-89. Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Vejchodská, Eliška

Hendricks, Andreas