Godzilla (1998) as camp de-extinction narrative

Soles, Carter

doi:https://doi.org/10.3828/sfftv.2021.22

Soles, Carter

Science Fiction Film & Television (2021), 14, (3), 297–314.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/sfftv.2021.22
Language: English
Pages: 18

Abstract

Godzilla is one of the most famous de-extinct monsters in global popular cinema. Fan loyalty to the original Toho Studios conception of the creature as a super-powered, dinosaur-like creature helps explain the negative response to Roland Emmerich’s 1998 Hollywood version, which re-imagines Godzilla as a giant, irradiated twentieth-century iguana. Emmerich’s film is plotted around the monster’s attempt to use subterranean New York City as a spawning ground. The creature lays eggs that later hatch into baby Godzillas that look suspiciously like Jurassic Park-style velociraptors. Indeed, the movie plays like an expanded version of the last twenty minutes of The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997): a dinosaur-like creature runs amok in a major American city and is eventually defeated by a plan involving its offspring. Emmerich’s Godzilla is famous for being ‘Godzilla in name only’, yet its extensive intertextuality with The Lost World foregrounds de-extinction themes and imagery. Furthermore, Godzilla (1998) emphasises human action - in this case, 1950s French nuclear tests in French Polynesia - as the cause of the mutant creature’s emergence. Humans causing de-extinction is a key feature of the entire Godzilla franchise and of similar creature features from the 1950s to the present. Akin to its 1950s predecessors, Godzilla’s light, intentionally (and sometimes unintentionally) comedic tone open it to camp readings of the kind analysed by Bridgitte Barclay, who writes that the narrative and aesthetic shortcomings of schlocky sf B movies ‘disengage the audience from the filmic world and expose the mechanics of storytelling, making the master narrative a story and thereby resisting it by showing it as such’. Godzilla does just that, deflating its own anthropocentrism and rampant pro-militarism via its blatantly derivative story, shoddy digital effects and ham-handed dialogue.

FormatArticle

£25.00

READ THIS ARTICLE

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Works cited

Aberly, Rachel. The Making of Godzilla. New York: HarperPrism, 1998. Google Scholar

Barclay, Bridgitte. ‘The Extinction-Haunted Sea in The Monster That Challenged the World’. Fear and Nature: Ecohorror Studies in the Anthropocene. Ed. Christy Tidwell and Carter Soles. University Park: Penn State UP, 2021. 133-50. Google Scholar

Barclay, Bridgitte. ‘Female Beasties: Camp Resistance in 1950s SF Wom-Animal Creature Features’. Gender and Environment in Science Fiction. Ed. Christy Tidwell and Bridgitte Barclay. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2019. 3-20. Google Scholar

Bauman, Jay and Mike Stoklasa. ‘Half in the Bag Episode 71’. Red Letter Media (27 May 2014). www.redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag/half-in-the-bag-godzilla-98-and-godzilla-2014. Accessed 11 Jul 2021. Google Scholar

Burt, Jonathan. Animals in Film. London: Reaktion Books, 2002. Google Scholar

Chrisafis, Angelique. ‘French nuclear tests “showered vast area of Polynesia with radioactivity”’. The Guardian (3 Jul 2013). www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/03/french-nuclear-tests-polynesia-declassified. Accessed 11 Jul 2021. Google Scholar

DeVore, John. ‘In Defense of the 1998 Godzilla’. VanityFair.com (15 May 2014). https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2014/05/1998-godzilla-defense. Accessed 11 Jul 2021. Google Scholar

Ebert, Roger. ‘Godzilla’. RogerEbert.com (26 May 1998): http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/godzilla-1998. Accessed 11 Jul 2021. Google Scholar

Feil, Ken. Dying for a Laugh: Disaster Movies and the Camp Imagination. Middleton, CT: Wesleyan UP, 2005. Google Scholar

Hageman, Andrew. ‘Ecocinema and Ideology: Do Ecocritics Dream of a Clockwork Green?’ Ecocinema Theory and Practice. Ed. Stephen Rust, Salma Monani and Sean Cubitt. New York: Routledge, 2013. 63-86. Google Scholar

Klein, Naomi. This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2014. Google Scholar

Lichtenfield, Eric. Action Speaks Louder: Violence, Spectacle, and the American Action Movie. Rev. ed. Middleton, CT: Wesleyan UP, 2007. Google Scholar

Neale, Steve. Genre and Hollywood. London: Taylor and Francis, 2005. Google Scholar

Packer, George. ‘Elegy for the American Century’. The Atlantic 323.4 (May 2019): 82-98. Google Scholar

Packer, George. ‘Face the Bitter Truth’. theatlantic.com (4 Nov 2020). www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/11/theres-no-escaping-who-we-have-become/616992/. Accessed 11 Jul 2021. Google Scholar

Rhoads, Sean and Brooke McCorkle. Japan’s Green Monsters: Environmental Commentary in Kaiju Cinema. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2018. Google Scholar

Rust, Stephen. ‘Hollywood and Climate Change’. Ecocinema Theory and Practice. Ed. Stephen Rust, Salma Monani and Sean Cubitt. New York: Routledge, 2013. 191-211. Google Scholar

Seymour, Nicole. Bad Environmentalism: Irony and Irreverence in the Ecological Age. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2018. Google Scholar

Sontag, Susan. ‘Notes on “Camp”’. Against Interpretation and Other Essays. New York: Picador, 1966. 275-92. Google Scholar

Tidwell, Christy. ‘Life Finds a Way: Jurassic Park, Jurassic World, and Extinction Anxiety’. Fiction and the Sixth Mass Extinction: Narrative in an Era of Loss. Ed. Jonathan Elmore. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2020. 26-36. Google Scholar

Vint, Sherryl. Animal Alterity: Science Fiction and the Question of the Animal. Liverpool: Liverpool UP, 2010. Google Scholar

If you have private access to this content, please log in with your username and password here

Details

Author details

Soles, Carter

Science Fiction Film & Television